Greenland ice melt worse than previously believed

[Crick]

There it is. If you don’t subscribe to the climate change (used to be global warming) dogma you’re racist and a bigot. There primitive defects don’t even hide it

You've got that turned around. It's not that AGW deniers tend to be racist bigots. It's that racist bigots tend to be AGW deniers. And, of course in this instance, we have the poster's attitude towards President Obama to put the icing on the cake.

 

[jc456]

next ask him how much new plant life that tiny CO2 increase has created.

Something I never thought about with added plant life is added oxygen to the atmosphere. Does cruck ever state if the amount of O is increasing or decreasing?

 

[Crick]

next ask him how much new plant life that tiny CO2 increase has created.

I just posted this in another thread

CO2 is making Earth greener—for now - NASA Science

A quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

science.nasa.gov

 

[jc456]

I just posted this in another thread

CO2 is making Earth greener—for now - NASA Science

A quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

science.nasa.gov

so, has oxygen levels increased?

 

[Redfish]

Something I never thought about with added plant life is added oxygen to the atmosphere. Does cruck ever state if the amount of O is increasing or decreasing?

of course not, he is a puppet of the left wing climate morons.

 

[Crick]

of course not, he is a puppet of the left wing climate morons.

The people I listen to on the topic of global warming do not discuss politics, they discuss science. As far as science goes, you, quite obviously, would be the moron.

 

[jc456]

The people I listen to on the topic of global warming do not discuss politics, they discuss science. As far as science goes, you, quite obviously, would be the moron.

who do you listen to?

 

[jc456]

The people I listen to on the topic of global warming do not discuss politics, they discuss science. As far as science goes, you, quite obviously, would be the moron.

 

[Crick]

Wow. That is about as stupid as stupid can get. When you pull up your blanket on a cold night, do you get colder? Because your radiated spectrum is going to look exactly like that one he was showing.

 

[jc456]

Wow. That is about as stupid as stupid can get. When you pull up your blanket on a cold night, do you get colder? Because your radiated spectrum is going to look exactly like that one he was showing.

still waiting on who you listen to? why do you hate providing your sources names?

 

[Crick]

still waiting on who you listen to? why do you hate providing your sources names?

What the fuck is wrong with you? I've provided them a hundred times. www.ipcc.ch

 

[jc456]

What the fuck is wrong with you? I've provided them a hundred times. www.ipcc.ch

that's a company, I asked for your sources, the people. I already debunked your IPCC bullshit. No names could I find in their work that were climate scientists. So asked you many months ago for one name. and here we are. I provide names, you call bullshit to the people I provide and yet you can't provide one name. so typical of someone pushing bullshit.

Go ahead and challenge my statement and I will pull the mthr fking thread cuck

 

[jc456]

that's a company, I asked for your sources, the people. I already debunked your IPCC bullshit. No names could I find in their work that were climate scientists. So asked you many months ago for one name. and here we are. I provide names, you call bullshit to the people I provide and yet you can't provide one name. so typical of someone pushing bullshit.

Go ahead and challenge my statement and I will pull the mthr fking thread cuck

Crick , here cuck back in November 2023!!! come on cuck. give us a name, been almost a year.

Back at you, only one will do, name a climate scientist who signed the IPCC report! You sure want but never fking give you wanker

 

[Crick]

Crick , here cuck back in November 2023!!! come on cuck. give us a name, been almost a year.

I'm not responsible for your blithering idiocy.

 

[jc456]

I'm not responsible for your blithering idiocy.

So you can’t give a name. Pathetic

 

[Crick]

that's a company, I asked for your sources, the people. I already debunked your IPCC bullshit. No names could I find in their work that were climate scientists. So asked you many months ago for one name. and here we are. I provide names, you call bullshit to the people I provide and yet you can't provide one name. so typical of someone pushing bullshit.

Go ahead and challenge my statement and I will pull the mthr fking thread cuck

The IPCC is not a company, you blithering idiot.

 

[EMH]

How much “excess heat” is generated by increasing CO2 from .039% to .042%?

What does the lab work show?

What do you think matters more...

The "climate scientists" doing "lab work"

OR

The highly correlated satellite and balloon data



Their definition of "lab work" is a tad on the LOOSE side...

 

[EMH]

Maybe someday Greenland will be green again.

It will... when it moves more than 600 miles away from the north pole...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Orangecat]

Could be. Main had fishing shacks 150 years old taken out by the high tide last week.

Main?

 

[EMH]

Could be. Main had fishing shacks 150 years old taken out by the high tide last week.

Are you claiming OCEAN RISE???

Evidence?

Link?


Always curious about such claims...