GOP Senator..."tough shit" for the unemployed

Status
Not open for further replies.
this will still be going on a year from now and more money will be needed.
As I said it makes no difference if this is on Visa or Mastercard.



Good grief if you really don't know what the difference is between using the money you're already in debt for or going further into debt you should probably apply at the DNC for a job.

You mean the RNC don't ya?
Financing about 1 trillion for a war off the budget.


Nope. The Dems are currently in charge and they're the ones wanting to borrow MORE money when they're already sitting on a pile of unused borrowed cash. And try to stay on topic. The war has nothing to do with Bunning being unwilling to sign on to yet more borrowing for extending UE benefits.
 
Well, let's use as a benchmark the money we spent killing Iraqis...American families deserve at least as much...it is THEIR money.

Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 22, 2007

CHICAGO, Sept. 21 -- The money spent on one day of the Iraq war could buy homes for almost 6,500 families or health care for 423,529 children, or could outfit 1.27 million homes with renewable electricity, according to the American Friends Service Committee, which displayed those statistics on large banners in cities nationwide Thursday and Friday.

The war is costing $720 million a day or $500,000 a minute, according to the group's analysis of the work of Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph E. Stiglitz and Harvard public finance lecturer Linda J. Bilmes.

so why doesn't your asswipe stop wasting money in Iraq and Afghanistan???

Sounds like a plan...I'm SURE you right wingers will support pulling our troops out...

I sure as **** do.
 
The responses from the right on this thread reveals a truth about conservatism today. It is social conservatism cloaked in fiscal concern. The authoritarian follower takes delight in punishment.

The Republican Party is dominated by authoritarian personalities. They continue to give us a glimpse of how cruel they will rule if they regain power.

My hope is the American people will not reward their anti Americanism and their disregard for human beings. They share the same personality markers as terrorists...


But what is liberty without wisdom, and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils; for it is folly, vice, and madness, without tuition or restraint.
Edmund Burke


So what exactly is your problem with Bunning wanting to pay for the extention with already borrowed stimulus money? How does that make him a "domestic terrorist"?
 
LMAO, and how you would whine about cutting the defense spending.

I've never whined about cutting spending. I think it's a good idea to cut all spending.

Are you honestly suggesting that if we don't spend trillions of dollars we don't have our nation will collapse? There isnt any waste in what we are currently spending? There isnt a single way we can make this government more efficient?
 
So what exactly is your problem with Bunning wanting to pay for the extention with already borrowed stimulus money? How does that make him a "domestic terrorist"?

It makes him a domestic terrorist because its a convenient label to use to marginalize his opponents among those who don't think about the subject. That way he doesnt have to actually argue his points to convince them to support him.
 
LMAO, and how you would whine about cutting the defense spending.

I've never whined about cutting spending. I think it's a good idea to cut all spending.

Are you honestly suggesting that if we don't spend trillions of dollars we don't have our nation will collapse? There isnt any waste in what we are currently spending? There isnt a single way we can make this government more efficient?

the overspending has delayed where we are now, and since about 30% of America is paid by the govt either directly or indirectly cutting spending drastically now would be the final nail in the coffin.
 
wow, we have our own Baghdad Bob of propaganda right here on this board..

Is there ANYTHING these right wing scum bags do that you don't go along with?

Friday, February 6, 2009

Texas Republican Congressman Pete Sessions compares GOP strategy to Taliban insurgency.


Pete_Sessions.jpg



"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban, and that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

Congressman Pete Sessions Compares House Republicans To Taliban | Capitol Annex

I've read elsewhere that the tactic is to make the nation ungovernable. It seems to be working.
 
LMAO, and how you would whine about cutting the defense spending.

I've never whined about cutting spending. I think it's a good idea to cut all spending.

Are you honestly suggesting that if we don't spend trillions of dollars we don't have our nation will collapse? There isnt any waste in what we are currently spending? There isnt a single way we can make this government more efficient?

the overspending has delayed where we are now, and since about 30% of America is paid by the govt either directly or indirectly cutting spending drastically now would be the final nail in the coffin.

Good. let's kill this abusive government and create one that follows the Constitution.
 
wow, we have our own Baghdad Bob of propaganda right here on this board..

Is there ANYTHING these right wing scum bags do that you don't go along with?

Friday, February 6, 2009

Texas Republican Congressman Pete Sessions compares GOP strategy to Taliban insurgency.


Pete_Sessions.jpg



"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban, and that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

Congressman Pete Sessions Compares House Republicans To Taliban | Capitol Annex

I've read elsewhere that the tactic is to make the nation ungovernable. It seems to be working.

I believe the term is disaster capitalism. Grover Norquist, the GOP's radical economic guru wants to smash government down to the size he can drown in a bathtub. The people IN that bathtub are WE the People...
 
Hell with it, why don't we give them unemployment benefits for life.

