Global warming in action....right before our eyes

There is never proof in the natural sciences. There is evidence. There are predictions. There are routes of falsification. Which make you dubious about AGW?

There was no evidence that human caused warming is causing more or larger forest fires.

Which make you dubious about AGW?


The people pushing it. The "solutions" they're pushing.
 
IF you think there's no evidence Todd, I can only assume you haven't looked.

sizeofuswildfires.jpg


Forest_fire_increase_AR5.png


8-24-12_wildfiresReport_Figure1_1050_869_s_c1_c_c.jpg


wildfire%20extent.png
 
IF you think there's no evidence Todd, I can only assume you haven't looked.

sizeofuswildfires.jpg


Forest_fire_increase_AR5.png


8-24-12_wildfiresReport_Figure1_1050_869_s_c1_c_c.jpg


wildfire%20extent.png



Total bogusness..........and if people didn't notice, displays from the IPCC which of course is going to pop out alarmist presentations. Too.....anybody who knows how to read a graph ( not most people ) can see clearly that the change is exceedingly tiny compared to the mean........OH BUT THAT RED INCREASE LINE SURE LOOKS DAUNTING:2up:

LOOK.........THE GLOBAL WARMING BOZO'S ALWAYS ARE DISPLAYING GRAPHS AND FIGURES WITH LOTS AND LOTS OF COLOR TO DUPE THE VIEWER. bUT CHECK THE WORLD MAP WITH THE INCREASE IN "FIRE COUNT"......VERY VERY MINIMAL!! fUCKING DUH.........:bye1:

These progressives habitually present stuff in a fraudulent manner to brainwash the dim witted.........whether you are talking the environment, economics, politics...........

Too.........it is all the global warming k00ks who try to link forest fire increase with drought.......zero correlation easily seen via any review of drought maps back to the 1800's.
 
Spectacular Drop In Global Average Satellite Temperatures

tps://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/uah_lt_1979_thru_june_2016_v6-1.jpg?w=1050&h=608[/IMG][/B]


Another alarmist lie bites the dust....

Nope!

Another denier cult dingbat demonstrates his gullible stupidity....

In the real world....

....you are very severely retarded!!!

Particularly if you believe anything coming from that lying, fossil fuel industry sponsored blog that you source a lot of your bullshit from.

Your post = just more denier cult twaddle and spin from the bamboozled Boobster.

In the real world.....

June 2016 Was 2nd Warmest June in Satellite Record: Global Temperature Trend Update
Global climate trend since Nov. 16, 1978: +0.12 C per decade

Reason.com
Ronald Bailey
Jul. 1, 2016
(excerpts)
Although global temperatures fell rapidly from May to June as the El Niño Pacific Ocean warming event fades, June 2016 was nonetheless the second warmest June in the satellite temperature record, according to the press release from the University of Alabama Huntsville. June 2016 trailed June 1998 by 0.23 C, according to Dr. John Christy, director of the Earth System Science Center at UAH. Compared to seasonal norms, however, June 2016 was the 30th warmest month overall since the satellite temperature dataset began in December 1978. June 2016 also was the second warmest on record in the Northern Hemisphere (0.51 C compared to June 1998 at 0.60 C above seasonal norms), but the eighth warmest June in the Southern Hemisphere and, despite the El Niño remnants, only the sixth warmest June in the tropics. The graphic below compares how temperature trends evolved during the big El Nino back in 1997/1998 and the current one that is now fading.

UAH1998v2016.jpg
UAH

Global climate trend since Nov. 16, 1978: +0.12 C per decade.
Global composite temp.: +0.34 C (about 0.61 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.
Northern Hemisphere: +0.51 C (about 0.92 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.
Southern Hemisphere: +0.17 C (about 0.79 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.
Tropics: +.38 C (about 0.68 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.

