California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,059
- 0
- Banned
- #21
You are either for corporations giving money to candidates or you are not for it.
I am against this and dont want ANY corporatoion giving money to anyone.
You guys only seem to dislike it when your candidates dont win the election afterwards.
Lets all back laws that end this permenately
So how come you're silent on Obama's lies?
How come the WH is lying about 'forcing' BP to pay?
He 'misrepresented the truth' in '08 when he said
Obama: Since the gas lines of the ’70s, Democrats and Republicans have talked about energy independence, but nothing’s changed — except now Exxon’s making $40 billion a year, and we’re paying $3.50 for gas. I’m Barack Obama. I don’t take money from oil companies or Washington lobbyists, and I won’t let them block change anymore. They’ll pay a penalty on windfall profits. We’ll invest in alternative energy, create jobs and free ourselves from foreign oil. I approve this message because it’s time that Washington worked for you. Not them.
Now, as the intelligent among us knew at the time - NO candidate was allowed to take money directly from corporations.
However, Obama did take $213k from people work for, or with a spouse working for, oil companies.
For the record, my opinion is that no corporation should be allowed to donate to a political party or campaign. So that blows your 'you guys' theory out of the water.