Gone Are The Days

[Daryl Hunt]

There is no such thing as anti white racism. The rest of #35 is pure idiocy.

Now.....watch me completely eviscerate you yet again:

It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics

It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics





"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White





“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.” https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2018/10/28/white-male-bashing-trend-dangerous-saritha-prabhu-column/1778385002/



NYT Pulitzer Prize Winner: White Race ‘Barbaric’ Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones once penned a polemical letter to her college newspaper denouncing the white race as "barbaric."
"The white race is the biggest murderer, rapist, pillager, and thief of the modern world," she wrote in a 1995 letter published in the Notre Dame Observer, according to a report by the Federalist. She added that white Europeans "committed genocide … in their greed and insatiable desire to destroy every non-white culture." NYT Pulitzer Prize Winner: White Race ‘Barbaric’







“NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech

More and more, it seems Democrats are proving to be exactly who many conservatives always thought they were.

Offering a disturbingly divisive message Monday to mark the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams let newcomers know that they are not welcome in New York City, according to the New York Post.

White newcomers from the nation’s heartland, of course — as those coming illegally from south of the border continue to receive a warm embrace in the sanctuary city. NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech




"The Lawless Anti-White Identity Politics of the Democratic Party Is on Full Display in Philly"

The Lawless Anti-White Identity Politics of the Democratic Party Is on Full Display in Philly | National Review

Democrats featuring Black Lives Matter activists and illegal aliens at the convention are playing a harmful racial-idenity politics game.

www.nationalreview.com

"Democrats Unify Around Shutting Down White People"

Democrats Unify Around Shutting Down White People

Democrats are amping up the anti-white rhetoric in the wake of their electoral defeat

dailycaller.com

You must enjoy the beatings I administer to you on a daily basis.

What does your psychiatrist say about it?

One of the reasons it should be known that you are a paid poster is that you can come up with the rtwingnutjob links so quickly. Someone else has done the work and you are just cutting and pasting. You are a paid poster.

or----she has lots of info in her head or is a quick searcher

Her posts are too frequent and with way too much information always from rtwingnutjob sites. I don't believe in coincidence on this one.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

for the record------chic's comments about DEMOCRATS are absolutely correct in reference to both post civil war SOUTH and to PRESENT
DEMOCRATS in general

The problem with the Party of the Rumpers is you want us to believe you are Republicans (you aren't) And you have no idea the Republican Parties history. If you did, you wouldn't post this nonsense.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

And I won't hold it against you as being a paid Political poster either.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

for the record------chic's comments about DEMOCRATS are absolutely correct in reference to both post civil war SOUTH and to PRESENT
DEMOCRATS in general

Actually they are disingenuous given the fact that republicans were complicit in everything post civil war and it is the party of racism today.

And that was from the first time the Republican Party was hijacked. We are not living in the 2nd time the Republican Party has been hijacked just by an even more rightwing (Fascist) side this time instead of a bunch of rich Corporates like last time. One thing Ike did was to clean up the Republican Party but just a few years later, it drifted again into where it is today. We need to have another retire War Hero as a Republican President once again.

 

[Magnus]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

LOL. Do you really think doing a cut/paste job is going to scare me? You really are a moron.

I ask you again, "What has the Black-on-Black violence to do with police brutality"?

One is random and the other is a systemic murder by an organized police force who instead of doing their duty to protect & serve are killing Black folks.

Try again, sis. You may need to go back to the trumptard talking-points book to bring back a cogent response. I'll wait.

 

[irosie91]

There is no such thing as anti white racism. The rest of #35 is pure idiocy.

Now.....watch me completely eviscerate you yet again:

It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics

It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics





"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White

… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White





“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.” https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2018/10/28/white-male-bashing-trend-dangerous-saritha-prabhu-column/1778385002/



NYT Pulitzer Prize Winner: White Race ‘Barbaric’ Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones once penned a polemical letter to her college newspaper denouncing the white race as "barbaric."
"The white race is the biggest murderer, rapist, pillager, and thief of the modern world," she wrote in a 1995 letter published in the Notre Dame Observer, according to a report by the Federalist. She added that white Europeans "committed genocide … in their greed and insatiable desire to destroy every non-white culture." NYT Pulitzer Prize Winner: White Race ‘Barbaric’







“NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech

More and more, it seems Democrats are proving to be exactly who many conservatives always thought they were.