If you ever get fired, I really hope you donate your unemployment check to a charity. I know the money is yours but you have ZERO compassion. Typical republican.
I've got no problem with the concept of unemployment. I've got a problem with it's scope. It pays out way too much for way too long. If the benefits were limited to somewhere around minimum wage for maybe 6-9 months instead of a year, then great. But when unemployment pays almost as much as you were making at your last job while employers simply don't have the overhead to hire as many workers for those previous wages, people start to look at unemployment as a career... and that's just sickening to me.

I see you equate problems with unemployment compensation with min. wagers...


Karma is a *****. Good luck sir.
 
I posted this video in #60 and showed it to a Republican colleague today at work. She said, "What's the big deal? Welfare and Food stamps are what you get when no one will help you".
I said, "when you get food stamps and welfare, then someone IS helping you, the government"."
She said, "That doesn't count. This country isn't going to let people starve". And I said, "No, you're wrong. When Republicans say they want government to stop helping people, this is what they are talking about". She said, "That's ridiculous. What kind of people do you think we are?"

THEN,

I showed her the comments from SCs Lt. Governor, referring to poor children in school, "Don't feed them, they'll breed! the lieutenant governor of South Carolina has compared schoolchildren who eat free lunches, to stray animals ..."

The shock on her face was priceless. Simply priceless.

You can't make this shit up.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTwpBLzxe4U]YouTube - Craig T. Nelson on Government Aid[/ame]
 
People, when they get really rich, tend to become conservatives, so surprising that they would give the most donation.

How many of those conservatives wouldn't help someone who had a illegitmate kid? a black inner city family? Or whatever they deem is "immoral" and people that are not worthy of charity? If we did it the conservative wya, there would be many people left out of recieving help because of the holier than thou, judgemental group that is plentiful in the conservative group

they are plentiful in the Dems too.....
 
It'd be nice to see details on just the kind of people who would receive said "benefits." I've heard some pretty hilariously troubling horror stories about people on unemployment lately with my cousin being a recruiter.

It will be interesting if there is a republican in here who's unemployment check will just not be there next month. I wonder what he would say about the republicans.

Damn.
Who knows. All i know is that most conservatives tend to take care of themselves rather than looking for someone else to take care of them.





Yeah it's WAY better to let your children STARVE and force your family into HOMELESSNESS than to take unemployment insurance!
 
Yeah it's WAY better to let your children STARVE and force your family into HOMELESSNESS than to take unemployment insurance!

It's even better to plan ahead and prepare for hard times before they are thrust upon you so you dont have to make such a decision.
 
15th post
Yeah it's WAY better to let your children STARVE and force your family into HOMELESSNESS than to take unemployment insurance!

It's even better to plan ahead and prepare for hard times before they are thrust upon you so you dont have to make such a decision.

Thanks for making the case for "Planned Parenthood". Republicans everywhere will thank you::udaman:

It's fairly easy to avoid having a child if you don't want one. Don't have sex. But that is completely irrelevant to this current conversation. Nor does it actually support planned parenthood because abortion is not planning ahead. It's a "Holy crap! I'm immature and cant take responsibility for my actions" move that happens after the real decision has already been made.

However, Ill note your complete hypocrisy that you believe planning ahead is good in that case but we should just be completely irresponsible with money and future.
 
It's even better to plan ahead and prepare for hard times before they are thrust upon you so you dont have to make such a decision.

Thanks for making the case for "Planned Parenthood". Republicans everywhere will thank you::udaman:

It's fairly easy to avoid having a child if you don't want one. Don't have sex. But that is completely irrelevant to this current conversation. Nor does it actually support planned parenthood because abortion is not planning ahead. It's a "Holy crap! I'm immature and cant take responsibility for my actions" move that happens after the real decision has already been made.

However, Ill note your complete hypocrisy that you believe planning ahead is good in that case but we should just be completely irresponsible with money and future.

Planning ahead? You mean like Bush and the Republicans planned ahead after "Mission Accomplished"? or "al Qaeda determined to attack inside the US"? of the aftermath of Katrina?

Nope, Republicans, for all the talk are not only not good at planning ahead, they are failures at it.
 
wow, we have our own Baghdad Bob of propaganda right here on this board..

Is there ANYTHING these right wing scum bags do that you don't go along with?

Friday, February 6, 2009





So.can you answer the question or not? What would be the problem with paying for extended benefits out of the dem slush.. err.. stimulus funds?


I see no problem with it.

Everyone else has had their hands in the cookie jar.....why not the unemployed who are at the bottom of the proverbial hill (you know, where the shit rolls to)??

I mean we've extended these funds to all those corporations that were "too big to fail", why not do the same for millions of families that are "too small and unimportant to end up homeless"?

I mean really. Why not? What's the hold up? Or is the point WHO is the hold up?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom