Georgia Elections Officials vote to keep vital tool used in ballot harvesting

[Dana7360]

Provide the evidence that this encourages ballot harvesting

Come-on, man! Mail-in voting invites voter fraud, even Jimmy Carter acknowledged this fact!


Aside from that see: Texas Charges Social Worker With 134 Felony Counts Involving Election Fraud

Nov 6, 2020

View attachment 422217
kelly reagan brunner


“Attorney General Ken Paxton today announced that his Election Fraud Unit assisted the Limestone County Sheriff and District Attorney in charging Kelly Reagan Brunner, a social worker in the Mexia State Supported Living Center (SSLC), with 134 felony counts of purportedly acting as an agent and of election fraud,” the state said in a statement. “State Supported Living Centers serve people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Brunner submitted voter registration applications for 67 residents without their signature or effective consent, while purporting to act as their agent.”

Also see: Massive voter fraud uncovered in Harris County, Texas

“They harvest ballots by mail from nursing homes, homeless centers, door to door in poor neighborhoods, often dressed as Census workers. Also, they offer $50 gift cards in front of stores asking people to take ballots by mail, acquired from the above, to sign and mail at a local post office. They hold ballots by mail in several locations where people forge signatures on the collected ballots by mail.”

JWK

Apparently you don't know the difference between a mailbox and a ballot drop off box.

They are two very different things.

I have been putting my ballot in a ballot drop off box for years. I haven't been to a voting or polling place since 1996.

No one in my state has been able to go to a polling place since 2004.

The only thing the US Mail has to do with a ballot put in a ballot drop off box is that the US Mail has delivered the ballot to the voter. The voter then fills out the ballot. Then either puts it back in the mail or at an official ballot drop off box.

Just saying something doesn't make it true.

You have three very huge problems here. You don't know the difference between a mailbox and a ballot drop off box. You also have no proof of your claims. The people who are in charge of voting in Georgia are republicans. They wrote those rules and the extended them. Democrats have no power to do that in Georgia.

Guess what?

What you want and think means NOTHING. You don't matter. What you want and think doesn't matter. You are no one. You don't make any decisions nor do you have any power to force your twisted beliefs on anyone.

Deal with it.

LOSER.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Provide the evidence that this encourages ballot harvesting

Come-on, man! Mail-in voting invites voter fraud, even Jimmy Carter acknowledged this fact!


Aside from that see: Texas Charges Social Worker With 134 Felony Counts Involving Election Fraud

Nov 6, 2020

View attachment 422217
kelly reagan brunner


“Attorney General Ken Paxton today announced that his Election Fraud Unit assisted the Limestone County Sheriff and District Attorney in charging Kelly Reagan Brunner, a social worker in the Mexia State Supported Living Center (SSLC), with 134 felony counts of purportedly acting as an agent and of election fraud,” the state said in a statement. “State Supported Living Centers serve people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Brunner submitted voter registration applications for 67 residents without their signature or effective consent, while purporting to act as their agent.”

Also see: Massive voter fraud uncovered in Harris County, Texas

“They harvest ballots by mail from nursing homes, homeless centers, door to door in poor neighborhoods, often dressed as Census workers. Also, they offer $50 gift cards in front of stores asking people to take ballots by mail, acquired from the above, to sign and mail at a local post office. They hold ballots by mail in several locations where people forge signatures on the collected ballots by mail.”

JWK

There are states that have been using mail-in ballots for years without incident. The military has used it for decades. You'll find your outliers here and there. That's to be expected. Your example is from Texas. A state that Trump won comfortably.
There is no evidence of massive voter fraud with mail-in and drop box ballots.

 

[johnwk]

They are Trump Humpers, the only thing holding them back is the law.

Speaking about the "law", See: Pennsylvania Judge Backs Trump Claims Over Mail-In Ballots, Says 'Unlikely Constitutional'

11/28/2020

"After a Pennsylvania Judge blocked the state from 'taking any further steps' to complete the certification of the presidential race on Wednesday - she dropped a detailed opinion on Friday justifying her decision, which concludes that the state's changes to mail-in balloting procedures were likely illegal.

The order is currently delayed while the state Supreme Court considers the case on an expedited basis, which was filed by a group of Republicans who argued that the state's changes to mail-in voting, Act 77, violated the commonwealth's constitution."

