Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
www.cnn.com
Bullshit!Temperatures on Greenland haven't been this warm in at least 1,000 years, scientists report | CNN
After years of research on the Greenland ice sheet -- which CNN visited when the cores were drilled -- scientists have reported temperatures there have been the warmest in at least the past 1,000 years.
The Greenland ice sheet is melting. By 2100 it will likely have added half a meter to global sea level all by itself.
Let me know when the snow melts and I will move up thereTemperatures on Greenland haven't been this warm in at least 1,000 years, scientists report | CNN
After years of research on the Greenland ice sheet -- which CNN visited when the cores were drilled -- scientists have reported temperatures there have been the warmest in at least the past 1,000 years.
The Greenland ice sheet is melting. By 2100 it will likely have added half a meter to global sea level all by itself.
Temperatures on Greenland haven't been this warm in at least 1,000 years, scientists report | CNN
After years of research on the Greenland ice sheet -- which CNN visited when the cores were drilled -- scientists have reported temperatures there have been the warmest in at least the past 1,000 years.
The Greenland ice sheet is melting. By 2100 it will likely have added half a meter to global sea level all by itself.
What I can't trust is anything YOU say.Bullshit!
Not verifiable. You can't trust anything these liars say.
By the way, Antarctic is having record cold and that is verifiable.
It's fucking January fruit loop.The abstract is hilarious since they leave out critical background temperature profile:
Abstract
The Greenland Ice Sheet has a central role in the global climate system owing to its size, radiative effects and freshwater storage, and as a potential tipping point1. Weather stations show that the coastal regions are warming2, but the imprint of global warming in the central part of the ice sheet is unclear, owing to missing long-term observations. Current ice-core-based temperature reconstructions3,4,5 are ambiguous with respect to isolating global warming signatures from natural variability, because they are too noisy and do not include the most recent decades. By systematically redrilling ice cores, we created a high-quality reconstruction of central and north Greenland temperatures from AD 1000 until 2011. Here we show that the warming in the recent reconstructed decade exceeds the range of the pre-industrial temperature variability in the past millennium with virtual certainty (P < 0.001) and is on average 1.5 ± 0.4 degrees Celsius (1 standard error) warmer than the twentieth century. Our findings suggest that these exceptional temperatures arise from the superposition of natural variability with a long-term warming trend, apparent since AD 1800. The disproportionate warming is accompanied by enhanced Greenland meltwater run-off, implying that anthropogenic influence has also arrived in central and north Greenland, which might further accelerate the overall Greenland mass loss.
=====
What is omitted is what is the CURRENT temperature profile of the region discussed.
From Polar Portal is a map of Greenland showing CURRENT temperatures for central and northern Greenland that is well below O degrees F.
LINK
What I can't trust is anything YOU say.
www.theguardian.com
It's fucking January fruit loop.
Here we show that the warming in the recent reconstructed decade exceeds the range of the pre-industrial temperature variability in the past millennium with virtual certainty (P < 0.001) and is on average 1.5 ± 0.4 degrees Celsius (1 standard error) warmer than the twentieth century. Our findings suggest that these exceptional temperatures arise from the superposition of natural variability with a long-term warming trend, apparent since AD 1800.
What’s the temperature?Temperatures on Greenland haven't been this warm in at least 1,000 years, scientists report | CNN
After years of research on the Greenland ice sheet -- which CNN visited when the cores were drilled -- scientists have reported temperatures there have been the warmest in at least the past 1,000 years.
The Greenland ice sheet is melting. By 2100 it will likely have added half a meter to global sea level all by itself.
So no temperature? Sore loserYou reject science when you don't like it. The facts don't mean shit to any of you.
You reject science when you don't like it. The facts don't mean shit to any of you.
They need to go back 10,000 years to discover that 8,500 of those years were warmer than today.Temperatures on Greenland haven't been this warm in at least 1,000 years, scientists report | CNN
After years of research on the Greenland ice sheet -- which CNN visited when the cores were drilled -- scientists have reported temperatures there have been the warmest in at least the past 1,000 years.
The Greenland ice sheet is melting. By 2100 it will likely have added half a meter to global sea level all by itself.
Accepting the opinion of 99% of the world's climate scientists and the mountains of empirical and scientific evidence supporting them isn't the least bit ironic.Oh the Irony!
sure it is since they believe water vapor is a net positive feedback. Empirical data says water vapor is a net negative feedback. If water vapor wasn’t a net negative feedback the planet would have never transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet when atmospheric CO2 was twice what it is today.Accepting the opinion of 99% of the world's climate scientists and the mountains of empirical and scientific evidence supporting them isn't the least bit ironic.