UAHGraphJune2016.jpg
UAH
 
IF you think there's no evidence Todd, I can only assume you haven't looked.

sizeofuswildfires.jpg


Forest_fire_increase_AR5.png


8-24-12_wildfiresReport_Figure1_1050_869_s_c1_c_c.jpg


wildfire%20extent.png

Thanks for the charts. Which one has the evidence that it's AGW to blame?
OK, Todd. You already know that GHGs do warm the atmosphere. We have increased the CO2, the CH4, NOx, and added industrial gasses for which there are no natural analogs. In the meantime, the TSI has decreased, India and China have put vast amounts of aerosols in the air, more than making up for the decrease in aerosols from the US and Europe. And the temperature continues to increase.

Care to name the cause, and present evidence for that cause?
 
More striking examples of global warming in action are popping up.

This evidence of the reality and dangers of global warming and its consequent climate disruptions and changes will be very fresh in the public's mind when we head into the upcoming Presidential elections in November with Republican Presidential and Congressional candidates insanely denying that anything unusual is happening.

Just over this last weekend....

Over 150 Dead, Millions Evacuated After Catastrophic Flooding Hits China, Pakistan
Published:
Jul 5 2016
By Associated Press
weather.com
(Excerpts)
Catastrophic floods have taken more than 150 lives in China and Pakistan this weekend after days of heavy rain. In China, 128 have been killed and another 42 people have been reported missing according to figures released by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, China.org.cn reports. A mudslide in Guizhou Province killed 23, state media told the BBC. Eight more people died in the city of Wuhan in Hubei Province when a section of a wall collapsed. About 18 inches of rain fell in Macheng, China, in the four days ending 8 a.m. local time on Monday, said weather.com meteorologist Chris Dolce.

The rain collapsed more than 40,000 houses and forced the evacuation of nearly 1.5 million people in 11 regions, mostly along the Yangtze River and its distributaries, China.org.cn reports, and nearly 600,000 people are in urgent need of basic living assistance. The rain has also destroyed more than 700,000 acres of crops, the Xinhua news agency repoorts. Floods and landslides are also affecting telecommunication and electricity facilities, halting or delaying traffic in some regions. The ministry estimated total economic losses of $5.73 billion. Vice Premier Wang Yang warned last month that there was a high possibility of floods in the Yangtze River and Huai River basins this year, which equate to a large swath of China's southern, central and eastern areas.

(MORE: China Tornado Kills 98, Injures 800)

In Pakistan, heavy monsoon rains and flash floods have claimed at least 30 lives and washed away a mosque and several houses in Ursoon, an area of Chitral. Thirteen people are still missing in Chitral, the district’s deputy commissioner Usama Waraich told Gulf News, adding that authorities were evacuating some residents with more rain forecast Monday. The mayor of Chitral district, Maghfirat Shah said the flash flooding hit as people were offering up special Ramadan prayers at the mosque. Dozens of worshippers were swept away in the floodwaters, which destroyed the mosque and damaged several nearby houses and a security post. Afghan authorities also said they had recovered 13 bodies, including eight Pakistani soldiers, which had been swept over the border from Chitral into Afghanistan, Gulf News said.
 
Certainly, "warming" is not the cause of the fires, since there is none

Google

The warmest year on record is 1934 for the US.

Meanwhile, every incremental human life in Cali consumes 20-25 gallons of freshwater every day, stealing such water from rivers, streams, aquifers, lakes, all finite land based water supplies. When humans drain freshwater from nature, nature gets dry....

Solution - desalination of ocean water, leaving nature's water in nature

Problem with solution - Algore's FRAUD is consuming all the enviro funds and lying/misdiagnosing real enviro problems
 
Certainly, "warming" is not the cause of the fires, since there is none
Google
The warmest year on record is 1934 for the US.
Meanwhile, every incremental human life in Cali consumes 20-25 gallons of freshwater every day, stealing such water from rivers, streams, aquifers, lakes, all finite land based water supplies. When humans drain freshwater from nature, nature gets dry....
Solution - desalination of ocean water, leaving nature's water in nature
Problem with solution - Algore's FRAUD is consuming all the enviro funds and lying/misdiagnosing real enviro problems

LaDumbshit's usual clueless off-topic insanity.
 
desalination is "insanity."

CO2 based "climate change" is "real."

LOL!!