Also see: Memorandum Opinion Filed in Pennsylvania by Judge McCullough – Election Likely Unconstitutional

"The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election. 5

5 The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed various circumstances concerning disenfranchisement of votes. For instance, it has held the right to vote is foundational to our Republic and this fundamental right “can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 555 (1964). Reynolds, which established the “one person, one vote” doctrine, is the seminal case on voter dilution. Under this concept, a mail-in voting process that would exceed the limits of absentee voting prescribed in Pa. Const. Article VII sec 14 could be construed as violating the “one person one vote.” In that event, the sheer magnitude of the number of mail-in ballots would not be a basis to disregard not only this provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution but also the “one person, one vote” doctrine established by Reynolds, one of the bedrock decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court

For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing s/ Patricia A. McCullough PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge

 

[Superbadbrutha]

They are Trump Humpers, the only thing holding them back is the law.

Speaking about the "law", See: Pennsylvania Judge Backs Trump Claims Over Mail-In Ballots, Says 'Unlikely Constitutional'

11/28/2020

"After a Pennsylvania Judge blocked the state from 'taking any further steps' to complete the certification of the presidential race on Wednesday - she dropped a detailed opinion on Friday justifying her decision, which concludes that the state's changes to mail-in balloting procedures were likely illegal.

The order is currently delayed while the state Supreme Court considers the case on an expedited basis, which was filed by a group of Republicans who argued that the state's changes to mail-in voting, Act 77, violated the commonwealth's constitution."

Also see: Memorandum Opinion Filed in Pennsylvania by Judge McCullough – Election Likely Unconstitutional

"The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election. 5

5 The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed various circumstances concerning disenfranchisement of votes. For instance, it has held the right to vote is foundational to our Republic and this fundamental right “can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 555 (1964). Reynolds, which established the “one person, one vote” doctrine, is the seminal case on voter dilution. Under this concept, a mail-in voting process that would exceed the limits of absentee voting prescribed in Pa. Const. Article VII sec 14 could be construed as violating the “one person one vote.” In that event, the sheer magnitude of the number of mail-in ballots would not be a basis to disregard not only this provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution but also the “one person, one vote” doctrine established by Reynolds, one of the bedrock decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court

For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing s/ Patricia A. McCullough PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit

(CNN)A federal judge dealt a death blow to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's win of the presidency on Saturday, by dismissing a closely watched lawsuit that sought to invalidate millions of Pennsylvania votes.
"It is not in the power of this Court to violate the Constitution," Judge Matthew Brann of the US District Court in the Middle District of Pennsylvania wrote on Saturday in a withering decision, hours after the final round of filings in the case came in. The judge wholeheartedly rejected the Trump campaign's attempt to throw out the Pennsylvania vote, noting that Biden has won the state and results will be certified by state officials on Monday. Biden has a margin of more than 81,000 votes in the state.

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote. "At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit - CNNPolitics

 

[johnwk]

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit

That has nothing to do with the
Memorandum Opinion Filed in Pennsylvania by Judge McCullough – Election Likely Unconstitutional

Your 24pt type font does not change squat. Pennsylvania Judge Patricia A. McCullough ruled that the Pennsylvania preliminary ELECTION CERTIFICATION injunction was PROPERLY ISSUED and should be upheld. LNK 11/28/2020

JWK

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit

That has nothing to do with the
Memorandum Opinion Filed in Pennsylvania by Judge McCullough – Election Likely Unconstitutional

Your 24pt type font does not change squat. Pennsylvania Judge Patricia A. McCullough ruled that the Pennsylvania preliminary ELECTION CERTIFICATION injunction was PROPERLY ISSUED and should be upheld. LNK 11/28/2020

JWK

Is the lawsuit thrown out or not?

 

[johnwk]

Is the lawsuit thrown out or not?

So, you now indicate you don't even know what's going on. See:
Pennsylvania Judge Backs GOP Claim in Case Over Mail Voting

"The case is unrelated to one brought by President Donald Trump’s campaign, rejected by a federal appeals court on Friday, that sought to undo Pennsylvania’s certification of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the Keystone State."

