Global warming in action....right before our eyes

[Toddsterpatriot]

LaDexter, snow is not temperature. It's precipitation. Which global warming theory says would increase.

This is science discussion s0n........."theories" don't apply.

And ps......why do you think that in the past 10 years, the public has tuned out global warming? Ummm........its because of stoopid-ass statements that more snow means more warming. Its all about perception s0n..........that's the reality.......and that perception is the alarmists k00ks say shit that is patently absurd!!

That was measured precipitation. Not theory. Of course, one might ask the major Re-insurance companies, like Swess Re, and Munich Re if they have evidence of increased claims because of the increase in major precipitation events.

More buildings, more expensive buildings, must be AGW.........LOL!

 

[RollingThunder]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

If I got grants for it, I'd be part of that consensus, too.

 

[RollingThunder]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

If I got grants for it, I'd be part of that consensus, too.

Based purely of stupidity and a total ignorance about science and how it works, there is denier cult dingbat myth #1 - "Pretty much all of the world's scientists are in a huge conspiracy to fool us rightwingnut retards about human caused global warming and its consequent climate changes."

 

[flacaltenn]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

Your crayon and glitter post fails the basic smell test when media matters writes this ---

Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat.

No reason to read farther than that whopper.. None at all... How do you stand the stench of the stuff you wade around in??

 

[RollingThunder]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

Your crayon and glitter post fails the basic smell test....

Your clueless bullshit fails the basic sanity test, fecalhead.

when media matters writes this ---

Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat.

No reason to read farther than that whopper.. None at all... How do you stand the stench of the stuff you wade around in??

Your ignorance about everything, shit4brains, is not my problem. Your moronic inability to comprehend simple English or follow links to collaborating source materials is likewise, not my problem.

 

[Crick]

Your Media Matters quote is from November of 2012.

I have no idea what you mean by "crayon and glitter post fails the basic smell test". Do you deny that the organizations listed have taken large sums of money from the fossil fuel industry and its 'friends' and that they have done nothing but fight efforts to stop action to curtail AGW? What test do you think this post fails?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

Funny so now post the commercials, billboards and car racing sponsorship



.

 

[Crick]

Funny so now post the commercials, billboards and car racing sponsorship

*

Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

Just visit these websites.

 

[Old Rocks]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

If I got grants for it, I'd be part of that consensus, too.

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

If I got grants for it, I'd be part of that consensus, too.

Then I advise you not to even consider an education in science. Your ethics simply are not adaquete to work in any scientific field.

 

[mamooth]

Mamooth Crick, please explain how CO2 can make ice melt at 12F

Frank, why do you think CO2 can make ice melt at 12F?

You need to work that in with your Grand Unified Theory of Denialism. Intelligent photons, Guam tipping over, floating bowling balls, ice melting at 12F ... I wonder how you'll tie it all together. Everyone eagerly awaits the results of your research.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

If I got grants for it, I'd be part of that consensus, too.

Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'

Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.

What propaganda shit for brains?????? Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....

I guess it is hard to see the obvious when your head is shoved as far up your ass as you keep yours, bareassretard.

Meet The Climate Denial Machine
MediaMatters
JILL FITZSIMMONS
November 28, 2012
(excerpts)
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is "a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening." The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the "controversy" over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a falsebalance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.

Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded "experts" a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.

* Heartland Institute And James Taylor
* Competitive Enterprise Institute
* Chris Horner And The American Tradition Institute
* Manhattan Institute And Robert Bryce
* Heritage Foundation
* Cato Institute And Patrick Michaels
* American Enterprise Institute
* Marc Morano
* Anthony Watts
* Steve Milloy
* Joe Bastardi
* Matt Ridley
* Larry Bell

If I got grants for it, I'd be part of that consensus, too.

Then I advise you not to even consider an education in science. Your ethics simply are not adaquete to work in any scientific field.

Me and 97% of scientists, apparently.

 

[Crick]

Ms Pumpkin Row,

You seem to buy into the contention that an extremely large majority of over 10,000 degreed scientists have all formed a conspiracy to defraud the people of planet Earth. To do so, they have communicated sufficiently to maintain a coherent picture throughout thousands and thousands of peer reviewed studies. They find the same temperatures. They find the same trends. They find the same causes. On hundreds and hundreds of different parameters measured, they are in perfect agreement. They have managed to create a coherent, extremely detailed and fully rational simulacrum of a global process that, you claim, simply does not exist. Amazing work. And through all of that, not a single one of these thousands of scientists, from different nations with different governments, religions, science practices, funding practices... NOT ONE has ever confessed to the conspiracy. NOT ONE has ever slipped up and given it all away. These are some VERY smart and VERY disciplined people Ms Pumpkin Row.