Offering a disturbingly divisive message Monday to mark the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams let newcomers know that they are not welcome in New York City, according to the New York Post.

White newcomers from the nation’s heartland, of course — as those coming illegally from south of the border continue to receive a warm embrace in the sanctuary city. NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech




"The Lawless Anti-White Identity Politics of the Democratic Party Is on Full Display in Philly"

The Lawless Anti-White Identity Politics of the Democratic Party Is on Full Display in Philly | National Review

Democrats featuring Black Lives Matter activists and illegal aliens at the convention are playing a harmful racial-idenity politics game.

www.nationalreview.com

"Democrats Unify Around Shutting Down White People"

Democrats Unify Around Shutting Down White People

Democrats are amping up the anti-white rhetoric in the wake of their electoral defeat

dailycaller.com

You must enjoy the beatings I administer to you on a daily basis.

What does your psychiatrist say about it?

One of the reasons it should be known that you are a paid poster is that you can come up with the rtwingnutjob links so quickly. Someone else has done the work and you are just cutting and pasting. You are a paid poster.

or----she has lots of info in her head or is a quick searcher

Her posts are too frequent and with way too much information always from rtwingnutjob sites. I don't believe in coincidence on this one.

I don't see what you are calling "coincidence"

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Which Is Failing To Own Up To What "

* Gaining An Accurate Frame Of Reference And Scope *

Whites got most of the welfare. Racism is what determines wages. In 1992, white gangs were the majority of gangs in this country. The so called liberal media didn't report that, nor did they report how republicans put crack in black communities.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics “showed that during the period of 1990 to 2008, 53% of gang homicides were committed by white offenders and 56.5% of gang homicide victims were white.”

White-on-White Crime: The Hidden Truth - Decoded Science

Crime affects every neighborhood – not just the urban areas. Image by Dodgerton Skillhause The ... Read MoreWhite-on-White Crime: The Hidden Truth

decodedscience.org

Republicans are responsible for a generation of crack babies, crackheads and drug related violence in black communities. So STFU with this retarded bs.

Notice that in 1980 to 2008 FBI report - https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf ( table 7 ) , there is only black and white and there is not brown , and also note that the statistics only report the percentage of victims and percentage of offenders , but does not correlate the race of the offender with the race of the victim , and the ratio of homicides given the percentage of the total population needs to be included in an analysis of propensity for a crime to occur .

Figures 19 , 20a and 20b graph the relationship between white on white , black or black , white on black and black on white homicides for which the following summary is included :

Most murders were intraracial
From 1980 through 2008—
84% of white victims were killed by whites
( Figure 19)
93% of black victims were killed by blacks.

Stranger homicides were more likely to cross racial lines than
homicides involving friends or acquaintances
For homicides committed by—
a stranger to the victim, 26.7% were interracial
( Figure 20a)
a friend or acquaintance of the victim, 9.7% were interracial
( Figure 20b)

Figures 20a and 20b clearly indicate that more whites were killed by blacks than the converse , which leads one to justifiably challenge claims by BLaMe that evidence exists where whites disproportionately killed blacks , as such a claim is clearly false and in fact blacks killed more whites whether the victims were known or strangers .

* New Rivals To Blacks Lumped In As White *

Gangs in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In 1999, Hispanic Americans accounted for 47% of all U.S. gang members, African Americans for 34%, non-Hispanic whites for 13%, and Asians for 6%.[55]

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Aristocracy Versus Proletariat Contention For Resources "

* Better To Use Descriptors Wisely Than Be Deceived In Confusion *

Actually they are disingenuous given the fact that republicans were complicit in everything post civil war and it is the party of racism today.

There is no such thing as the republican party being the party of racism and any such proponents are practicing the highest level of political science ignorance , which in my opinion contributes to the current break down in how to effectively address and process directions in public policy .

The republican party is supposedly more aligned economic liberalism ( economic libertarian ) and social conservatives ( civil authoritarian ) , while the democrats are supposedly more aligned with economic conservatism ( economic authoritarian ) and social liberalism ( civil libertarian ) .

