nodoginnafight
No Party Affiliation
Amazing how many of these "private" schools cannot survive without taxpayer money.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh! First there's no such thing as "Talking Snake U."
Second, the reason that the University doesn't allow Homosexuals to live together, is that homosexuality is a mental disorder that presents through sexual deviancy. This is a form of delusion, wherein the individual believes that that which is false, is true. Specifically, that the craving for something is a legitimate reason to pursue that something; this without regard to whether that something is viable, healthy or inviable and destructive.
Therefore the University, being about the process of giving systematic instruction toward enlightening the student with regard to what is true and the processes used to determine truth, they'd be doing a disservice to their students to allow them to participate in behavior that dis-informs and misinforms, thus doing the precise opposite of 'the right thing'... ergo: what they're being paid to do.
Then the University shouldn't complain when they revoke it's accrediation, cut off all government funds and other universities have nothing to do with it.
Because clearly it's more important to follow a book that talks about Talking Snakes.[sic]
Gordon's leaders and 99% of its students have different beliefs and standards than you do and they would find such a thing offensive and in violation of their religious convictions. But you have no regard for their feelings and beliefs and you think that a gay couple's desire to shack up on campus should take precedence over them.
Yup. Individual rights should trump institutional rights. every time.
Let's say 99% of the students at Gordon were racists. Would it be okay for them to exclude non-whites because that's what their religion told them to do?
What would be so terrible if gay students simply chose one of the thousands of colleges where they would be free to shack up with whomever they wanted?
Why would a gay person want to attend a private evangelical Christian college anyway? I'm still waiting for an answer to that perfectly reasonable, fair question.
Why would those uppity Negroes want to sit at the front of the bus and drink out of the white drinking fountains and sit at the counters for lunch.... Oh, wait.
And they're not "could happen." Gordon College has been ordered by the regional accreditation board to change its decades-old code of conduct or lose its accreditation in one year. Numerous religious vendors have been coerced or punished for objecting to hosting or servicing gay ceremonies. And in several states, faith-based adoption and foster care organizations have lost and/or been banned from getting state contracts to provide adoption and fostering services because they did not want to place kids in gay homes, especially if the parents specified that they wanted their kids placed in normal homes.
You mean they aren't allow to discriminate against gays anymore. This is a positive development.
As is your habit, you've overshot. And when this is over, you and your bestees will be back in the back of the closet, hopin' and yes... prayin' that no one discovers' their pitiful little secret.
We would have been fine with just accepting you as people... but as you have always done, you could not accept your blessings and decided to take it all. And in so doing, you have lost it all. And by that, I mean you have no political support and your judicial decisions are being ignored, thus, you have lost... it all.
But... LOL... you keep pretending that it's 2008... . I'm sure it will all be just fine.
Hey, Keyboy, I've already explained to you why the Christian Bigots...
Religious colleges that accept taxpayer money have problems, big problems. They can't have it both ways.
All part of trying to appear "normal" and mainstream. Sick bastids, homos are mental
The school needs to go after the gay group and start with civil suits and every legal action available rather than pouting and standing around in a defensive posture.
All part of trying to appear "normal" and mainstream. Sick bastids, homos are mental
Have a drink or ten. Then get gang banged on a pinball machine.
[
It's the cost of bigotry. Get used to it.
If they want to be a private college then be private. The state of Massachusetts should put into law that no state funded scholarships or financial aid can be used at any institution that discriminates against gays.
Problem solved.
Amazing how many of these "private" schools cannot survive without taxpayer money.
Amazing how many of these "private" schools cannot survive without taxpayer money.
The school needs to go after the gay group and start with civil suits and every legal action available rather than pouting and standing around in a defensive posture.
Yeah, waste lots of money on cases that will go no where and/or be thrown out of court.
FAIL.
Liberals continue to use their new, ridiculous definition of "discrimination" and just won't budge from it. I'll point out for about the 40th time that by the new ultra-liberal definition of "discrimination," an Orthodox Jewish photographer would be guilty of "discrimination" if he declined to photograph a "commitment" ceremony between a 60-year-old man and a 13-year-old girl whose parents had consented to her moving in with the old man. By the definition that liberals are using here, that would be "discrimination."
Quite sensibly, "discrimination" used to refer to denying someone a regular service or employment based on their race, nationality, religion, gender, or skin color. No one ever dreamed that some people would pervert the term to mean that a religious vendor could be punished for declining to host or service a gay ceremony or that a Christian college would be threatened with disaccreditation and the loss of federal financial aid for its students because its long-standing code of conduct stipulated that no one--gay or straight--could be a student if they were engaging in sex outside traditional marriage.
Providing that yet another fascist is on the board for stripping people of their constitutional protections, in favor of the advocacy to normalize mental disorder presenting as sexual deviancy, demanding that morality be kicked to the curb and replaced with immorality; which is to say that sound (objective) science, should be disregarded in favor of pop-culture whimsy.
LOL! (Again Reader, the reasoning be advanced by the above cited would-be 'contributor' is the product of the same mental disorder that presents sexual deviancy. Back in the day they were just 'nuts', 'bananas', 'fruit-cakes', 'crackers', 'loony-tunes', 'bat-shit crazy' and 'insane'.
Of course, back then the culture was still viable... with the normalization of that sort of thing being the undeniable indicator of a profound decadence; ergo: a dying culture.
Liberals continue to use their new, ridiculous definition of "discrimination" and just won't budge from it. I'll point out for about the 40th time that by the new ultra-liberal definition of "discrimination," an Orthodox Jewish photographer would be guilty of "discrimination" if he declined to photograph a "commitment" ceremony between a 60-year-old man and a 13-year-old girl whose parents had consented to her moving in with the old man. By the definition that liberals are using here, that would be "discrimination."
JoeB is a militant atheist bigot, similar in lack of character and decency to avgguy, mikegriffiths, etc.
I laughed when avgguy thinks 60 to 80% of folks agree with him. It is more like 90%, including most conservatives and Christians, think the far right socons are loony.
Again, Jake the Fake, go troll somewhere else. I know you crave the attention, but it won't help your problem.
Providing that yet another fascist is on the board for stripping people of their constitutional protections, in favor of the advocacy to normalize mental disorder presenting as sexual deviancy, demanding that morality be kicked to the curb and replaced with immorality; which is to say that sound (objective) science, should be disregarded in favor of pop-culture whimsy.
We aren't talking about "people' here, dude.
Colleges aren't people.