Fulton County: ‘We Don’t Dispute’ 315,000 Votes Lacking Poll Workers’ Signatures Were Counted In 2020

[WorldWatcher]

Like Biden, Bush, Obama, Clinton did?

Garages, bathrooms, sock drawers

Biden, Bush, Obama, and Clinton didn't refuse to return Classified Documents when ordered to do so by US Government Officials after leaving office.

Trump, nor Pence or Biden where charged with having documents. Only Trump was charged under the Espionage Act (18 USC 793e) for failure to return the document when directed because - wait for it - they voluntarily returned the documents when found.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Are you saying Biden shouldn't have kept all those documents?

Of course he shouldn't.

But neither he, Pence, or Trump were charged with having the documents. Trump was the only one that refused to return them and attempted to obstruct justice to hide them.

WW

 

[Failzero]

Of course he shouldn't.

But neither he, Pence, or Trump were charged with having the documents. Trump was the only one that refused to return them and attempted to obstruct justice to hide them.

WW

Because he was the only one legally able to have them …

 

[WorldWatcher]

Because he was the only one legally able to have them …

RE: Classified Documents.

Not after he left office and was no longer President.

WW

 

[struth]

Biden, Bush, Obama, and Clinton didn't refuse to return Classified Documents when ordered to do so by US Government Officials after leaving office.

Trump, nor Pence or Biden where charged with having documents. Only Trump was charged under the Espionage Act (18 USC 793e) for failure to return the document when directed because - wait for it - they voluntarily returned the documents when found.

WW

Clinton and xiden certainly did

 

[WorldWatcher]

Clinton and xiden certainly did

Pence and Biden did turn over the documents they found voluntarily, they did not refuse to return them nor did they obstruct justice in attempting to hide them.

It's funny you leave Pence out (the GOP VP).

Trump was not charged (same as Clinton, Pence, and Biden) with "having" the documents, after he left office and was a civilian, he was charged with failing to return them once ordered to do so by United States Government Officers (National Archivist, FBI, Federal Subpeona).

WW

 

[struth]

Pence and Biden did turn over the documents they found voluntarily, they did not refuse to return them nor did they obstruct justice in attempting to hide them.

It's funny you leave Pence out (the GOP VP).

Trump was not charged (same as Clinton, Pence, and Biden) with "having" the documents, after he left office and was a civilian, he was charged with failing to return them once ordered to do so by United States Government Officers (National Archivist, FBI, Federal Subpeona).

WW

Pence did

Xiden was hiding documents he stole from the time he was a US senator. Stuffing back 30 years

He only turned them over after one of his lawyers found them and ratted him out

 

[WorldWatcher]

Pence did

Xiden was hiding documents he stole from the time he was a US senator. Stuffing back 30 years

He only turned them over after one of his lawyers found them and ratted him out

Yes, his lawyers were closing out his U. Penn office and found the documents. They contacted the National Archivist for transfer which led to expanded searches including voluntary searches of his home by the FBI. The expanded searches located some more documents in his home.

During the whole thing Pence and Biden cooperated with authorities to locate and return the classified documents.

Which is not what Trump did, he refused to return documents and activiely obstructed justice be attempting to evade a federal subpeona.

That's why Pence and Biden werer not charged and Trump was charged. None were charged with "having" the documents, Trump was charged with refusing to return them.

WW

 

[struth]

Yes, his lawyers were closing out his U. Penn office and found the documents. They contacted the National Archivist for transfer which led to expanded searches including voluntary searches of his home by the FBI. The expanded searches located some more documents in his home.

During the whole thing Pence and Biden cooperated with authorities to locate and return the classified documents.

Which is not what Trump did, he refused to return documents and activiely obstructed justice be attempting to evade a federal subpeona.

That's why Pence and Biden werer not charged and Trump was charged. None were charged with "having" the documents, Trump was charged with refusing to return them.

WW

Cool, trump was actively working with the NA as well

The differed is unlike xiden he had hide and been stealing classified documents for decades

Moreover trump didn’t sell classified material like xiden did

 

[WorldWatcher]

Cool, trump was actively working with the NA as well

No he wasn't. He was stonewalling and actively hid the documents FROM HIS OWN LAWYERS to evade the subpoena.

The differed is unlike xiden he had hide and been stealing classified documents for decades

Neither Biden or Trump were charged with having the documents.

Moreover trump didn’t sell classified material like xiden did

Fantasy, there is no evidence that Biden sold any classified information.

But there is audio of Trump discussing and showing off classified documents with a reporter after he was out of office. Which of course he later tried to deny, but the him on recording is very clear.

WW
.
.
.

 

[struth]

No he wasn't. He was stonewalling and actively hid the documents FROM HIS OWN LAWYERS to evade the subpoena.



Neither Biden or Trump were charged with having the documents.



Fantasy, there is no evidence that Biden sold any classified information.

But there is audio of Trump discussing and showing off classified documents with a reporter after he was out of office.

WW
.
.
.