It does not make any sense to associate either party with either conservatism or liberalism , with either authoritarianism or libertarianism , as such terms more accurately apply to political policies , that are often contentious in the accuracy of their actions with respect to government .

For example ;
1 ) gun control is a social conservative policy based in civil authoritarianism
2 ) abortion is a social liberalism policy based in civil libertarianism
3 ) welfare reform is an economic liberalism policy based in economic libertarianism
4 ) social welfare is an economic conserative policy based in economic authoritarianism
5 ) etc .

The right refers to the left as liberals because the left is supposedly civil libertarians , in large part because of its proclivities towards abortion and sexual behavior , even though the left often disregards civil liberties such as free association , free speech , gun ownership as a matter of public policy , as a few examples .

The left refers to the right as conservatives because the right is supposedly civil authoritarians , in large part because of its admonition towards abortion and sexual behavior , even though the right often emphasizes economic liberalism ( tax breaks that run up the national debt is authoritarianism ) and gun ownership as a matter of public policy , as a few examples .

The issue which you do not seem to accept is that " classical " liberalism - aka libertarianism - places a great onus of responsibility upon individuals to account for themselves and even allows great latitudes of legitimate aggression as it regards private property and willful intents by contract .

Just because the republican party conjectures to promote economic liberalism does not mean that the libertarian principles are inherently racist , though those who make the choice are allowed to be .

The democratic party conjectures to promote economic conservatism which you apparently embrace in hopes of acquiescing private property for redistribution by means of authoritarianism through the bureaucratic collective , that by libertarian standards is nothing more than theft , even though those who seek to interject that failing to support such measures is based in racial bias .

 

[PoliticalChic]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

And I won't hold it against you as being a paid Political poster either.

Link or lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

LOL. Do you really think doing a cut/paste job is going to scare me? You really are a moron.

I ask you again, "What has the Black-on-Black violence to do with police brutality"?

One is random and the other is a systemic murder by an organized police force who instead of doing their duty to protect & serve are killing Black folks.

Try again, sis. You may need to go back to the trumptard talking-points book to bring back a cogent response. I'll wait.

In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000

Answer the question, dunce.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

And I won't hold it against you as being a paid Political poster either.

Link or lie.

Sure. Here's your bosses link.
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation

 

[PoliticalChic]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

And I won't hold it against you as being a paid Political poster either.

Link or lie.

Sure. Here's your bosses link.
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation

And you actually imagined(I almost said thought) that that was clever???


You're a moron.


How many times a day do perfect strangers tell you that?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

And I won't hold it against you as being a paid Political poster either.

Link or lie.

Sure. Here's your bosses link.
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation

And you actually imagined(I almost said thought) that that was clever???


You're a moron.


How many times a day do perfect strangers tell you that?

Just you and the Party of the Rumpers. That means, low IQs in the party or the Rumpers and a Russian Poster. I can live with that, Comrade.

 

[Magnus]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

LOL. Do you really think doing a cut/paste job is going to scare me? You really are a moron.

I ask you again, "What has the Black-on-Black violence to do with police brutality"?

One is random and the other is a systemic murder by an organized police force who instead of doing their duty to protect & serve are killing Black folks.

Try again, sis. You may need to go back to the trumptard talking-points book to bring back a cogent response. I'll wait.

In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000

Answer the question, dunce.

LOL. Still with the cut/paste of your trumptard talking points?

Add to that, you seem to have reading difficulty. Check back to my first post. I have already said that there are more crimes in poorer areas. And if Brownsville is poorer than Bay Ridge than yes, crime is higher in Brownsville than Bay Ridge.

Get that, moron? Also, next time you post your talking points, include the links so that I can verify it for myself.

Now back to my question that I notice you are avoiding. What is the correlation between Police brutality and Black on Black crime?

I guess your trumptard talking points does not have an answer and so you keep regurgitating the same old cut/paste.

True mark of a trumptard. And, next time learn to read. Will help you look less of a fool,

 

[Daryl Hunt]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

LOL. Do you really think doing a cut/paste job is going to scare me? You really are a moron.

I ask you again, "What has the Black-on-Black violence to do with police brutality"?

One is random and the other is a systemic murder by an organized police force who instead of doing their duty to protect & serve are killing Black folks.

Try again, sis. You may need to go back to the trumptard talking-points book to bring back a cogent response. I'll wait.

In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000

Answer the question, dunce.

LOL. Still with the cut/paste of your trumptard talking points?

Add to that, you seem to have reading difficulty. Check back to my first post. I have already said that there are more crimes in poorer areas. And if Brownsville is poorer than Bay Ridge than yes, crime is higher in Brownsville than Bay Ridge.

Get that, moron? Also, next time you post your talking points, include the links so that I can verify it for myself.

Now back to my question that I notice you are avoiding. What is the correlation between Police brutality and Black on Black crime?

I guess your trumptard talking points does not have an answer and so you keep regurgitating the same old cut/paste.

True mark of a trumptard. And, next time learn to read. Will help you look less of a fool,

English isn't her first language.

 

[my2¢]

It would be a better world if people would be as forgiving of their adversary as they are of those they support.

You are certainly a nice person, per this post.....but it makes no sense to seemingly agree with folks who vote for this:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


See if this cartoon makes my point:

View attachment 362407

It seems you're inferring that Trump has had real success on these issues.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

LOL. Do you really think doing a cut/paste job is going to scare me? You really are a moron.

I ask you again, "What has the Black-on-Black violence to do with police brutality"?

One is random and the other is a systemic murder by an organized police force who instead of doing their duty to protect & serve are killing Black folks.

Try again, sis. You may need to go back to the trumptard talking-points book to bring back a cogent response. I'll wait.

In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000

Answer the question, dunce.

LOL. Still with the cut/paste of your trumptard talking points?

Add to that, you seem to have reading difficulty. Check back to my first post. I have already said that there are more crimes in poorer areas. And if Brownsville is poorer than Bay Ridge than yes, crime is higher in Brownsville than Bay Ridge.

Get that, moron? Also, next time you post your talking points, include the links so that I can verify it for myself.

Now back to my question that I notice you are avoiding. What is the correlation between Police brutality and Black on Black crime?

I guess your trumptard talking points does not have an answer and so you keep regurgitating the same old cut/paste.

True mark of a trumptard. And, next time learn to read. Will help you look less of a fool,

So.....poverty is what causes crime???

Written like a true materialist.



"Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real."
Prager

 

[PoliticalChic]

It would be a better world if people would be as forgiving of their adversary as they are of those they support.

You are certainly a nice person, per this post.....but it makes no sense to seemingly agree with folks who vote for this:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


See if this cartoon makes my point:

View attachment 362407

It seems you're inferring that Trump has had real success on these issues.

Inferring????

I'm simply stating the provable truth.

Any vote for a Democrat, at any level, is a vote for this agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

 

[Andylusion]

You have always had the right to speak your mind. However, you have never had protection from criticism based on what you say.

Yeah, but we were supposed to have protection from people attacking and beating you for it.

 

[Andylusion]

....when an American had the right to speak one's mind, without mobs or rioters attacking that American, when is was even allowed to criticize of mention the color of another individual, without losing one's job or one's head.


When Geraldine Ferraro said, "if Obama was a white man he would not be in this position," the Obama campaign accused her of racism. Ferraro said she was devastated by the attacks that were widely carried by the MSM. This, strangely, happened after Obama said, in the wake of the Rev. Wright debacle, "we need to have a dialogue on race." and after Obamawas quoted in the the Chicago Sun Times as saying, "if I had been one of six new white Senators showing up here in Washington I wouldn't have the book contract or be running for President." ---The Intellectual Republican---


Of course, as time revealed, the unaccomplished ingrate, Hussein Obama, never deserved the honor. Poor Geraldine was pilloried for speaking the truth.


Imagine, when Biden announces a black candidate as his vice-presidential nominee, what would happen in this America, if some brave soul criticized that candidate.


BTW....

On this date, July 12th, 1984
Geraldine Ferraro designated running mate of Walter Mondale
Democratic presidential candidate Walter F. Mondale put forward Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate on this day in 1984, making her the first woman ever nominated for vice president by a major U.S. political party.
Britannica.com
View attachment 362377

Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. It is nothing to do with speaking one's mind or whatever rot you posted.

