Gott-damned Polar Bears are climate deniers too!

justoffal

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
38,394
Reaction score
31,321
Points
2,905
Gore, Ocasio-Cortez, and Thunberg, three people who have played an influential role on this front ... and .. forecasted the Earth would have already been destroyed. Seems more like a ploy to increase $$$ without the factual backing to support their claims.
 
1769990540234.webp

~S~
 
Polar bears are zero threats to humans.
 
Sigh...... When are these big fluffy assholes going to learn that they have to play their part?

Polar bears are actually a relatively recent species. Evolving from brown bears no more than two glacial cycles ago. With most evidence only dating back to the last glacial cycle.

I actually believe along with others that they are a species that likely comes and goes during glacial and interglacial cycles. And unlike popular belief, during the ice ages they likely did not live where they are found now. A lot of polar bear fossils have been located in England, Siberia, and coastal Greenland. All of which were relatively ice free when they died.

And their species can only spread as far as it has because of the interglacials. In fact, the species is not native to Alaska and Canada at all. They evolved in Europe, and actually did not enter North America until after humans did, around 10 kya. And have only been allowed to extend their range so far because the ice cap is mostly gone.

They do not actually live for extended periods of time on the ice, but because of their adaptations they are clearly the apex pioneer predator along the edges of the ice fields. And if they were ever to vanish, the advantage of their coloring would also vanish and they would return to being slightly larger brown bears with strange fur.
 
Polar bears are actually a relatively recent species. Evolving from brown bears no more than two glacial cycles ago. With most evidence only dating back to the last glacial cycle.

I actually believe along with others that they are a species that likely comes and goes during glacial and interglacial cycles. And unlike popular belief, during the ice ages they likely did not live where they are found now. A lot of polar bear fossils have been located in England, Siberia, and coastal Greenland. All of which were relatively ice free when they died.

And their species can only spread as far as it has because of the interglacials. In fact, the species is not native to Alaska and Canada at all. They evolved in Europe, and actually did not enter North America until after humans did, around 10 kya. And have only been allowed to extend their range so far because the ice cap is mostly gone.

They do not actually live for extended periods of time on the ice, but because of their adaptations they are clearly the apex pioneer predator along the edges of the ice fields. And if they were ever to vanish, the advantage of their coloring would also vanish and they would return to being slightly larger brown bears with strange fur.

Polar bears and brown bears are sister taxons ... and produce fertile offspring in the wild ... the Sitka Brown Bear appears to be a thriving population of these hybrids living in SE Alaska ... and these two are sister to the black bears ... and again, fertile hybrids are known in captivity ... though I can't find any information about wild hybrid black/brown combinations ... if you believe in that evolution stuff ...
 
Polar bears and brown bears are sister taxons ... and produce fertile offspring in the wild ... the Sitka Brown Bear appears to be a thriving population of these hybrids living in SE Alaska ... and these two are sister to the black bears ... and again, fertile hybrids are known in captivity ... though I can't find any information about wild hybrid black/brown combinations ... if you believe in that evolution stuff ...
Latent trait blossoming in semi autonomous gene pool....
 
Latent trait blossoming in semi autonomous gene pool....

Or is it as simple as latitude? ... white-furred bears survive to reproduce better than brown-furred bears on the ice fields ... and vice versa ...

I think Mushroom is on the right track ... if they go extinct now, they'll re-evolve when the ice sheets return ... nature doesn't allow ecological niches to go unfulfilled ... as long as there's delicious fur-seal pups on an ice floe ... something will come and try to eat it ... "it's the circle of life, young Simba" ...
 
Or is it as simple as latitude? ... white-furred bears survive to reproduce better than brown-furred bears on the ice fields ... and vice versa ...

I think Mushroom is on the right track ... if they go extinct now, they'll re-evolve when the ice sheets return ... nature doesn't allow ecological niches to go unfulfilled ... as long as there's delicious fur-seal pups on an ice floe ... something will come and try to eat it ... "it's the circle of life, young Simba" ...
Yes.... basically the the multi-tool of genetic variety...

When no longer advantageous the trait recedes in deference to those that are.

In his book "The Beak of the Finch" Peter Grant documented the changes in bird beaks over the course of changing Time/environments in the Galapagos Islands.
 
Back
Top Bottom