1) factually incorrect. Trump was actively working with the NA they were at his homec he had returned dozens of boxes. There was dispute over some they were working on
2) xiden wasn’t cause he was too senile to prosecute. Trump was charged but won in court
3) read the Hur report https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

He shared classified intel with a ghost writer for a $200k advance

You really aren’t up to date on the facts here

 

[WorldWatcher]

1) factually incorrect. Trump was actively working with the NA they were at his homec he had returned dozens of boxes. There was dispute over some they were working on
2) xiden wasn’t cause he was too senile to prosecute. Trump was charged but won in court
3) read the Hur report https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

He shared classified intel with a ghost writer for a $200k advance

You really aren’t up to date on the facts here

LOL

Trump didn't "win" in court. His radical Judge ignored the clear language of the United States Code by Congress clearly authorizing the Attorney General the power to appoint prosecutors and ignored 150 years of every court in the country (including the Supreme Court) that the AG had the power to appoint special prosecutors.

The Judge delayed, delayed, delayed. Even issuing at least two orders that had to be appealed on an interlocutory basis in that very case. Both time she got overturned and slammed by the appeals court. The appeals court was not happy with her performance and her dismissal would have been overturned and the case returned for trial.

However Trump achieved his goal for running for reelection not to be President, but to stay out of prison. With his election the prosecution was forced to drop the case while Trump was in office.

You should stop trying to rewrite history.

You can catch up on what happened in the case at the link below.

WW

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/united-states-v-trump/

 

[struth]

LOL

Trump didn't "win" in court. His radical Judge ignored the clear language of the United States Code by Congress clearly authorizing the Attorney General the power to appoint prosecutors and ignored 150 years of every court in the country (including the Supreme Court) that the AG had the power to appoint special prosecutors.

The Judge delayed, delayed, delayed. Even issuing at least two orders that had to be appealed on an interlocutory basis in that very case. Both time she got overturned and slammed by the appeals court. The appeals court was not happy with her performance and her dismissal would have been overturned and the case returned for trial.

However Trump achieved his goal for running for reelection not to be President, but to stay out of prison. With his election the prosecution was forced to drop the case while Trump was in office.

You should stop trying to rewrite history.

You can catch up on what happened in the case at the link below.

WW

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/united-states-v-trump/

Of course he won’t in court, the charges were dismissed…a minute ago you said he wasn’t charged…now you are attacking the judicial system?? Hahab

 

[WorldWatcher]

Of course he won’t in court, the charges were dismissed…a minute ago you said he wasn’t charged…now you are attacking the judicial system?? Hahab

You seem confused.

He didn't win on the merits, he got his radical Judge to dismiss the charges not on the merits but on the made up disqualification of the Special Prosecutor contrary to 150 years of precedent on the matter. A decision that ran out the clock until after the election but would have been reversed on appeal.

I said Trump wasn't charged with "having" the documents, he was charge with failing to return them as required under the Espionage Act (18 USC 793e) when, as a civilian, he was ordered to do so by Officers of the United States Government (National Archivist, FBI, and Federal Subpoena).

W

 

[struth]

You seem confused.

He didn't win on the merits, he got his radical Judge to dismiss the charges not on the merits but on the made up disqualification of the Special Prosecutor contrary to 150 years of precedent on the matter. A decision that ran out the clock until after the election but would have been reversed on appeal.

I said Trump wasn't charged with "having" the documents, he was charge with failing to return them as required under the Espionage Act (18 USC 793e) when, as a civilian, he was ordered to do so by Officers of the United States Government (National Archivist, FBI, and Federal Subpoena).

W

Of course the won in the merris

The charges were meritless and couldn’t even make it to trial

 

[midcan5]

Another biased site to keep the easy lead looking in the wrong direction - will they ever learn they are being played.

https://www.quora.com/Is-The-Federalist-a-good-news-source

 

[WorldWatcher]

Of course the won in the merris

The charges were meritless and couldn’t even make it to trial

No he didn't.

The case was dismissed by a radical Judge and that dismissal would have been overturned on appeal. But she allowed him to run out the clock.

The charges were fully merited and he knew if it went to trial that he would have been convicted of espionage and obstruction. Scared the living hell out of him.

WW

 

[struth]

No he didn't.

The case was dismissed by a radical Judge and that dismissal would have been overturned on appeal. But she allowed him to run out the clock.

The charges were fully merited and he knew if it went to trial that he would have been convicted of espionage and obstruction. Scared the living hell out of him.

WW

Hahha

If it could been overturned it would have been.

Trump knew the case couldn’t go to trial because his lawyers knew the law and the courts agreed

The demafacist never intend the case to go to trial, they only brought it after he announced he was running. The entire point was politics

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Of course he shouldn't.

But neither he, Pence, or Trump were charged with having the documents. Trump was the only one that refused to return them and attempted to obstruct justice to hide them.

WW

Biden didn't refuse to return them?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Biden didn't refuse to return them?

Why did you leave Pence out of the question?

WW