Second, Geraldine Ferraro may have been criticized but she was hardly penalized in any way. How is this different from any current Republican daring to criticize, even mildly, your tin-pot fuhrer?

Do you want some examples? How about Ted Cruze? Or Carly Fiorina? Your tin-pot fuhrer accused Cruze's father of being the JFK killer and made fun of Fiorina's looks all because they dared run against him in the Republican primary!!!

Another example, Jeff Sessions. He was fired and now he struggles to win back his old seat in Alabama. Reason? He dared to go against his master's word. Talk about losing one's job for speaking one's mind or doing what is right.

And the best part is that all these are fellow Conservatives!

So, not sure what your point for starting this thread. You are either wholly misinformed or totally blind to the shenanigans practiced by your orange fuhrer. Take some time to come up to speed before starting these stupid threads.

"Your post makes no sense. First of all the rioting that is going on right now is due to one too many Black Americans losing their lives due to police brutality. "


Of course it doesn't.

View attachment 362449

Infographic: U.S. Police Shootings: Blacks Disproportionately Affected

Number of people killed in police shootings in the U.S. since January 01, 2015.

www.statista.com

The Democrats promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years



Luckily the Democrats have sheep like you ready to accept every lie they advance.

Gad. Again with the false equivalency. You trumptards really need to up your game or get some new arguments.

What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? Or, are you saying that since majority of Blacks live in poverty or/and/ in violence-prone areas, it is ok for the cops to kill them?

Should Black-on-Black violence stop? Of course. So should White-on-White violence. Asian-on-Asian or any permutations or combinations thereof.

Or, are you saying that no Whites have ever killed or robbed another White person? The same goes for other types of racial violence.

Yes, those crimes have to be stopped but what has that got to do with a Black person being killed in police custody?

I know you racists don't want to hear the truth but when you start an idiotic thread, try to defend your position instead of regurgitating the usual trumptard talking points.

"What does police brutality have to do with random inner-city violence? "


The numbers.


One is simply a rounding error compared to the other.


In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000



I won't hold it against you if you suddenly feel the necessity to run and hide.

LOL. Do you really think doing a cut/paste job is going to scare me? You really are a moron.

I ask you again, "What has the Black-on-Black violence to do with police brutality"?

One is random and the other is a systemic murder by an organized police force who instead of doing their duty to protect & serve are killing Black folks.

Try again, sis. You may need to go back to the trumptard talking-points book to bring back a cogent response. I'll wait.

In a related issue, one which explains the pretended problem that you are willing to accept as true......can you explain the following.
The answer will clarify your confusion about the above.



In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian. As a result, police presence and use of proactive tactics are much higher in Brownsville than in Bay Ridge.

This incidence of crime means that innocent black men have a much higher chance than innocent white men of being stopped by the police because they match the description of a suspect. This is not something the police choose. It is a reality..." The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement



Again?

'In Brownsville, Brooklyn, the per capita shooting rate is 81 times higher than in nearby Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—the first neighborhood predominantly black, the second neighborhood predominantly white and Asian.'


Brownsville population, ......60,000

Bay Ridge population.......70,000

Answer the question, dunce.

LOL. Still with the cut/paste of your trumptard talking points?

Add to that, you seem to have reading difficulty. Check back to my first post. I have already said that there are more crimes in poorer areas. And if Brownsville is poorer than Bay Ridge than yes, crime is higher in Brownsville than Bay Ridge.

Get that, moron? Also, next time you post your talking points, include the links so that I can verify it for myself.

Now back to my question that I notice you are avoiding. What is the correlation between Police brutality and Black on Black crime?

I guess your trumptard talking points does not have an answer and so you keep regurgitating the same old cut/paste.

True mark of a trumptard. And, next time learn to read. Will help you look less of a fool,

There is no direct connection between black and black crime and police brutality.

Partially because police brutality is usually what people call any time police stop a black criminal from doing wrong.

The only connection that exists between the myth of police brutality, and black on black crime, is that when police are accused of brutality, they pull back from crime infested areas, resulting in mass murders and abuse of the public....

which is more black on black crime, since most blacks are both the victims and perpetrators of crime.

So the only indirection connection is, the more you engage in largely false accusations of police brutality, the more blacks end up murdered by blacks.

and this point.... rightly so. You get pretty much what you deserve.