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Is the lawsuit thrown out or not?

So, you now indicate you don't even know what's going on. See:
Pennsylvania Judge Backs GOP Claim in Case Over Mail Voting

"The case is unrelated to one brought by President Donald Trump’s campaign, rejected by a federal appeals court on Friday, that sought to undo Pennsylvania’s certification of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the Keystone State."

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.

Really,
Pennsylvania certifies its presidential election results, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner

 

[bottlecap]

.

See: NEW: Georgia Elections Officials Extend Use of Ballot Drop Boxes For January Twin Senate Runoff



“What could possibly go wrong?

Georgia elections officials on Monday voted to extend the use of ballot drop boxes for the January 5 twin Senate runoff where the Republican majority in the Senate is on the line.

The use of ballot drop boxes, which opens the door for illegal ballot harvesting, was set to expire in December, but the 5-member Georgia State Election Board voted to extend the use of drop boxes.

Georgia is already struggling with how to deal with residency concerns after Democrats have called on people to temporarily move to Georgia to vote in the Senate runoff.

GOP incumbent Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler are fighting to keep their seats.”



Let us not forget, during the 2020 presidential election, an activist group Stacey Abrams founded, “Fair Fight Action”, convinced Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, to ignore current voting practices, and to place hundreds of unregulated, unsupervised, ballot drop boxes throughout the State.

This approval last week, to extend the use of ballot drop boxes during the coming Senate runoff election, provides the needed tool used by illegal third parties who harvest ballots, to introduce illegally harvested ballots into the Senate runoff race.

Keep in mind it only takes a few hundred activists to collect hundreds of thousands of harvested ballots from, nursing homes, homeless shelters, food banks, etc., in a short period of time, who then use the drop boxes to introduce these harvested ballots into the system. And this is what Stacey Abrams, and apparently Georgia's Election Officials, have planned for Georgia’s Senate runoff race.

Stacey Abrams has recently boasted that over 750,000 mail in ballots have already been requested.

24-hour accessible mail in ballot drop boxes are located in various locations throughout Georgia, including, parking lots, driveways and walkways, and are an important tool used in ballot harvesting.


View attachment 422140
Fulton County, Georgia, ballot drop box

The fix is already in!

JWK


The unavoidable truth is, our socialist revolutionaries, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, have a plan for “free” college tuition, and cancelling student loan debt. The problem is, it will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.

Which party is in control in the State of Georgia?

Which party is in control of the State of Georgia?? I don't know because GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is obviously doing every thing he an to defeat the Republican candidates.

If Gov. Kemp does not call a Special Session of the State Legislators to stop the Raffensperger steal. then I would say Stacey and the dems are running things.

 

[bottlecap]

.

See: NEW: Georgia Elections Officials Extend Use of Ballot Drop Boxes For January Twin Senate Runoff



“What could possibly go wrong?

Georgia elections officials on Monday voted to extend the use of ballot drop boxes for the January 5 twin Senate runoff where the Republican majority in the Senate is on the line.

The use of ballot drop boxes, which opens the door for illegal ballot harvesting, was set to expire in December, but the 5-member Georgia State Election Board voted to extend the use of drop boxes.

Georgia is already struggling with how to deal with residency concerns after Democrats have called on people to temporarily move to Georgia to vote in the Senate runoff.

GOP incumbent Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler are fighting to keep their seats.”



Let us not forget, during the 2020 presidential election, an activist group Stacey Abrams founded, “Fair Fight Action”, convinced Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, to ignore current voting practices, and to place hundreds of unregulated, unsupervised, ballot drop boxes throughout the State.

This approval last week, to extend the use of ballot drop boxes during the coming Senate runoff election, provides the needed tool used by illegal third parties who harvest ballots, to introduce illegally harvested ballots into the Senate runoff race.

Keep in mind it only takes a few hundred activists to collect hundreds of thousands of harvested ballots from, nursing homes, homeless shelters, food banks, etc., in a short period of time, who then use the drop boxes to introduce these harvested ballots into the system. And this is what Stacey Abrams, and apparently Georgia's Election Officials, have planned for Georgia’s Senate runoff race.

Stacey Abrams has recently boasted that over 750,000 mail in ballots have already been requested.

