Georgia County Orders Elderly Black Voters Off Bus Taking Them To The Polls

[Correll]

It is unlawful to use COUNTY FUNDED FACILITIES TO FACILITATE OBVIOUSLY PARTISAN POLITICAL PANDERING. (Actually, it doesn't even have to be all that obvious...just probable)

So simple a 5 year old could understand it. Why is it Progs here can't?

Can these Leftist fruitcakes even understand English?

There is nothing partisan about black people voting

What is partisan is suppressing the vote

That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.


You are just a lying troll.

This might be the dumbest post you have ever made.

I am a little embarrassed for you actually.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

You used the Logical Fallacy of Argument by Ridicule,


because you could NOT refute anything I said, but wanted to. So you tried to hide it, with assholeness.



It did not work.


My point stands.


That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.

Explain how a vote can be "partisan"?

THe actual discussion above was " black people voting" vs "suppressing the vote", not that this particular incident is really voter suppression.



If the group is "partisan" ie heavily biased to one side, then both actions would be partisan.


If the group in question is NOT, then neither would.


Rightwinger, as always, is trying to have it both ways.

 

[Correll]

“We knew it was an intimidation tactic,” Black Voters Matter co-founder LaTosha Brown said.

Dozens of black senior citizens in rural Georgia were ordered off a bus bound for the polls after county officials said the event constituted prohibited “political activity.”

A Jefferson County clerk reportedly told staff members from the Leisure Center in Louisville on Monday ― the first day of in-person early voting in Georgia ― that roughly 40 black people couldn’t take part in the trip after receiving a complaint from an unnamed caller.

The trip had been organized by the nonpartisan Black Voters Matter, which is embarking on a bus tour across several southern states with the goal of urging black people to vote. The caller said the bus, which was painted with the words “The South is Rising Tour,” should not be allowed to bring people to the polls, reported The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Georgia County Orders Elderly Black Voters Off Bus Taking Them To The Polls

Evil. Really evil to discourage dozens of black senior citizens from voting. Evil.

Shitstain.....you are a liar......here....the important part you left out...democrats, cheating again....breaking the rules...again...

Georgia County Orders Elderly Black Voters Off Bus Taking Them To The Polls | HuffPost

Jefferson County Administrator Adam Brett said the trip, set to depart from a county-run senior center, was political and therefore violated guidelines imposed on county-sponsored events, the AJC reported.

Although Black Voters Matter is a nonpartisan organization, Jefferson County Democratic Party Chairwoman Diane Evans helped organize the event.

Officials “felt uncomfortable with allowing senior center patrons to leave the facility in a bus with an unknown third party,” Brett told the AJC. “No seniors at the Jefferson County senior center were denied their right to vote.”

The Democratic arty working hand in hand with the non-partisan group, BLack Votes Matter?


curiouser and curiouser.



View attachment 223233

So what?

Are you asserting these voters were somehow invalid?

YOu are asking if I asserted something? Do you see me asserting that?


If you do see that, then seek medical attention.

 

[Correll]

It is unlawful to use COUNTY FUNDED FACILITIES TO FACILITATE OBVIOUSLY PARTISAN POLITICAL PANDERING. (Actually, it doesn't even have to be all that obvious...just probable)

So simple a 5 year old could understand it. Why is it Progs here can't?

Can these Leftist fruitcakes even understand English?

There is nothing partisan about black people voting

What is partisan is suppressing the vote

That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.


You are just a lying troll.

WTF are you babbling about Klan Boy?

Black people voting is not partisan.......blocking their vote is

You can't just ignore the meanings of words.


Definition of PARTISAN


Definition of partisan (Entry 2 of 3)

"1: feeling, showing, or deriving from strong and sometimes blind adherence to a particular party, faction, cause, or person : exhibiting, characterized by, or resulting from partisanship"


It is completely possible for the act of getting a certain group of voters to the polls, to be partisan, if you are doing it out of partisan motives.


Wait, what am I saying?


i forgot how completely dishonest you are.


Of course YOU can say it. But the response should be laughter at your obvious lie. And you.

So, based upon this definition of partisan, is there any vote that is not partisan?

That's the definition of partisan. Don't act like it is not.


And sure. Obviously. Just insert the word "not" at the beginning of the definition and you have how a vote, or a group of votes would be "not" partisan.


It is very odd that you have to have this explained to you.

 

[Correll]

As usual, you left out key information that qualifies your bombastic thread title. Folks, go read the Atlanta Journal-Constitution article to get the full story. The OP is misleading.

You are being too kind the OP is lying. No one was denied his/her right to vote.

Rachel Maddow just finished a segment on this story. Republicans are evil. Voter suppression is evil.

Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

So what?

Err, what so what? YOu didn't answer the question, so...what are you talking about?


Are you assuming the answer, that we both know, and just not stating it?


Sorry, that can't work. TOo many lefties have done shit like that, then walked it back when I crushed them.


You have to say it clearly.



Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Well if you look a little further you might find out that the Org is a Super Pak of Dark Money from the 501 527 bunch who are hardly nonpartisan. Someone call it round up the slaves, which I found racist but found out it was a Blk guy I knew from work. He said that why he was voting his way not their way. Well what ever turn ya on. Bros can be axxholes when they want.View attachment 223245

It makes no difference who paid for their transportation, dope.

Those folks were denied their right to vote.

Sure it does. It is further evidence that the claim of being non partisan is utter shit.

 

[Correll]

Sure, I have no problem with churches getting involved in partisan politics. Do you?

Duh, yes I do - until they lose their tax-exempt status.

Liar. If that was a black church bus, you would have no problem with it.

Really? I don't ever remember complaining about any church bus taking voters to the polls.

White voters can generally get their own asses to the polls. They don't need a church bus. But if they did, and you heard about it, you would complain, and you know it.

So quit fucking whining and raise some funds to take old white Republicans to vote, loser.

There's nothing stopping you from doing the same thing.

Calling libs out of their bullshit is not whining.


It is a public service.

 

[Correll]

Whites don't vote in a block. They are the MOST evenly divided racial or ethnic group that I have ever heard of.


A White Votes Matters could actually be a non-partisan group.

What a racist

Don't pretend you are too stupid to know that.


Blacks vote 90-95 per cent one way.


Whites vote less than 60 per cent one way.


YOu are just being a Troll and a race baiting asshole.

Is that why you did not want them being bused to the voting location?

I don't really have an opinion on that. I am just calling out libs on their bullshit and corruption.

Transporting people to the polls is not corruption, dope.

If the dems are using county funds and/or equipment to do it, it is, stupid.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

There is nothing partisan about black people voting

What is partisan is suppressing the vote

That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.


You are just a lying troll.

This might be the dumbest post you have ever made.

I am a little embarrassed for you actually.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

You used the Logical Fallacy of Argument by Ridicule,


because you could NOT refute anything I said, but wanted to. So you tried to hide it, with assholeness.



It did not work.


My point stands.


That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.

Explain how a vote can be "partisan"?

THe actual discussion above was " black people voting" vs "suppressing the vote", not that this particular incident is really voter suppression.



If the group is "partisan" ie heavily biased to one side, then both actions would be partisan.


If the group in question is NOT, then neither would.


Rightwinger, as always, is trying to have it both ways.

Does that somehow justify the actions of the county in stopping them from voting, at least temporarily?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

There is nothing partisan about black people voting

What is partisan is suppressing the vote

That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.


You are just a lying troll.

WTF are you babbling about Klan Boy?

Black people voting is not partisan.......blocking their vote is

You can't just ignore the meanings of words.


Definition of PARTISAN


Definition of partisan (Entry 2 of 3)

"1: feeling, showing, or deriving from strong and sometimes blind adherence to a particular party, faction, cause, or person : exhibiting, characterized by, or resulting from partisanship"


It is completely possible for the act of getting a certain group of voters to the polls, to be partisan, if you are doing it out of partisan motives.


Wait, what am I saying?


i forgot how completely dishonest you are.


Of course YOU can say it. But the response should be laughter at your obvious lie. And you.

So, based upon this definition of partisan, is there any vote that is not partisan?

That's the definition of partisan. Don't act like it is not.


And sure. Obviously. Just insert the word "not" at the beginning of the definition and you have how a vote, or a group of votes would be "not" partisan.


It is very odd that you have to have this explained to you.

So, one more time...is voting a partisan act in and of itself?

 

[Correll]

Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Why would it be partisan?
You don’t think blacks vote independently?

Why are you too much of a pussy to answer a simple question?


Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

The better question is:
Do you believe that blocking registered voters from voting is voter supression?

Voters have a right to vote. How they arrive at their polling place is irrelevant.

Using government funds, to get the voters there, using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.


Not to mention the always important factor of calling out libs on their bullshit.

What "govt funds"?
Can you show us that no republican voters were permitted on the bus?

1. It's a government facility. The residents would have to be gotten ready for the trip, not a minor issue. That's paid government employees and equipment being used. And I want to know who paid for that bus.


2. A group of voters does not have to be 100% biased to be biased, and thus partisan.

 

[Correll]

Using government funds, to get the voters there,

Why is this a bad thing, not that it seems that it happened.

using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.

So, what you are saying is that if someone is being driven to the polling place by a partisan they do not deserve to vote?

No doubt. I think mass transit should be free when voting.

If it is free across the board, instea

Using government funds, to get the voters there,

Why is this a bad thing, not that it seems that it happened.

using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.

So, what you are saying is that if someone is being driven to the polling place by a partisan they do not deserve to vote?

No doubt. I think mass transit should be free when voting.

I think there should be a national election day -- held on a weekend -- to insure we get as much voter participation as possible ----- but then again, I am not a conservative, so the thought of more people voting doesn't frighten me like it does conservatives...no matter what lip service they pay to that idea..

No, you are a liberal, a member of an ideological movement that discourages self reliance and motivation.


So, naturally you know that your voters are more likely to be too lazy to get themselves to the polls, so you want to make it as easy as possible for those too lazy to educate themselves on the issues to vote anyways.

 

[Correll]

Liar. If that was a black church bus, you would have no problem with it.

Really? I don't ever remember complaining about any church bus taking voters to the polls.

White voters can generally get their own asses to the polls. They don't need a church bus. But if they did, and you heard about it, you would complain, and you know it.

So quit fucking whining and raise some funds to take old white Republicans to vote, loser.

There's nothing stopping you from doing the same thing.

You mean besides the media claiming he is creating a klan rally and subsequently getting him fired for his job?

When have you folks cared about what the media does??

And no one would claim it was a klan rally unless the klan declared it a rally....but that is a personal problem if that is your fear....

Liar. You libs smear people falsely all the time. And you know it.

 

[Correll]

Really? I don't ever remember complaining about any church bus taking voters to the polls.

White voters can generally get their own asses to the polls. They don't need a church bus. But if they did, and you heard about it, you would complain, and you know it.

So quit fucking whining and raise some funds to take old white Republicans to vote, loser.

There's nothing stopping you from doing the same thing.

You mean besides the media claiming he is creating a klan rally and subsequently getting him fired for his job?

When have you folks cared about what the media does??

And no one would claim it was a klan rally unless the klan declared it a rally....but that is a personal problem if that is your fear....

No one claimed unite the right was a klan rally except the media.

No one in the Tea Party claimed that they were starting a klan rally, but that didn’t stop MSNBC and CNN and the NAACP and the Democratic members of Congress from claiming they were simply because they believe white voices and white votes DON’T matter.

If every white person had a healthy self esteem and a healthy sense of pride in their culture and ancestry there would not be a Democratic Party for black people to vote for. That is why EVERYONE on the modern left seeks to restrict and prevent the right of assembly and the freedom of association for white people.

There were some actual white supremacist behind the Unite The Right rally.

They falsely advertised the rally as being about historical statues, and thus managed to get a lot of people to turn out.


Which is WHY you have good reason to think that they were not any White Supremacist there. Because the White Supremacists lied, and the vast majority of those that showed up, were not them.


Other than that, your post is right on.

 

[Correll]

Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Why would it be partisan?
You don’t think blacks vote independently?

Why are you too much of a pussy to answer a simple question?


Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

The better question is:
Do you believe that blocking registered voters from voting is voter supression?

Voters have a right to vote. How they arrive at their polling place is irrelevant.

Using government funds, to get the voters there, using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.


Not to mention the always important factor of calling out libs on their bullshit.

Our county government provides transportation for seniors to get to the polls

Nothing illegal in it

SO, you think the country paid for a bus being operated by Black Votes Matter?



And you support that?

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

The senior center was correct in what they did and acted within established policy. A RaT was involved in forming the bus ride, thus making it a partisan event.

 

[Correll]

Using government funds, to get the voters there,

Why is this a bad thing, not that it seems that it happened.

using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.

So, what you are saying is that if someone is being driven to the polling place by a partisan they do not deserve to vote?

Nope. I did not say that. DId you see that? If so, seek medical attention.

Then why is it relevant?

There are reasons that partisan groups pretend to be NON-partisan. There are different rules and sometimes tax implications, not to mention that better PR, of pretending to be just helpful, instead of trying to advance your agenda.


And that is called lying.


AND, if they succeed in getting more of their vote out, because of operating under false pretenses, it could make a difference in the elections, and thus national policy.


That is very relevant to everything.

 

[Correll]

That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.


You are just a lying troll.

This might be the dumbest post you have ever made.