PS: You don't get rich from research grants. Grants pay for the conduct of the research. They are not put in the researcher's pockets. They might help someone keep their job, but so would good work whereas the grand conspiracy would put every one of those thousands of scientists at immediate risk of losing their entire careers and likely facing prosecution.

Yeah... that all makes sense.

Don't take the stupid side in this argument. And the Grand Global Conspiracy is most definitely the stupid side.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

You seem to buy into the contention that an extremely large majority of over 10,000 degreed scientists have all formed a conspiracy to defraud the people of planet Earth. To do so, they have communicated sufficiently to maintain a coherent picture throughout thousands and thousands of peer reviewed studies. They find the same temperatures. They find the same trends. They find the same causes. On hundreds and hundreds of different parameters measured, they are in perfect agreement.

Not entirely true, they've had to correct each other a few different times, and I actually do think that they either communicate or read each others research. Coordinating isn't that hard. Besides, earlier in this thread I already pointed out why, if Global Warming even existed, people have nothing to do with it.

They have managed to create a coherent, extremely detailed and fully rational simulacrum of a global process that, you claim, simply does not exist. Amazing work.

Not so much detailed, no, you guys just trust these scientists with blind faith.

And through all of that, not a single one of these thousands of scientists, from different nations with different governments, religions, science practices, funding practices... NOT ONE has ever confessed to the conspiracy. NOT ONE has ever slipped up and given it all away. These are some VERY smart and VERY disciplined people Ms Pumpkin Row.

You seem to assume that because the news didn't cover it, it hasn't happened. If someone did reveal, not only would it because a whisper, but they'd likely never be able to work in the scientific field again.

PS: You don't get rich from research grants. Grants pay for the conduct of the research. They are not put in the researcher's pockets. They might help someone keep their job, but so would good work whereas the grand conspiracy would put every one of those thousands of scientists at immediate risk of losing their entire careers and likely facing prosecution.

If '97%' is in on it, according to the claims, then I highly doubt there's much for them to worry about, especially with the Establishment covering their backs. Perpetuating this myth is likely easier than actually doing actual science.

Yeah... that all makes sense.

Don't take the stupid side in this argument.

I'm not, if I were, I'd be claiming that Global Warming isn't a myth.

 

[jc456]

Ms Pumpkin Row,

You seem to buy into the contention that an extremely large majority of over 10,000 degreed scientists have all formed a conspiracy to defraud the people of planet Earth. To do so, they have communicated sufficiently to maintain a coherent picture throughout thousands and thousands of peer reviewed studies. They find the same temperatures. They find the same trends. They find the same causes. On hundreds and hundreds of different parameters measured, they are in perfect agreement. They have managed to create a coherent, extremely detailed and fully rational simulacrum of a global process that, you claim, simply does not exist. Amazing work. And through all of that, not a single one of these thousands of scientists, from different nations with different governments, religions, science practices, funding practices... NOT ONE has ever confessed to the conspiracy. NOT ONE has ever slipped up and given it all away. These are some VERY smart and VERY disciplined people Ms Pumpkin Row.

PS: You don't get rich from research grants. Grants pay for the conduct of the research. They are not put in the researcher's pockets. They might help someone keep their job, but so would good work whereas the grand conspiracy would put every one of those thousands of scientists at immediate risk of losing their entire careers and likely facing prosecution.

Yeah... that all makes sense.

Don't take the stupid side in this argument. And the Grand Global Conspiracy is most definitely the stupid side.

Pumpkin stated the 97%, remember, that is 75 out of 77. So you're number of degreed scientists is in error. And the skeptics have over 30,000 degreed that disagree with your 75. ouch. No global warming in anyone's eyes.

 

[RollingThunder]

More 'global warning in action, right before our eyes'....

Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest example of a hotter Earth with bigger fires
U.S. news and World Report
May 10, 2016
By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
(excerpts)
WASHINGTON (AP) Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest of many gargantuan fires on an Earth that's grown hotter with more extreme weather. Earlier this year, large wildfires hit spots on opposite ends of the world Tasmania and Oklahoma-Kansas. Last year, Alaska and California pushed the U.S. to a record 10 million acres burned. Massive fires hit Siberia, Mongolia and China last year and Brazil's fire season has increased by a month over the past three decades. It got so bad that in 2009, Australia added a bright red "catastrophic" to its fire warning index.

"The warmer it is, the more fires we get," said Mike Flannigan, a professor of wildland fire at the University of Alberta. Flannigan said the area burned in Canada has doubled since the 1970s "and we think that's due to climate change." Last week, temperatures pushed past 90 degrees Fahrenheit (mid 30s Celsius) in Alberta, which is unusual for May in northern Canada. "The Alberta wildfires are an excellent example of what we're seeing more and more of: warming means snow melts earlier, soils and vegetation dries out earlier, and the fire season starts earlier. It's a train wreck," University of Arizona climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck wrote in an email.

Worldwide, the length of Earth's fire season increased nearly 19 percent from 1979 to 2013, according to a study by Mark Cochrane, a professor of fire ecology at South Dakota State University. Fires had steadily been increasing, but then in the late 1990s and early 2000s, "we've suddenly been hit with lots of these large fires we can't control," Cochrane said. In terms of acreage burned, the worldwide total may be dropping because of better firefighting, but in North America and Siberia "fires have grown quite a bit due to warming," Columbia University climate and ecology scientist Park Williams wrote in an email. "My estimate is that global warming has been responsible for about half of this increase." The U.S. National Academy of Sciences earlier this year in a study determined that "climate warming has resulted in longer fire seasons." For the entire U.S., the 10-year average number of acres burned in wildfires has more than doubled from about 3 million acres in the mid-1980s to 7 million acres now, according to an analysis of government data by The Associated Press. "Globally we are seeing more fires, bigger fires, more severe fires," said Kevin Ryan, a retired U.S. Forest Service scientist.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

More 'global warning in action, right before our eyes'....

Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest example of a hotter Earth with bigger fires
U.S. news and World Report
May 10, 2016
By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
(excerpts)
WASHINGTON (AP) Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest of many gargantuan fires on an Earth that's grown hotter with more extreme weather. Earlier this year, large wildfires hit spots on opposite ends of the world Tasmania and Oklahoma-Kansas. Last year, Alaska and California pushed the U.S. to a record 10 million acres burned. Massive fires hit Siberia, Mongolia and China last year and Brazil's fire season has increased by a month over the past three decades. It got so bad that in 2009, Australia added a bright red "catastrophic" to its fire warning index.

"The warmer it is, the more fires we get," said Mike Flannigan, a professor of wildland fire at the University of Alberta. Flannigan said the area burned in Canada has doubled since the 1970s "and we think that's due to climate change." Last week, temperatures pushed past 90 degrees Fahrenheit (mid 30s Celsius) in Alberta, which is unusual for May in northern Canada. "The Alberta wildfires are an excellent example of what we're seeing more and more of: warming means snow melts earlier, soils and vegetation dries out earlier, and the fire season starts earlier. It's a train wreck," University of Arizona climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck wrote in an email.

Worldwide, the length of Earth's fire season increased nearly 19 percent from 1979 to 2013, according to a study by Mark Cochrane, a professor of fire ecology at South Dakota State University. Fires had steadily been increasing, but then in the late 1990s and early 2000s, "we've suddenly been hit with lots of these large fires we can't control," Cochrane said. In terms of acreage burned, the worldwide total may be dropping because of better firefighting, but in North America and Siberia "fires have grown quite a bit due to warming," Columbia University climate and ecology scientist Park Williams wrote in an email. "My estimate is that global warming has been responsible for about half of this increase." The U.S. National Academy of Sciences earlier this year in a study determined that "climate warming has resulted in longer fire seasons." For the entire U.S., the 10-year average number of acres burned in wildfires has more than doubled from about 3 million acres in the mid-1980s to 7 million acres now, according to an analysis of government data by The Associated Press. "Globally we are seeing more fires, bigger fires, more severe fires," said Kevin Ryan, a retired U.S. Forest Service scientist.

Flannigan said the area burned in Canada has doubled since the 1970s "and we think that's due to climate change."

That's some serious proof there...........

 

[RollingThunder]

More 'global warning in action, right before our eyes'....

Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest example of a hotter Earth with bigger fires
U.S. news and World Report
May 10, 2016
By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
(excerpts)
WASHINGTON (AP) Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest of many gargantuan fires on an Earth that's grown hotter with more extreme weather. Earlier this year, large wildfires hit spots on opposite ends of the world Tasmania and Oklahoma-Kansas. Last year, Alaska and California pushed the U.S. to a record 10 million acres burned. Massive fires hit Siberia, Mongolia and China last year and Brazil's fire season has increased by a month over the past three decades. It got so bad that in 2009, Australia added a bright red "catastrophic" to its fire warning index.

"The warmer it is, the more fires we get," said Mike Flannigan, a professor of wildland fire at the University of Alberta. Flannigan said the area burned in Canada has doubled since the 1970s "and we think that's due to climate change." Last week, temperatures pushed past 90 degrees Fahrenheit (mid 30s Celsius) in Alberta, which is unusual for May in northern Canada. "The Alberta wildfires are an excellent example of what we're seeing more and more of: warming means snow melts earlier, soils and vegetation dries out earlier, and the fire season starts earlier. It's a train wreck," University of Arizona climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck wrote in an email.