24-hour accessible mail in ballot drop boxes are located in various locations throughout Georgia, including, parking lots, driveways and walkways, and are an important tool used in ballot harvesting.


View attachment 422140
Fulton County, Georgia, ballot drop box

The fix is already in!

JWK


The unavoidable truth is, our socialist revolutionaries, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, have a plan for “free” college tuition, and cancelling student loan debt. The problem is, it will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.

It is not ballot harvesting. It is providing a convenience to voters. You hate the idea of making it easier to vote.

They’re just as secure if not more secure than a mailbox.

These guys are more and more unhinged.

Here is a problem with drop-boxes. A single person can go to a drop box with say 200 votes, which he collected from a Nursing home. Since the Georgia ballot is Generic, it would be easy to remove votes for one candidate and put in a ballot for a different candidate.

But you are right, as mailboxes present the same problem. Now, if the Georgia ballots had identifiers on them, which were registered by the State of Georgia, when the ballots were mailed out, then it would be a difficult task to alter a vote marked in ink. Not impossible though for vote thieves.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

.

See: NEW: Georgia Elections Officials Extend Use of Ballot Drop Boxes For January Twin Senate Runoff



“What could possibly go wrong?

Georgia elections officials on Monday voted to extend the use of ballot drop boxes for the January 5 twin Senate runoff where the Republican majority in the Senate is on the line.

The use of ballot drop boxes, which opens the door for illegal ballot harvesting, was set to expire in December, but the 5-member Georgia State Election Board voted to extend the use of drop boxes.

Georgia is already struggling with how to deal with residency concerns after Democrats have called on people to temporarily move to Georgia to vote in the Senate runoff.

GOP incumbent Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler are fighting to keep their seats.”



Let us not forget, during the 2020 presidential election, an activist group Stacey Abrams founded, “Fair Fight Action”, convinced Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, to ignore current voting practices, and to place hundreds of unregulated, unsupervised, ballot drop boxes throughout the State.

This approval last week, to extend the use of ballot drop boxes during the coming Senate runoff election, provides the needed tool used by illegal third parties who harvest ballots, to introduce illegally harvested ballots into the Senate runoff race.

Keep in mind it only takes a few hundred activists to collect hundreds of thousands of harvested ballots from, nursing homes, homeless shelters, food banks, etc., in a short period of time, who then use the drop boxes to introduce these harvested ballots into the system. And this is what Stacey Abrams, and apparently Georgia's Election Officials, have planned for Georgia’s Senate runoff race.

Stacey Abrams has recently boasted that over 750,000 mail in ballots have already been requested.

24-hour accessible mail in ballot drop boxes are located in various locations throughout Georgia, including, parking lots, driveways and walkways, and are an important tool used in ballot harvesting.


View attachment 422140
Fulton County, Georgia, ballot drop box

The fix is already in!

JWK


The unavoidable truth is, our socialist revolutionaries, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, have a plan for “free” college tuition, and cancelling student loan debt. The problem is, it will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.

Which party is in control in the State of Georgia?

Which party is in control of the State of Georgia?? I don't know because GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is obviously doing every thing he an to defeat the Republican candidates.

Is that why so many Republicans won in Georgia.

If Gov. Kemp does not call a Special Session of the State Legislators to stop the Raffensperger steal. then I would say Stacey and the dems are running things.

Gov Kemp doesn't need to call anything, there is no voter fraud in Georgia. Alot of Republicans wanted Trump gone and voted for Biden or didn't vote at all, I know that is a hard pill for Trump Humpers to swallow.

 

[bottlecap]

BONEHEAD PLAY or Criminal Voter Fraud??

Drug Manufacturers, CVS, Walgreens Settle Another Opioid Lawsuit with 22 States for $17.3 Billion - The Virginia Star

Thirteen attorneys general announced settlements with opioid manufacturers Teva and Allergan on Friday, while 18 states settled with CVS and Walgreens for a total of $17.3 billion.

thevirginiastar.com

Cobb County BOE Denies Ballot Shredding-After Videos Produce Evidence of Ballot Shredding

The Board of Electors did defend itself saying they only shredded the following:

They say they disposed of:

• Mailing labels (with voter info) that are incorrect or if we’ve printed too many
• Copies of apps printed from OnBase if we are looking for something (the originals are filed in evidence)
• Copies of outdated or changed procedures, policies, forms, notes, or form letters
• Regular and third-party envelopes with voter info on them
• Reports when we are finished doing ‘check off the list’ steps
• Sticky notes and phone messages with voter phone #s or email addresses
• White privacy envelopes after the election is certified
• Printouts of old emails when we have a more current response in the chain
• Duplicates of faxed applications (when voters fax multiples copies of the same app all at the same time)
• There were a tub or two of applications we had copied for the December election and labels that we put in the shredder when the elections were combined and moved to January 5th

=================

WOW Shredding documents during a recount; probably TRUMP votes they needed to dispose of in that list as well.

 

[johnwk]

Really,
Pennsylvania certifies its presidential election results, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner

PA's Supreme Court engaged in Judicial Tyranny, allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots to be counted.

.
.

Unfortunately, PA's Supreme Court dealt a death blow to Judge PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH's, memorandum opinion, in the following COURT ORDER

The PA Supreme Court never addressed the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in ballots which in fact violate Pennsylvania’s Constitution, namely Article VII, §§ 1 and 4


What the Court did was use the doctrine of laches [falsely asserting the dispute was not raised in a timely fashion] questioning unauthorized ballots to be counted, while ignoring their illegality, since the Constitution was never amended to allow such ballots, and, which in effect, cancelled out legally cast ballots, thereby disentrancing millions of Pennsylvania's voters.


In effect, the court assumed legislative and executive functions and engaged in judicial tyranny!

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

 

[Toro]

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Really,
Pennsylvania certifies its presidential election results, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner

PA's Supreme Court engaged in Judicial Tyranny, allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots to be counted.

.
.

Unfortunately, PA's Supreme Court dealt a death blow to Judge PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH's, memorandum opinion, in the following COURT ORDER

The PA Supreme Court never addressed the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in ballots which in fact violate Pennsylvania’s Constitution, namely Article VII, §§ 1 and 4


What the Court did was use the doctrine of laches [falsely asserting the dispute was not raised in a timely fashion] questioning unauthorized ballots to be counted, while ignoring their illegality, since the Constitution was never amended to allow such ballots, and, which in effect, cancelled out legally cast ballots, thereby disentrancing millions of Pennsylvania's voters.


In effect, the court assumed legislative and executive functions and engaged in judicial tyranny!

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Which means frivolous lawsuits were filed with no proof and were thrown out of court.

 

[johnwk]

Really,
Pennsylvania certifies its presidential election results, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner

PA's Supreme Court engaged in Judicial Tyranny, allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots to be counted.

.
.

Unfortunately, PA's Supreme Court dealt a death blow to Judge PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH's, memorandum opinion, in the following COURT ORDER

The PA Supreme Court never addressed the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in ballots which in fact violate Pennsylvania’s Constitution, namely Article VII, §§ 1 and 4


What the Court did was use the doctrine of laches [falsely asserting the dispute was not raised in a timely fashion] questioning unauthorized ballots to be counted, while ignoring their illegality, since the Constitution was never amended to allow such ballots, and, which in effect, cancelled out legally cast ballots, thereby disentrancing millions of Pennsylvania's voters.


In effect, the court assumed legislative and executive functions and engaged in judicial tyranny!

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Which means frivolous lawsuits were filed with no proof and were thrown out of court.

Your assertion without any foundation is noted.


Clause 1 of Article VII of Pennsylvania's Constitution reads:

"Every citizen 21 years of age, possessing the following qualifications, shall be entitled to vote at all elections subject, however, to such laws requiring and regulating the registration of electors as the General Assembly may enact."

In fact Section 14 of Article VII was enacted which is titled:

§ 14. Absentee voting.

(a) The Legislature shall, by general law, provide a manner in which, and the time and place at which, qualified electors who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the municipality of their residence, because their duties, occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their proper polling places because of illness or physical disability or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election day duties, in the case of a county employee, may vote, and for the return and canvass of their votes in the election district in which they respectively reside.


As you can see, Section 14 provides two, and only two ways by which a qualified elector may cast his or her vote in an election:

(1) by submitting his or her vote in propria persona at the polling place on election day; and

(2) by submitting an absentee ballot, but only if the qualified voter satisfies one of the conditions under which absentee voting is authorized as outlined above in "Absentee voting".

No-excuse absentee ballots are not authorized by § 14. "Absentee voting". The Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77 is a legislative attempt to fundamentally change Pennsylvania's voting system, permitting no-excuse mail-in voting, without amending Pennsylvania's Constitution

JWK


Our socialist controlled Democrat Party Leadership has made it possible for voters to not have any skin in the game. They have even removed the effort of having to physically go to the polls to vote by imposing no-excuse mail-in voting.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Kemp's office has responded to the president indicating that, "Georgia law prohibits the governor from interfering in elections. The Secretary of State, who is an elected constitutional officer, has oversight over elections that cannot be overridden by executive order," said Kemp spokesman Cody Hall to the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Really,
Pennsylvania certifies its presidential election results, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner

PA's Supreme Court engaged in Judicial Tyranny, allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots to be counted.

.
.

Unfortunately, PA's Supreme Court dealt a death blow to Judge PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH's, memorandum opinion, in the following COURT ORDER

The PA Supreme Court never addressed the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in ballots which in fact violate Pennsylvania’s Constitution, namely Article VII, §§ 1 and 4


What the Court did was use the doctrine of laches [falsely asserting the dispute was not raised in a timely fashion] questioning unauthorized ballots to be counted, while ignoring their illegality, since the Constitution was never amended to allow such ballots, and, which in effect, cancelled out legally cast ballots, thereby disentrancing millions of Pennsylvania's voters.


In effect, the court assumed legislative and executive functions and engaged in judicial tyranny!

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Which means frivolous lawsuits were filed with no proof and were thrown out of court.

Your assertion without any foundation is noted.


Clause 1 of Article VII of Pennsylvania's Constitution reads:

"Every citizen 21 years of age, possessing the following qualifications, shall be entitled to vote at all elections subject, however, to such laws requiring and regulating the registration of electors as the General Assembly may enact."

In fact Section 14 of Article VII was enacted which is titled:

§ 14. Absentee voting.

(a) The Legislature shall, by general law, provide a manner in which, and the time and place at which, qualified electors who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the municipality of their residence, because their duties, occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their proper polling places because of illness or physical disability or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election day duties, in the case of a county employee, may vote, and for the return and canvass of their votes in the election district in which they respectively reside.


As you can see, Section 14 provides two, and only two ways by which a qualified elector may cast his or her vote in an election:

(1) by submitting his or her vote in propria persona at the polling place on election day; and

(2) by submitting an absentee ballot, but only if the qualified voter satisfies one of the conditions under which absentee voting is authorized as outlined above in "Absentee voting".

No-excuse absentee ballots are not authorized by § 14. "Absentee voting". The Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77 is a legislative attempt to fundamentally change Pennsylvania's voting system, permitting no-excuse mail-in voting, without amending Pennsylvania's Constitution

JWK


Our socialist controlled Democrat Party Leadership has made it possible for voters to not have any skin in the game. They have even removed the effort of having to physically go to the polls to vote by imposing no-excuse mail-in voting.

Give it up, you took a shot and lost. The election is over, learn to start saying President Joe Biden.

 

[johnwk]

Really,
Pennsylvania certifies its presidential election results, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner

PA's Supreme Court engaged in Judicial Tyranny, allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots to be counted.

.
.

Unfortunately, PA's Supreme Court dealt a death blow to Judge PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH's, memorandum opinion, in the following COURT ORDER

The PA Supreme Court never addressed the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in ballots which in fact violate Pennsylvania’s Constitution, namely Article VII, §§ 1 and 4


What the Court did was use the doctrine of laches [falsely asserting the dispute was not raised in a timely fashion] questioning unauthorized ballots to be counted, while ignoring their illegality, since the Constitution was never amended to allow such ballots, and, which in effect, cancelled out legally cast ballots, thereby disentrancing millions of Pennsylvania's voters.


In effect, the court assumed legislative and executive functions and engaged in judicial tyranny!

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Which means frivolous lawsuits were filed with no proof and were thrown out of court.