I am a little embarrassed for you actually.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

You used the Logical Fallacy of Argument by Ridicule,


because you could NOT refute anything I said, but wanted to. So you tried to hide it, with assholeness.



It did not work.


My point stands.


That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.

Explain how a vote can be "partisan"?

THe actual discussion above was " black people voting" vs "suppressing the vote", not that this particular incident is really voter suppression.



If the group is "partisan" ie heavily biased to one side, then both actions would be partisan.


If the group in question is NOT, then neither would.


Rightwinger, as always, is trying to have it both ways.

Does that somehow justify the actions of the county in stopping them from voting, at least temporarily?

The County Government should CERTAINLY be non-partisan, and should thus NOT be working with PARTISAN get out the vote organizations.

 

[Correll]

That does not make sense. If the vote in question is not partisan, then neither action would be partisan.


IF it is partisan, then both actions would be partisan.


You are just a lying troll.

WTF are you babbling about Klan Boy?

Black people voting is not partisan.......blocking their vote is

You can't just ignore the meanings of words.


Definition of PARTISAN


Definition of partisan (Entry 2 of 3)

"1: feeling, showing, or deriving from strong and sometimes blind adherence to a particular party, faction, cause, or person : exhibiting, characterized by, or resulting from partisanship"


It is completely possible for the act of getting a certain group of voters to the polls, to be partisan, if you are doing it out of partisan motives.


Wait, what am I saying?


i forgot how completely dishonest you are.


Of course YOU can say it. But the response should be laughter at your obvious lie. And you.

So, based upon this definition of partisan, is there any vote that is not partisan?

That's the definition of partisan. Don't act like it is not.


And sure. Obviously. Just insert the word "not" at the beginning of the definition and you have how a vote, or a group of votes would be "not" partisan.


It is very odd that you have to have this explained to you.

So, one more time...is voting a partisan act in and of itself?

If depends on the voter. When I vote, it certainly is.


I am a partisan voter, for one example.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Using government funds, to get the voters there,

Why is this a bad thing, not that it seems that it happened.

using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.

So, what you are saying is that if someone is being driven to the polling place by a partisan they do not deserve to vote?

Nope. I did not say that. DId you see that? If so, seek medical attention.

Then why is it relevant?

There are reasons that partisan groups pretend to be NON-partisan. There are different rules and sometimes tax implications, not to mention that better PR, of pretending to be just helpful, instead of trying to advance your agenda.


And that is called lying.


AND, if they succeed in getting more of their vote out, because of operating under false pretenses, it could make a difference in the elections, and thus national policy.


That is very relevant to everything.

More people voting should always be a good thing, even if they follow a different sheepherder than you do

 

[Harpy Eagle]

WTF are you babbling about Klan Boy?

Black people voting is not partisan.......blocking their vote is

You can't just ignore the meanings of words.


Definition of PARTISAN


Definition of partisan (Entry 2 of 3)

"1: feeling, showing, or deriving from strong and sometimes blind adherence to a particular party, faction, cause, or person : exhibiting, characterized by, or resulting from partisanship"


It is completely possible for the act of getting a certain group of voters to the polls, to be partisan, if you are doing it out of partisan motives.


Wait, what am I saying?


i forgot how completely dishonest you are.


Of course YOU can say it. But the response should be laughter at your obvious lie. And you.

So, based upon this definition of partisan, is there any vote that is not partisan?

That's the definition of partisan. Don't act like it is not.


And sure. Obviously. Just insert the word "not" at the beginning of the definition and you have how a vote, or a group of votes would be "not" partisan.


It is very odd that you have to have this explained to you.

So, one more time...is voting a partisan act in and of itself?

If depends on the voter. When I vote, it certainly is.


I am a partisan voter, for one example.

Is it a bad thing to be a partisan voter?

 

[Correll]

Using government funds, to get the voters there,

Why is this a bad thing, not that it seems that it happened.

using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.

So, what you are saying is that if someone is being driven to the polling place by a partisan they do not deserve to vote?

Nope. I did not say that. DId you see that? If so, seek medical attention.

Then why is it relevant?

There are reasons that partisan groups pretend to be NON-partisan. There are different rules and sometimes tax implications, not to mention that better PR, of pretending to be just helpful, instead of trying to advance your agenda.


And that is called lying.


AND, if they succeed in getting more of their vote out, because of operating under false pretenses, it could make a difference in the elections, and thus national policy.


That is very relevant to everything.

More people voting should always be a good thing, even if they follow a different sheepherder than you do

There is nothing inherently good about higher voter participation.


If a person is to lazy to get to the polls, they are probably too lazy to educate themselves on the issues.