General Strike Law and Legal Definition:
General Strike is a strike by a majority of the workers in key industries throughout a country in a particular region of the country. ... In particular, a general strike involves virtually every union regardless of industry or occupation.
Since Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers the GOP has focused on weakening labor unions and in recent times used the euphemism right to work, for busting unions.
Enough is enough: Trump's callous disregard for the American Worker has come full circle, as Federal Employees are cast aside by his actions to shut down government. Not only will they have bills they cannot pay, the private sector too will soon be closing the doors of retail businesses as Federal Buildings remain empty.
Trump will lose this battle, but too many innocent victims will suffer his ego driven crisis.
If government workers strike that would be the best thing for our country, because then Trump could IMMEDIATELY fire them for refusing to return to work, just as Reagan did with the air traffic controllers.
Of course we realize that being mentally ill wastrels, liberals would sue but it wouldn't matter, it's plainly obvious that the President can sue federal civil service employees outright if they refuse to go to work.
But nobody has to work without pay.
I don't agree with making them work with delayed paychecks either, but these stupid shut downs happen all the time, and these people never went on strike in the past, why is only now with the bad orange man in the White House that people who buy the way have not a of yet missed one paycheck are talking about striking?
If I were Trump , if they strike not only would fire them if they refused an order to return to work, I would prosecute them for violating the Hatch Act, because it is plainly obvious that this is a political statement.
How does the Hatch Act fit with sec. 7 & 8 of the National Labor and Relations Act?
"The NLRA makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee because of that employees union activities or affiliation. Also, employers cannot threaten or coerce employees for engaging in union activity nor can they make promises to employees in exchange for their not engaging in union activities. For other acts that violate the NLRA, click here."
ww.employmentlawhandbook.com/federal-employment-and-labor-laws/nlra/
What? You can't define violating the law a "union activity" , I would hope we can both agree that civil service employees should be completely silent as to their political stances. I mean Imagine if you went to the IRS because you were being audited and the agent auditing you said "Oh, you're a liberal. Well prepare thy anus for this audit" that wouldn't be appropriate.
Neither is protesting what is sadly a normal state of affairs (IE a government shutdown) simply because it's Trump. You know that's the major reason they are talking about striking. Every one of those assholes lived through the Obama era shut down just fine, and they will survive this one too. Difference is, there was no talk of a strike when it was Obama.
The ONLY reason for talk of strike now is because it has become fashionable to protest Trump by all means necessary, and that is fine for private citizens but civil service employees should not be taking sides. That's the entire point of the Hatch Act.
I ask that you be reasonable and look beyond that you hate Trump and enjoy seeing him "got" by any means necessary and instead think about what the facts are. And those facts are that civil service employees should not be taking part in action designed to make a political statement.