Worldwide, the length of Earth's fire season increased nearly 19 percent from 1979 to 2013, according to a study by Mark Cochrane, a professor of fire ecology at South Dakota State University. Fires had steadily been increasing, but then in the late 1990s and early 2000s, "we've suddenly been hit with lots of these large fires we can't control," Cochrane said. In terms of acreage burned, the worldwide total may be dropping because of better firefighting, but in North America and Siberia "fires have grown quite a bit due to warming," Columbia University climate and ecology scientist Park Williams wrote in an email. "My estimate is that global warming has been responsible for about half of this increase." The U.S. National Academy of Sciences earlier this year in a study determined that "climate warming has resulted in longer fire seasons." For the entire U.S., the 10-year average number of acres burned in wildfires has more than doubled from about 3 million acres in the mid-1980s to 7 million acres now, according to an analysis of government data by The Associated Press. "Globally we are seeing more fires, bigger fires, more severe fires," said Kevin Ryan, a retired U.S. Forest Service scientist.

Flannigan said the area burned in Canada has doubled since the 1970s "and we think that's due to climate change."

That's some serious proof there...........

The entire article contains some serious EVIDENCE, Turdster.....which you are apparently quite blind to, like a good little denier cult dingbat.

Since NOBODY ever claimed that one scientist's opinion somehow constitutes "proof", you can take your really idiotic straw-man argument there and shove it back up your ass (assuming there is room for it, what with your head already taking up so much space in your rectum).

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

More 'global warning in action, right before our eyes'....

Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest example of a hotter Earth with bigger fires
U.S. news and World Report
May 10, 2016
By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
(excerpts)
WASHINGTON (AP) Alberta's unusually early and large fire is just the latest of many gargantuan fires on an Earth that's grown hotter with more extreme weather. Earlier this year, large wildfires hit spots on opposite ends of the world Tasmania and Oklahoma-Kansas. Last year, Alaska and California pushed the U.S. to a record 10 million acres burned. Massive fires hit Siberia, Mongolia and China last year and Brazil's fire season has increased by a month over the past three decades. It got so bad that in 2009, Australia added a bright red "catastrophic" to its fire warning index.

"The warmer it is, the more fires we get," said Mike Flannigan, a professor of wildland fire at the University of Alberta. Flannigan said the area burned in Canada has doubled since the 1970s "and we think that's due to climate change." Last week, temperatures pushed past 90 degrees Fahrenheit (mid 30s Celsius) in Alberta, which is unusual for May in northern Canada. "The Alberta wildfires are an excellent example of what we're seeing more and more of: warming means snow melts earlier, soils and vegetation dries out earlier, and the fire season starts earlier. It's a train wreck," University of Arizona climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck wrote in an email.

Worldwide, the length of Earth's fire season increased nearly 19 percent from 1979 to 2013, according to a study by Mark Cochrane, a professor of fire ecology at South Dakota State University. Fires had steadily been increasing, but then in the late 1990s and early 2000s, "we've suddenly been hit with lots of these large fires we can't control," Cochrane said. In terms of acreage burned, the worldwide total may be dropping because of better firefighting, but in North America and Siberia "fires have grown quite a bit due to warming," Columbia University climate and ecology scientist Park Williams wrote in an email. "My estimate is that global warming has been responsible for about half of this increase." The U.S. National Academy of Sciences earlier this year in a study determined that "climate warming has resulted in longer fire seasons." For the entire U.S., the 10-year average number of acres burned in wildfires has more than doubled from about 3 million acres in the mid-1980s to 7 million acres now, according to an analysis of government data by The Associated Press. "Globally we are seeing more fires, bigger fires, more severe fires," said Kevin Ryan, a retired U.S. Forest Service scientist.

Flannigan said the area burned in Canada has doubled since the 1970s "and we think that's due to climate change."

That's some serious proof there...........

The entire article contains some serious EVIDENCE, Turdster.....which you are apparently quite blind to, like a good little denier cult dingbat.

Since NOBODY ever claimed that one scientist's opinion somehow constitutes "proof", you can take your really idiotic straw-man argument there and shove it back up your ass (assuming there is room for it, what with your head already taking up so much space in your rectum).

I looked at the article and there was zero proof.
You should probably cut your CO2 emissions to zero, just to be safe.

 

[Crick]

There is never proof in the natural sciences. There is evidence. There are predictions. There are routes of falsification. Which make you dubious about AGW?