The FRAUD loves those fires. They aren't about to correctly diagnose them and fix the problem, because those behind the FRAUD

do not care one bit about the REAL ENVIRONMENT.
 
desalination is "insanity." CO2 based "climate change" is "real." LOL!! The FRAUD loves those fires. They aren't about to correctly diagnose them and fix the problem, because those behind the FRAUD do not care one bit about the REAL ENVIRONMENT.

And LaDumbshit continues to demonstrate how utterly clueless and insane he/she/it actually is.
 
RT - against desal - for FRAUD as long as it enriches DEMOCRATS
 
If you are for funding Algore's FRAUD then you are 100% against desal - against funding it and against using it since your FRAUD doesn't believe it is needed...
 
Since desalination would actually solve a real environmental problem, and "Global Warming" just takes taxdollars and flushes them into the pockets of left wing liars... it is hence "insane" to fix real environmental problems according to RT... since every "problem" is always an "opportunity" for Democrats to make more taxpayer money VANISH...
 
Ms Pumpkin Row,

You seem to buy into the contention that an extremely large majority of over 10,000 degreed scientists have all formed a conspiracy to defraud the people of planet Earth. To do so, they have communicated sufficiently to maintain a coherent picture throughout thousands and thousands of peer reviewed studies. They find the same temperatures. They find the same trends. They find the same causes. On hundreds and hundreds of different parameters measured, they are in perfect agreement. They have managed to create a coherent, extremely detailed and fully rational simulacrum of a global process that, you claim, simply does not exist. Amazing work. And through all of that, not a single one of these thousands of scientists, from different nations with different governments, religions, science practices, funding practices... NOT ONE has ever confessed to the conspiracy. NOT ONE has ever slipped up and given it all away. These are some VERY smart and VERY disciplined people Ms Pumpkin Row.

PS: You don't get rich from research grants. Grants pay for the conduct of the research. They are not put in the researcher's pockets. They might help someone keep their job, but so would good work whereas the grand conspiracy would put every one of those thousands of scientists at immediate risk of losing their entire careers and likely facing prosecution.

Yeah... that all makes sense.

Don't take the stupid side in this argument. And the Grand Global Conspiracy is most definitely the stupid side.



“That is to me the central mystery of climate science. It is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts?" ~ Freeman Dyson
 
Say again?

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica increasing says what about the credibility of the taxpayer funded left wing liars saying "the ice is melting...." ???

LOL!!!

The Leftism religion has a HOLY TEXT, and in that text it says

THOU SHALT ONLY PARROT LEFT WING LIARS, and NEVER THINK OR ASK QUESTIONS OF SUCH LEFT WING LIARS
 
Ms Pumpkin Row,

You seem to buy into the contention that an extremely large majority of over 10,000 degreed scientists have all formed a conspiracy to defraud the people of planet Earth. To do so, they have communicated sufficiently to maintain a coherent picture throughout thousands and thousands of peer reviewed studies. They find the same temperatures. They find the same trends. They find the same causes. On hundreds and hundreds of different parameters measured, they are in perfect agreement. They have managed to create a coherent, extremely detailed and fully rational simulacrum of a global process that, you claim, simply does not exist. Amazing work. And through all of that, not a single one of these thousands of scientists, from different nations with different governments, religions, science practices, funding practices... NOT ONE has ever confessed to the conspiracy. NOT ONE has ever slipped up and given it all away. These are some VERY smart and VERY disciplined people Ms Pumpkin Row.

PS: You don't get rich from research grants. Grants pay for the conduct of the research. They are not put in the researcher's pockets. They might help someone keep their job, but so would good work whereas the grand conspiracy would put every one of those thousands of scientists at immediate risk of losing their entire careers and likely facing prosecution.

Yeah... that all makes sense.

Don't take the stupid side in this argument. And the Grand Global Conspiracy is most definitely the stupid side.



“That is to me the central mystery of climate science. It is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts?" ~ Freeman Dyson

Freeman Dyson's position on AGW is a sad thing. He was once one of the very smartest people on the entire planet. But, as can be seen, no one is immune to the effects of aging.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom