Lately some of my views on Christianity have evolved and I wonder if I might be getting closer to "getting it," if you'll just consider this idea. I've recognized that to many Christians their beliefs aren't seen as a problem and also for many it may be something they'll deal with for life, and it isn't reasonable to expect people steeped in it to just up and overcome it. Nor is it even kind to try in many cases.
Just as with obesity, while it's important to teach good health, simply stigmatizing the obese too often leads to cruelty, as the fact remains that millions will be obese for life, either way. Whether one's efforts to lose weight have failed, or whether one has made a life choice to remain how they are, they should be respected and certainly not denied appropriate help when it's reached the stage of disability.
More and more often nowadays the ADA and APA are treating both physical and mental health disorders as only a problem if the patient considers it a problem. Many with diagnoses including dissociative disorders, and even schizophrenia remain high-functioning and do not seek or require help. To add to that, some actually credit schizophrenia as prompting the success of artists like Vincent van Gogh, and yes, even religious leaders like Jesus Christ and Muhammad.
To that effect, if Christians find that they can still lead high functioning lives and aren't impeded by Christianity, why not drop the "religious" legal affiliation and instead, as a society, choose to include Christianity and other theistic religions in a category where they can receive disability services -if needed- and be protected against discrimination? As if Christians aren't already suffering enough believing their loved ones will burn in hell, and that rapture could come any day. Insulting the religion they're stuck with on top of that is hardly a helpful solution.
Jesus needed help and support for his own schizophrenia and instead was cruelly mobbed and killed. And what better way to love and honor a person persecuted simply for having a different brain than most, than to love and honor those with similar mental health disorders in today's world - not just Christians, but Muslims, Jews, Hindhus and so forth - why not offer the safety net of "registered disability" and address the real issue of religion head-on?
Just as with obesity, while it's important to teach good health, simply stigmatizing the obese too often leads to cruelty, as the fact remains that millions will be obese for life, either way. Whether one's efforts to lose weight have failed, or whether one has made a life choice to remain how they are, they should be respected and certainly not denied appropriate help when it's reached the stage of disability.
More and more often nowadays the ADA and APA are treating both physical and mental health disorders as only a problem if the patient considers it a problem. Many with diagnoses including dissociative disorders, and even schizophrenia remain high-functioning and do not seek or require help. To add to that, some actually credit schizophrenia as prompting the success of artists like Vincent van Gogh, and yes, even religious leaders like Jesus Christ and Muhammad.
To that effect, if Christians find that they can still lead high functioning lives and aren't impeded by Christianity, why not drop the "religious" legal affiliation and instead, as a society, choose to include Christianity and other theistic religions in a category where they can receive disability services -if needed- and be protected against discrimination? As if Christians aren't already suffering enough believing their loved ones will burn in hell, and that rapture could come any day. Insulting the religion they're stuck with on top of that is hardly a helpful solution.
Jesus needed help and support for his own schizophrenia and instead was cruelly mobbed and killed. And what better way to love and honor a person persecuted simply for having a different brain than most, than to love and honor those with similar mental health disorders in today's world - not just Christians, but Muslims, Jews, Hindhus and so forth - why not offer the safety net of "registered disability" and address the real issue of religion head-on?
Last edited: