Gone- But Not Forgotten

[Vagabond63]

L. Pl

Not at all, YOU made the accusation that I had offended Jewish people, I merely asked who? and how?

Show me the offending statement.

Post #299

You are likening that to Tommy Robinson and the Pakistani Muslims of Rotherham? Seriously?

And I, as a Jew, find those comparisons to Nazi times, sickening and offensive.

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

I think this has as much relevence now as it did then, I've just "updated" it a bit,

"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Muslims, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Muslim.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."---Martin Niemöller

 

[Mindful]

L. Pl

Not at all, YOU made the accusation that I had offended Jewish people, I merely asked who? and how?

Show me the offending statement.

Post #299

You are likening that to Tommy Robinson and the Pakistani Muslims of Rotherham? Seriously?

And I, as a Jew, find those comparisons to Nazi times, sickening and offensive.

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

 

[Dogmaphobe]

By listening to these repulsive child rape defenders, one would almost think Jews were running all over Europe raping children, such idiotic comparisons the sick, twisted things are making.

How utterly beneath contempt to reference the holocaust in order to support the rape of thousands and thousands of children.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

L. Pl

Show me the offending statement.

Post #299

You are likening that to Tommy Robinson and the Pakistani Muslims of Rotherham? Seriously?

And I, as a Jew, find those comparisons to Nazi times, sickening and offensive.

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

I think this has as much relevence now as it did then, I've just "updated" it a bit,

"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Muslims, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Muslim.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."---Martin Niemöller

You refuse to speak for the children being raped as an expression of ethnic persecution and you have the audacity to post this, you sick freak!

 

[Coyote]

L. Pl

Show me the offending statement.

Post #299

You are likening that to Tommy Robinson and the Pakistani Muslims of Rotherham? Seriously?

And I, as a Jew, find those comparisons to Nazi times, sickening and offensive.

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

 

[Mindful]

L. Pl

Post #299

You are likening that to Tommy Robinson and the Pakistani Muslims of Rotherham? Seriously?

And I, as a Jew, find those comparisons to Nazi times, sickening and offensive.

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

L. Pl

You are likening that to Tommy Robinson and the Pakistani Muslims of Rotherham? Seriously?

And I, as a Jew, find those comparisons to Nazi times, sickening and offensive.

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

 

[Mindful]

L. Pl

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

2019 is not 1937.

More like 1478.

 

[Coyote]

L. Pl

You are likening that to Tommy Robinson and the Pakistani Muslims of Rotherham? Seriously?

And I, as a Jew, find those comparisons to Nazi times, sickening and offensive.

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Yet you support Yaxley who’s actions are directed at Muslims (not just Paki’s), you seem to support the same rhetoric that was once directed at Jews, and is now directed at Muslims. You dodge the equivalency in tone, rhetoric, public and political sentiment that was present in the 1930’s and proclaim it false moral equivalence despite its obvious similarities.

I just find it really strange that who’s people were so brutally persecuted seems to support the same canards, rhetoric and promotion of stereotypes when directed against today’s target of choice.

It seems to me that hate and scapegoating should not be supported even benignly. When these factions are done with immigrants and Muslims, they will turn on the Jews again. It is simmering there right below the surface and governments today are scrambling to give them legitimate platforms.

That is what Yaxley represents. Not children. Not victims. But a scapegoat.

 

[Coyote]

L. Pl
This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

2019 is not 1937.

More like 1478.

I think 1937 is accurate. Look at the rise of rightwing populism around the world. Look at the rise in nativism and religious nationalism. None of those bode well for minorities.

 

[Coyote]

L. Pl

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

Like you accuse opponents of supporting child rape eh?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

L. Pl
This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

Like you accuse opponents of supporting child rape eh?

Your fellow Muslims imprison and gang rape thousands of British children, and you defend that by treating it as inconsequential and the negative reaction to it the product of prejudice. Meanwhile, you point to one single Arab boy who was misidentified and then punched in the face as something MUCH more important to you than the mere rape of a few thousand Kaffir children.

Yes, you are a child rape supporter. You are a child rape defender, a child rape facilitator and a child rape enabler.

Have I made myself clear?

 

[Coyote]

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

Like you accuse opponents of supporting child rape eh?

Your fellow Muslims imprison and gang rape thousands of British children, and you defend that by treating it as inconsequential and the negative reaction to it the product of prejudice. Meanwhile, you point to one single Arab boy who was misidentified and then punched in the face as something MUCH more important to you than the mere rape of a few thousand Kaffir children.

Yes, you are a child rape supporter. You are a child rape defender, a child rape facilitator and a child rape enabler.

Have I made myself clear?

Thank you for clarifying what a joke you are.

It is impossible to take some one seriously who uses the brutal crime of child rape to further his own program of systemic demonization of particular ethnic groups. If you truly cared about these kids I would think you would be demanding that some sort of attention be brought onto their circumstances. Why were they vulnerable? Why were they largely ignored? These weren’t upper class or middle class kids. What is being done to prevent this from happening again? Because it will. These kids are vulnerable to traffickers be they Muslim or anyone else. They are they same kids being preyed on all over the world. The thing is I never see you address that. Dont you want to stop it? Prosecuting the groomers and perpetrators is a good step, but that isn’t going to stop a new bunch coming in and promising the world to these broken kids and then abusing them. Don’t you care about stopping the cycle, or do you only care about targeting Muslims.

When the infamous American pedo Larry Nasser was caught, where was your ounce of concern for his hundreds of victims? Your concern was to post an article falsely claiming Nasser to be a Muslim!

If you care, you need to address the factors that make these kids vulnerable at the same as you need to place good community policing above of “political sensitivity”. And you need to properly fund it. That is something the rightists are loathe to do just as the leftists are to PC about it.

 

[Mindful]

L. Pl

Wow. The atrocity that was inflicted on Europe’s Jewish population at the hands of the Nazis beggars belief both in its scale and savagery. As you well know the Holocaust didn’t happen all in one fell swoop, it was incremental, designed initially to “encourage” German Jews to leave Germany. Part of this campaign was a sustained propaganda effort that demonised Jews in Germany, comparing them to sewer rats, perverts and degenerates of all types.

Spin it any way you like, but the fact remains that there are chilling but valid comparisons to be made with far-Right propaganda against Muslims in both this country and the USA, with similar propaganda disseminated by the Nazis in the 1930’s and 40’s. Which is why I’m surprised that as a Jewish person yourself, you should take offence.

Surely the cry of “Never again!” should apply to any minority group and we should all be vigilant and stand up to anyone espousing or inciting religious or racial/ethnic hatred.

Are there evil Muslims? Of course there are, but that doesn’t mean all Muslims are evil. The same applies to Jewish people, Christians, Atheists, Hindus, etc.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon IS a thug and a criminal, as well as being a racist and white supremacist. Invoke Godwin’s Law till you’re blue in the face but to me, that makes him a modern day Nazi.

This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Yet you support Yaxley who’s actions are directed at Muslims (not just Paki’s), you seem to support the same rhetoric that was once directed at Jews, and is now directed at Muslims. You dodge the equivalency in tone, rhetoric, public and political sentiment that was present in the 1930’s and proclaim it false moral equivalence despite its obvious similarities.

I just find it really strange that who’s people were so brutally persecuted seems to support the same canards, rhetoric and promotion of stereotypes when directed against today’s target of choice.

It seems to me that hate and scapegoating should not be supported even benignly. When these factions are done with immigrants and Muslims, they will turn on the Jews again. It is simmering there right below the surface and governments today are scrambling to give them legitimate platforms.

That is what Yaxley represents. Not children. Not victims. But a scapegoat.

We're talking on two different platforms here. You are accusing me of all manner of heinous activities. When I've stated over and over again that Tommy Robinson us standing up to the British establishment for its appalling handling of the Rotherham scandal.

I am not demonising Muslims!

 

[Mindful]

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

2019 is not 1937.

More like 1478.