Your assertion without any foundation is noted.


Clause 1 of Article VII of Pennsylvania's Constitution reads:

"Every citizen 21 years of age, possessing the following qualifications, shall be entitled to vote at all elections subject, however, to such laws requiring and regulating the registration of electors as the General Assembly may enact."

In fact Section 14 of Article VII was enacted which is titled:

§ 14. Absentee voting.

(a) The Legislature shall, by general law, provide a manner in which, and the time and place at which, qualified electors who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the municipality of their residence, because their duties, occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their proper polling places because of illness or physical disability or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election day duties, in the case of a county employee, may vote, and for the return and canvass of their votes in the election district in which they respectively reside.


As you can see, Section 14 provides two, and only two ways by which a qualified elector may cast his or her vote in an election:

(1) by submitting his or her vote in propria persona at the polling place on election day; and

(2) by submitting an absentee ballot, but only if the qualified voter satisfies one of the conditions under which absentee voting is authorized as outlined above in "Absentee voting".

No-excuse absentee ballots are not authorized by § 14. "Absentee voting". The Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77 is a legislative attempt to fundamentally change Pennsylvania's voting system, permitting no-excuse mail-in voting, without amending Pennsylvania's Constitution

JWK


Our socialist controlled Democrat Party Leadership has made it possible for voters to not have any skin in the game. They have even removed the effort of having to physically go to the polls to vote by imposing no-excuse mail-in voting.

Give it up, you took a shot and lost. The election is over, learn to start saying President Joe Biden.

So, once again you offer nothing to substantiate the claim that no-excuse mail-in ballots used in Pennsylvania are lawful.



The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Really,
Pennsylvania certifies its presidential election results, officially declaring Joe Biden the winner

PA's Supreme Court engaged in Judicial Tyranny, allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots to be counted.

.
.

Unfortunately, PA's Supreme Court dealt a death blow to Judge PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH's, memorandum opinion, in the following COURT ORDER

The PA Supreme Court never addressed the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in ballots which in fact violate Pennsylvania’s Constitution, namely Article VII, §§ 1 and 4


What the Court did was use the doctrine of laches [falsely asserting the dispute was not raised in a timely fashion] questioning unauthorized ballots to be counted, while ignoring their illegality, since the Constitution was never amended to allow such ballots, and, which in effect, cancelled out legally cast ballots, thereby disentrancing millions of Pennsylvania's voters.


In effect, the court assumed legislative and executive functions and engaged in judicial tyranny!

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Which means frivolous lawsuits were filed with no proof and were thrown out of court.

Your assertion without any foundation is noted.


Clause 1 of Article VII of Pennsylvania's Constitution reads:

"Every citizen 21 years of age, possessing the following qualifications, shall be entitled to vote at all elections subject, however, to such laws requiring and regulating the registration of electors as the General Assembly may enact."

In fact Section 14 of Article VII was enacted which is titled:

§ 14. Absentee voting.

(a) The Legislature shall, by general law, provide a manner in which, and the time and place at which, qualified electors who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the municipality of their residence, because their duties, occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their proper polling places because of illness or physical disability or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election day duties, in the case of a county employee, may vote, and for the return and canvass of their votes in the election district in which they respectively reside.


As you can see, Section 14 provides two, and only two ways by which a qualified elector may cast his or her vote in an election:

(1) by submitting his or her vote in propria persona at the polling place on election day; and

(2) by submitting an absentee ballot, but only if the qualified voter satisfies one of the conditions under which absentee voting is authorized as outlined above in "Absentee voting".

No-excuse absentee ballots are not authorized by § 14. "Absentee voting". The Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77 is a legislative attempt to fundamentally change Pennsylvania's voting system, permitting no-excuse mail-in voting, without amending Pennsylvania's Constitution

JWK


Our socialist controlled Democrat Party Leadership has made it possible for voters to not have any skin in the game. They have even removed the effort of having to physically go to the polls to vote by imposing no-excuse mail-in voting.

Give it up, you took a shot and lost. The election is over, learn to start saying President Joe Biden.

So, once again you offer nothing to substantiate the claim that no-excuse mail-in ballots used in Pennsylvania are lawful.



The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

You provide the evidence that will hold up in a Court of Law.