Old Rocks
Diamond Member
The numbers and history showing that even if we have a repeat of the Maunder Minimum, it will make little difference to the warming of the Earth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The numbers and history showing that even if we have a repeat of the Maunder Minimum, it will make little difference to the warming of the Earth.
The numbers and history showing that even if we have a repeat of the Maunder Minimum, it will make little difference to the warming of the Earth.
The numbers and history showing that even if we have a repeat of the Maunder Minimum, it will make little difference to the warming of the Earth.
The numbers and history showing that even if we have a repeat of the Maunder Minimum, it will make little difference to the warming of the Earth.
You are a moron... Antarctic's mass is increasing and its ground temperatures are at theoretical minima -80 deg C (-158 Deg F) were setting records again down south..Ends of the earth are melting but the earth is cooling. Makes sense.
Ends of the earth are melting but the earth is cooling. Makes sense.
You are a moron... Antarctic's mass is increasing and its ground temperatures are at theoretical minima -80 deg C (-158 Deg F) were setting records again down south..Ends of the earth are melting but the earth is cooling. Makes sense.
While we're on the topic, what does the empirical evidence regarding the link between CO2 and temperature, is there ANY measurable increase in temperature when CO2 increases from 280 to 400ppm?You are a moron... Antarctic's mass is increasing and its ground temperatures are at theoretical minima -80 deg C (-158 Deg F) were setting records again down south..Ends of the earth are melting but the earth is cooling. Makes sense.
Noted use of ad hominem and lack of empirical evidence. Very scientist presentation of facts. LMBO
LOL... noted failure to think or use cognitive thought process...You are a moron... Antarctic's mass is increasing and its ground temperatures are at theoretical minima -80 deg C (-158 Deg F) were setting records again down south..Ends of the earth are melting but the earth is cooling. Makes sense.
Noted use of ad hominem and lack of empirical evidence. Very scientist presentation of facts. LMBO
You are a moron... Antarctic's mass is increasing and its ground temperatures are at theoretical minima -80 deg C (-158 Deg F) were setting records again down south..Ends of the earth are melting but the earth is cooling. Makes sense.
Noted use of ad hominem and lack of empirical evidence. Very scientist presentation of facts. LMBO
Dear Lord people, not one human being can give a logical, rational explanation of how the average temperature of planet Earth is derived today. And yet we're going to argue the temperature today vs 20 yrs ago, 100 yrs ago, 1000 yrs ago, 10,000 yrs ago? What afriggin joke.
If you listen to planetary scientists, they have no interest in surface temps. They are interested in the atmosphere. Funny that the only info we get from "climate scientists" is surface. Funny that.Dear Lord people, not one human being can give a logical, rational explanation of how the average temperature of planet Earth is derived today. And yet we're going to argue the temperature today vs 20 yrs ago, 100 yrs ago, 1000 yrs ago, 10,000 yrs ago? What afriggin joke.
I have often wondered of what value anyone thinks an "average global temperature" is on a planet whose daily maximum and minimum temperatures span 200+ degrees...not counting the fact that most of the earth's surface is not covered by data stations so most of the "average" consists of fabricated temperatures.
The real question is of what use are surface temps? Surface temps are basically useless on a global scale. Particularly when you do not have long term global coverage. I get into this argument all the time. Current surface temps are worthless, both from a surface temps tell us nothing of the global situation and we have nothing to compare it from the past anyway.Dear Lord people, not one human being can give a logical, rational explanation of how the average temperature of planet Earth is derived today. And yet we're going to argue the temperature today vs 20 yrs ago, 100 yrs ago, 1000 yrs ago, 10,000 yrs ago? What afriggin joke.
I have often wondered of what value anyone thinks an "average global temperature" is on a planet whose daily maximum and minimum temperatures span 200+ degrees...not counting the fact that most of the earth's surface is not covered by data stations so most of the "average" consists of fabricated temperatures.
The real question is of what use are surface temps? Surface temps are basically useless on a global scale. Particularly when you do not have long term global coverage. I get into this argument all the time. Current surface temps are worthless, both from a surface temps tell us nothing of the global situation and we have nothing to compare it from the past anyway.Dear Lord people, not one human being can give a logical, rational explanation of how the average temperature of planet Earth is derived today. And yet we're going to argue the temperature today vs 20 yrs ago, 100 yrs ago, 1000 yrs ago, 10,000 yrs ago? What afriggin joke.
I have often wondered of what value anyone thinks an "average global temperature" is on a planet whose daily maximum and minimum temperatures span 200+ degrees...not counting the fact that most of the earth's surface is not covered by data stations so most of the "average" consists of fabricated temperatures.