Global warming in action....right before our eyes

I believe in science, of course, but only when there's actual science behind a claim. There's a difference between believing in the scientific method, and believing the scientists claiming to have used it.
If you could demonstrate where the scientists have gone wrong, you wouldn't come across as such a mindless cultist. All you do is repeat your mantras as if they were sacred scripture, because that's what religious cultists do.

I don't trust people, especially ones employed by the government.
Your paranoid nature and your inability to reason is not our problem. It is obviuosly the reason why you were so easily suckered by your cult masters

Sadly for you, things never turn out well for cultists, especially once the cult starts dying, as yours is. To avoid suffering the fate of the Jonestown cultists, you deniers need to start quietly slipping away into the jungle now, before some fellow cultists with guns escort you to the koolaid vat.
I already described it earlier, and everyone ignored it instead of addressing it and trying to prove me wrong. You can look for it yourself, it's near the start of the thread.

It's funny, because calling people 'deniers' is what a cult would do, yet you're making that accusation to everyone that doesn't become government lapdogs.
 
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage

Now that was written in 1981. And had significant mistakes. For most of these effects were expected toward the end of the 21st Century. In 2007, the Northwest Passage opened up for the first time in written history. We are already seeing the start of the breakup of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. And, indeed, the West has seen significant and unusual drought, as has central Asia.

But all of our dumb shits think none of this means anything. And it has nothing at all to do with becoming government lapdogs. With that kind of logic, I can see your future as another person in a red state on welfare costing us in the blue states more tax money to keep you alive.
 
HOLY SMOKING COW --- A 0.5degC change in my lifetime CAUSED 8 to 10 inches of rain??

Well POO -- I'd hate to see what 1 whole fucking degree would do.. I'm scared. Those lakes and rivers must be really really mad there in "west virginy".. I might have to rethink my idiotic and annoying skepticism..


Nitmuck%20Medicine%20Men.JPG


It's a beautiful thing to watch "raw faith" in action --- ain't it?
 
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage

Now that was written in 1981. And had significant mistakes. For most of these effects were expected toward the end of the 21st Century. In 2007, the Northwest Passage opened up for the first time in written history. We are already seeing the start of the breakup of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. And, indeed, the West has seen significant and unusual drought, as has central Asia.

But all of our dumb shits think none of this means anything. And it has nothing at all to do with becoming government lapdogs. With that kind of logic, I can see your future as another person in a red state on welfare costing us in the blue states more tax money to keep you alive.


Hansen can suck my left nut....

A broken clock is more right then he is.


.
 
Meanwhile -- a mini-front just moved thru Nashville and split right around Hillbilly Hollywood. From MY eyes -- it ain't quite warm enough yet. Rain all over the place -- except on my luxury country estate.

Some damn medicine man must have stopped the rain on my parade.
 
Ahhh....another sniveling shit denier cult dingbat, wandering, lost and confused and completely blinded by his crackpot rightwingnut ideologies, in an insane fantasy world of his own creation.

We're apparently heathens, because we don't believe the Liberal's God of 'Science'~
Nope! You are apparently a total retard because you "don't believe" in science as a good and accurate method for understanding the physical universe. You are apparently a clueless twit because you fall for the dumbshit propaganda pumped out by the fossil fuel industry.


What propaganda shit for brains??????


Again where is all this godamn propaganda the past 50 years from the fossil fuel industry aimed at the General public....


.

I still want to know where all this propaganda is by the fossil fuel industry?


I search and. I search and I search,


Zero...

Zip....

Zilch.....


Amoco (Commercial, 1978):
 
Well now, when losing an arguement on logic and evidence, resort to outright stupidity. Works for Trump, after all.


And here we have the propaganda by the AGW cult....

It got so bad, George Carlin made a skit about them.


George Carlin remix - Save the Trees:
 
As a result of human caused global warming, the atmospheric and the oceans (and lakes, rivers and streams) are warmer.....warmer air can hold more water vapor......warmer oceans and other bodies of water tend to evaporate more water faster.....and now, water vapor levels have increased so much, rain and snowstorms can drop much larger quantities of water than before the air warmed and water vapor levels increased.

Although the denier cultists will undoubtedly chant that there have always been heavy rain and floods and massive blizzards, the plain fact is that all of those are becoming more intense and destructive because of the greater amount of water held in the air......which results in this example of global warming driven climate disruptions in action:
"...the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday", according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said.

At least 26 dead as historic floods sweep West Virginia
USA TODAY
Doug Stanglin and Doyle Rice,
June 25, 2016
(excerpts)
The bodies of three more victims of West Virginia's historic flooding were found overnight Saturday, according to county authorities, raising the death toll to 26 from torrential rains and high water that has destroyed more than 100 homes, washed out scores of roads and bridges and knocked out power to tens of thousands of people. On Saturday, President Obama declared a major disaster for West Virginia and ordered federal aid to supplement state and local recovery efforts in the counties of Greenbrier, Kanawha and Nicholas.