I think 1937 is accurate. Look at the rise of rightwing populism around the world. Look at the rise in nativism and religious nationalism. None of those bode well for minorities.

It is nothing like 1937.

 

[Coyote]

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

2019 is not 1937.

More like 1478.

I think 1937 is accurate. Look at the rise of rightwing populism around the world. Look at the rise in nativism and religious nationalism. None of those bode well for minorities.

It is nothing like 1937.

The rhetoric and the demonization against immigrants absolutely is. The question how far will it go? That is the key difference.

 

[Mindful]

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

2019 is not 1937.

More like 1478.

I think 1937 is accurate. Look at the rise of rightwing populism around the world. Look at the rise in nativism and religious nationalism. None of those bode well for minorities.

It is nothing like 1937.

The rhetoric and the demonization against immigrants absolutely is. The question how far will it go? That is the key difference.

It absolutely isn't. And it's a different topic to the Rotherham issue.

 

[Coyote]

L. Pl
This is what I dont understand, that some who's own people suffered horrific persecution can stand by and seemingly support the demonization and persecution of other groups using the same tactics.

I never thought something like the holocaust could ever be repeated but now I am not so sure. I am wstching the erosion and destruction of the institutions and values that protected us from such an event, the rise of rightwing populist authoritarians around the world and the ramping up of divisive demonizing rhetoric.

You dont have to like the targeted groups, but if you are going to stand by and support it, you need to ask yourself who will be next ? No minority is truely safe from these sentiments.

That's right.

The left wing newspapers are full of it:

More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'

Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.

Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.

You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.

Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.

There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?

I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.

How can you buy into it?

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Yet you support Yaxley who’s actions are directed at Muslims (not just Paki’s), you seem to support the same rhetoric that was once directed at Jews, and is now directed at Muslims. You dodge the equivalency in tone, rhetoric, public and political sentiment that was present in the 1930’s and proclaim it false moral equivalence despite its obvious similarities.

I just find it really strange that who’s people were so brutally persecuted seems to support the same canards, rhetoric and promotion of stereotypes when directed against today’s target of choice.

It seems to me that hate and scapegoating should not be supported even benignly. When these factions are done with immigrants and Muslims, they will turn on the Jews again. It is simmering there right below the surface and governments today are scrambling to give them legitimate platforms.

That is what Yaxley represents. Not children. Not victims. But a scapegoat.

We're talking on two different platforms here. You are accusing me of all manner of heinous activities. When I've stated over and over again that Tommy Robinson us standing up to the British establishment for its appalling handling of the Rotherham scandal.

I am not demonising Muslims!

Yet Yaxley actively demonizes Muslims. He falsely targeted a refugee child. Because he was a Muslim immigrant and Yaxley was riding high on the “immigrants/Muslims” are rapists bandwagon. How is scapegoating standing up to the establishment?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.

This of yours:


"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."

This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

2019 is not 1937.

More like 1478.

I think 1937 is accurate. Look at the rise of rightwing populism around the world. Look at the rise in nativism and religious nationalism. None of those bode well for minorities.

It is nothing like 1937.

The rhetoric and the demonization against immigrants absolutely is. The question how far will it go? That is the key difference.

I know you hate Jews, but Jews were not raping thousands of kids in the 30s.

You only dredge up the holocaust because you support your fellow Muslims raping kids and have seized upon a particularly diabolical way to try to trick gullible people into joining you.

 

[Coyote]

Be careful, mindful.

If you don't join the child rape support squad you will get called a Nazi.

Islamists learned this trick back during their days of collaborating with the real Nazis. It's an agitprop technique called turnspeak where people are accused of the very thing embodied by the accuser.

2019 is not 1937.

More like 1478.

I think 1937 is accurate. Look at the rise of rightwing populism around the world. Look at the rise in nativism and religious nationalism. None of those bode well for minorities.

It is nothing like 1937.

The rhetoric and the demonization against immigrants absolutely is. The question how far will it go? That is the key difference.

It absolutely isn't. And it's a different topic to the Rotherham issue.

No, it is intertwined with Rotherham.