No, the point of the article was to show that the statement, all oil would be directly exported was "false". But I am here to tell you, that oil would not have benefited us in any way other than perhaps displacing oil from South America. While you might patronize me with the quip, "Most people like yourself. They don't understand the market", I assure you that you are totally off base. I understand the market intuitively. The reality is that refineries in the Gulf anticipated Keystone and increased capacity for diesel production accordingly. I noticed you had nothing to say about diesel costing more than gasoline, and being a former truck driver, that is kind of sad.
The whole "market" thing is a total copout. It doesn't have to be that way, and honestly, it shouldn't. Damn skippy, we could be totally energy independent. And while economic reasons are enough to make that happen, national security reasons indicate that it should be of paramount importance. What part of "America first" do you not understand? The reality is it is not America first, it is stockholders of oil companies first, and that is FUBARED.
Have you looked? Have you looked at diesel exports? How the hell does that make sense? Diesel is cheaper in Brazil, Mexico, and most of South America, and it is OUR DIESEL. That is mind numbing. What country does that? You, I, and every American pays more because of the inflated cost of diesel. For what reason? To pad the bottom line of the oil companies and refineries?