...At least 23 others, including an 8-year-old boy who was wading in a foot of water, were killed in the torrential flooding after as much as 8-10 inches of rain fell in six to eight hours in parts of the state on Thursday, according to the National Weather Service. This amount of rain in such a short time is likely a "one-in-a-thousand-year event," the weather service said. The heavy rains and rising water swamped towns, inundated a two-century old resort and trapped 500 people in a shopping center when a bridge was washed out. The storm also knocked out power to 66,000 West Virginians, and forced the shut off of gas in the town of White Sulphur Springs, Tomblin said.


Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin told reporters Friday that damage is widespread and devastating. Saying search and rescue missions are still a top priority, Tomblin issued a state of emergency for 44 counties and deployed 150 members of the National Guard to help emergency responders. The Governer said 60 roads were closed, many of them destroyed, bridges were knocked out, and homes were burned down and washed off foundations. Tens of thousands of people were without power, and several roads were impassable, the Associated Press reported. One dramatic video posted on the WVMetro news website showed a burning house floating down Howard's Creek in White Sulphur Springs.

ClrHenPWYAE_IZt.jpg

FLOOD EMERGENCY: Clendenin,WV can only be accessed by helicopter.
What is the average global rainfall? You infer that the globe is getting wetter, yet there was a thread on global water supplies being down?

BTW, what body of water produced that flood?
 
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage

Now that was written in 1981. And had significant mistakes. For most of these effects were expected toward the end of the 21st Century. In 2007, the Northwest Passage opened up for the first time in written history. We are already seeing the start of the breakup of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. And, indeed, the West has seen significant and unusual drought, as has central Asia.

But all of our dumb shits think none of this means anything. And it has nothing at all to do with becoming government lapdogs. With that kind of logic, I can see your future as another person in a red state on welfare costing us in the blue states more tax money to keep you alive.

Don't forget about these:

3. “More heat waves, no snow in the winter… Climate models… over 20 times more precise than the UN IPCC global models. In no other country do we have more precise calculations of climate consequences. They should form the basis for political planning… Temperatures in the wintertime will rise the most… there will be less cold air coming to Central Europe from the east…In the Alps winters will be 2°C warmer already between 2021 and 2050.”

Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, September 2, 2008.

The big list of failed climate predictions
 
Love the "no snow in winter," because NYC, DC, and Philly all have set ALL TIME RECORD HIGHS for snow since O took office...
 
LaDexter, snow is not temperature. It's precipitation. Which global warming theory says would increase.

So, you were amazingly stupid twice there. Efficient of you, and Frank too, to pack your stupidity and fraud into more concentrated bundles.

Now, let's do what deniers hate most, which is keep talking about actual science.

Increased record-breaking precipitation events under global warming
Increased record-breaking precipitation events under global warming
Lehmann et al (2015)
---
Here, we present the first analysis of record-breaking daily rainfall events using observational data. We show that over the last three decades the number of record-breaking events has significantly increased in the global mean.

rainrec_global.jpg


Record-breaking rainfall events are increasing. That's directly measured evidence showing how the "It's all just random!" people are totally wrong and completely ignorant of the science.

Since that crowd is notably statistics-deficient, I'll help them out. If climate was just fluctuating randomly around a steady baseline, the number of record-breaking events of any type would be decreasing in a sort of exponential decay, being that setting a new record makes setting yet another new record beyond it that much harder. That's true unless the baseline is changing. And the baseline is changing, increasing both for temperature and rainfall, hence why the number of new records there is increasing instead of decreasing.

So, once more, the climate scientists are proven 100% correct. Frank and LaDexter, this is where you run off to eat some more cult shit, and then come back to tell us how yummy it was, and then scream at us because we're not eating shit with you. Please proceed.
 
LaDexter, snow is not temperature. It's precipitation. Which global warming theory says would increase.

This is science discussion s0n........."theories" don't apply.

And ps......why do you think that in the past 10 years, the public has tuned out global warming? Ummm........its because of stoopid-ass statements that more snow means more warming. Its all about perception s0n..........that's the reality.......and that perception is the alarmists k00ks say shit that is patently absurd!!:spinner::spinner:
 
LaDexter, snow is not temperature. It's precipitation. Which global warming theory says would increase.

This is science discussion s0n........."theories" don't apply.

And ps......why do you think that in the past 10 years, the public has tuned out global warming? Ummm........its because of stoopid-ass statements that more snow means more warming. Its all about perception s0n..........that's the reality.......and that perception is the alarmists k00ks say shit that is patently absurd!!:spinner::spinner:
 
LaDexter, snow is not temperature. It's precipitation. Which global warming theory says would increase.

This is science discussion s0n........."theories" don't apply.

And ps......why do you think that in the past 10 years, the public has tuned out global warming? Ummm........its because of stoopid-ass statements that more snow means more warming. Its all about perception s0n..........that's the reality.......and that perception is the alarmists k00ks say shit that is patently absurd!!:spinner::spinner:
That was measured precipitation. Not theory. Of course, one might ask the major Re-insurance companies, like Swess Re, and Munich Re if they have evidence of increased claims because of the increase in major precipitation events.
 

Forum List

Back
Top