Greenland ice melt worse than previously believed

[CrusaderFrank]

What do you think matters more...

The "climate scientists" doing "lab work"

OR

The highly correlated satellite and balloon data



Their definition of "lab work" is a tad on the LOOSE side...

Climate "scientists" don't do any stinking lab work, it's beneath them. They have consensus!

Consensus > Evidence

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You've got that turned around. It's not that AGW deniers tend to be racist bigots. It's that racist bigots tend to be AGW deniers. And, of course in this instance, we have the poster's attitude towards President Obama to put the icing on the cake.

They don’t even deny it

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You've got that turned around. It's not that AGW deniers tend to be racist bigots. It's that racist bigots tend to be AGW deniers. And, of course in this instance, we have the poster's attitude towards President Obama to put the icing on the cake.

Did IPCC ever factor in Obama lowering the sea levels into their models?

 

[EMH]

It is "racist" to notice that Ms. Barack is a cowardly communist cocksucking former gay coke whore who

1. was telling us up to 2010 that the Co2 FRAUD was the "greatest ever threat to humanity"
2. from 2010 to 2012 went SILENT on the issue as she was informed by Eric Holder that the FBI had a fraud prosecution of the "climate scientists"
3. decided to hide the FBI fraud case and in 2012 once again started calling the Co2 FRAUD "greatest threat"
4. in 2014 put up a satellite over Antarctica that is essentially a FUDGE satellite. Antarctic sea ice had been growing straight through 2014. Now, all of a sudden, since the homO satellite went up, AA sea ice is in "decline" except it isn't, we are just being lied to as usual
5. went out in 2017 and bought BEACHFRONT property on an island last hit by a Cat 5 in 1938, because she and Big Mike both know the Co2 FRAUD is FRAUD

 

[Crick]

They don’t even deny it

You don't bother denying your bigotry. Why shouldn't I point it out?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You don't bother denying your bigotry. Why shouldn't I point it out?

Example. Give me one. I ll wait, you’re such a little pussy. Can you even do a push up?

 

[Crick]

Example. Give me one. I ll wait, you’re such a little pussy. Can you even do a push up?

Okay. Hold your breath.

 

[protectionist]

purchasing sea side property erodes the confidence in the theory especially when it's being done by some of the loudest voices that espouse that theory. Not at all hard to understand it.

Obama

 

[Crick]

Obama

Obama is 63. He probably doesn't have more than 20-25 years left. In that time, sea level probably won't rise more than 12-13 inches. His house is 15 feet above sea level. And just his name on the deed likely doubled the value of the house the day he signed it. So what the fuck are you people going on about?

 

[EMH]

Obama is 63. He probably doesn't have more than 20-25 years left. In that time, sea level probably won't rise more than 12-13 inches. His house is 15 feet above sea level. And just his name on the deed likely doubled the value of the house the day he signed it. So what the fuck are you people going on about?

That's not the only issue, and your side is always blabbering BULLSHIT about "melting faster than expected" when there is precisely NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT which is why YOU CANNOT SHOW US ONE SINGLE PHOTO.

The other issue is canes. The Co2 FRAUD claims "global warming" is "increasing canes." That is complete BS and the data proves it... worst decade for canes the 1940s, second place the 1890s...

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

And then there is the issue of HOW FAR NORTH the cane gets. What is the LAST TIME a CAT 5 got far north enough to hit MV with 180 mph winds??

1938

1938 hurricane - Google Search

And since homO and big Mike's house is 15 feet above sea level....

LOL!!

If just what happened in 1938 happens again on this "warming" planet" with "oceans warming faster than expected...."


Category Five: • Winds greater than 155 mph, storm surge greater than 18 feet above normal tide.


LOL!!!


UNDER WATER!!!


LOL!!

homO and Big Mike have no fear of "global warming" because both know it is COMPLETE BULLSHIT, and homO herself not only shut down the FBI case, she gave it to the Co2 FRAUD which then cooked up Milankovich aka McBULLSHIT

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

 

[Crick]

Obama

Half of you gripe that about his silence on the issue and the other half gripe that he was the leading voice. Get your bullshit stories straight.

 

[Redfish]

The people I listen to on the topic of global warming do not discuss politics, they discuss science. As far as science goes, you, quite obviously, would be the moron.

part of science is observation. Observing our coastlines, the polar ice caps, and worldwide glaciers, the seas are not rising and the ice is not going away. Sure, humans are polluting the air and water, why isn't reducing pollution your goal? Why do you need an unproven link between pollution and climate for your crusade? Think about it, isn't pollution the real problem. But no, you climate fairies must make it a political issue so you can take our money. We see thru the BS, you do not.

 

[Crick]

part of science is observation. Observing our coastlines, the polar ice caps, and worldwide glaciers, the seas are not rising and the ice is not going away.

This tells me that you aren't observing or looking at the findings of anyone that is. The world's oceans are rising and the ice is melting. These are both the unavoidable result of rising global temperatures. And, as they say, science doesn't care what you think.

Sure, humans are polluting the air and water, why isn't reducing pollution your goal?

Why do you think I can have only one goal?

Why do you need an unproven link between pollution and climate for your crusade?

As I say here on an almost daily basis, there are no proofs in the natural sciences. There is evidence. And there is an enormous amount of evidence and basic principles of physics and molecular chemistry that provide the link between human produced CO2 and the warming observed since the Industrial Revolution.

Think about it, isn't pollution the real problem.

Now you seem to be the one who can only handle one problem at a time. Obviously, air and water pollution are problems. So is global warming. So is overpopulation. So are the risks of conventional and nuclear warfare. So is mass starvation. So is forced mass migration. So are pesticides and herbicides in our food. So is stray plastics in our food. So are the replacement of natural flora and fauna with livestock and monoculture. And you think we can only deal with one of those at a time? We must be truly and fully fucked, eh?.

 

[protectionist]

Obama is 63. He probably doesn't have more than 20-25 years left. In that time, sea level probably won't rise more than 12-13 inches. His house is 15 feet above sea level. And just his name on the deed likely doubled the value of the house the day he signed it. So what the fuck are you people going on about?

He's tall (6'1) and thin, and observant of good health. Being wealthy, low stress, top & latest medical advances (stem cells,etc) he could reasonably live to 115.

And he's not as "sure" about the rise of sea level as you are. Nor are any of us sure about how much his house is sinking each year.

Bottom line - his talk about global warming, ice caps melting, sea level rising, was a crock.

Now go wash your mouth out with soap, and come back and report to me.

 

[protectionist]

As I say here on an almost daily basis, there are no proofs in the natural sciences. There is evidence. And there is an enormous amount of evidence and basic principles of physics and molecular chemistry that provide the link between human produced CO2 and the warming observed since the Industrial Revolution.

Informed and non-partisan scientists generally agree that here is global warming, but not to the extent that scaremongers purport.

Quantitative measures create qualitative measures.

 

[Crick]

Informed and non-partisan scientists generally agree that here is global warming, but not to the extent that scaremongers purport.

Quantitative measures create qualitative measures.

And how, precisely, are you separating "informed and non-partisan scientists" and "scaremongers" from people who are neither?

 

[protectionist]

And how, precisely, are you separating "informed and non-partisan scientists" and "scaremongers" from people who are neither?

By the ones whose scientific analyses sound logical/sensible.

 

[Crick]

By the ones whose scientific analyses sound logical/sensible.

Sound logical? Sound sensible? May I ask if you have the qualifications to make those determinations?

 

[ding]

He probably doesn't have more than 20-25 years left. In that time, sea level probably won't rise more than 12-13 inches.

12" to 13" in 20 to 25 years?

What is that? 10 mm/yr? And you acted like no one ever made that claim before.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Can you guarantee that we can keep burning fossil fuels and see no harm?

What are your alternatives? No one has come up with a viable substitute yet.