French socialist Hamon is bringing universal income!

[there4eyeM]

No one can. Can anyone accurately project Fillons supply side stuff? Unfortunately, economists seem able to exactly explain why the last problems arose, but can't do the same for the next. One thing is sure; trying over and over again what has failed and expecting it to work is a sign of....

 

[anotherlife]

Fillon was never too well loved, and now many are abandoning him. The great benefactor right now looks to be Macron. He is trying to commandeer the Socialist Party's ground workings. But, seeing how many people participated in the Party's primary, and the common view that Marcon is an arriviste (never elected and always part of an apparatchik élite), things could turn against him. That would put Hamon in a solid position to face the FN. His greatest weakness is lack of experience on the grand scale.

Hamon doesn't stand a chance. A socialist, who advocates legalizing marijuana, opening France to more immigration and providing everybody a minimum salary of 600 Euros (going later to 750 Euros) to everyone when a person turns 18. He provides no estimations as to what effect his many proposals will have on the French economy and this alone could be his undoing. He will probably do well with younger voters but it's very unlikely that he faces Le Pen in the second round.

Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

.

French productivity is the highest in the world. That means French automation is what dominates, so it is the French job market that disappears the fastest. This way, it is logical that Hamon must propose this.

Propose he may, win he won't.

.

If Le Pen ever wins, she will have to introduce it too. For the same reasons. She will just do it after deporting all the Syrians first, before the Syrians seep back after she enacts the universal income.

 

[anotherlife]

Fillon was never too well loved, and now many are abandoning him. The great benefactor right now looks to be Macron. He is trying to commandeer the Socialist Party's ground workings. But, seeing how many people participated in the Party's primary, and the common view that Marcon is an arriviste (never elected and always part of an apparatchik élite), things could turn against him. That would put Hamon in a solid position to face the FN. His greatest weakness is lack of experience on the grand scale.

Hamon doesn't stand a chance. A socialist, who advocates legalizing marijuana, opening France to more immigration and providing everybody a minimum salary of 600 Euros (going later to 750 Euros) to everyone when a person turns 18. He provides no estimations as to what effect his many proposals will have on the French economy and this alone could be his undoing. He will probably do well with younger voters but it's very unlikely that he faces Le Pen in the second round.

Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

.

Universal income, its emblematic measure
This is the main idea of Benoît Hamon put in place a universal basic income . The candidate has definitely managed to make one of the main topics of debate in the primary, forcing his opponents to position on the issue. And critics of the latter, on the form and substance, are clearly not enough to discredit the candidate, even if he has repeatedly changed the terms of its proposal in the final days before the vote.

En savoir plus sur Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

May I remind that the experiment has been tried...and it was a failure.

1. The government conducted a study, 1971-1978 known as the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment, or SIME-DIME, in which low income families were give a guaranteed income, a welfare package with everything liberal policy makers could hope for. Result: for every dollar of extra welfare given, low income recipients reduced their labor by 80 cents. http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/12794.pdf

2. [The results for husbands show that the combination of negative income tax plans tested in SIME/DIME — which, as already mentioned, represents on average a relatively generous cash transfer program with a guarantee of 115% of the poverty line and a tax rate of 50% — has a significant negative effect on hours worked per year. Overview of the Final Report of the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment]

a. Further results: dissolution of families: “This conclusion was unambiguously unfavorable to advocates of a negative income tax that would cover married couples, for two important reasons. First, increased
marital breakups among the poor would increase the numbers on
welfare and the amount of transfer payments, principally because the
separated wife and children would receive higher transfer payments.
Second, marital dissolutions and the usual accompanying absence of
fathers from households with children are generally considered unfavorable outcomes regardless of whether or not the welfare rolls increase.” http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf30/conf30c.pdf

b. “When families received guaranteed income at 90% of the poverty level, there was a 43% increase in black family dissolution and a 63% increase in white family dissolution. At 125% of the poverty levels, dissolutions were 75% and 40%.”
Robert B. Carleson, “Government Is The Problem,” p. 57.

But in the 21st century this is a good result, because we want people to reduce their working hours, not increase them. And as for families, they are history anyways, national statistics puts an average 2 years on marriage durations.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Fillon was never too well loved, and now many are abandoning him. The great benefactor right now looks to be Macron. He is trying to commandeer the Socialist Party's ground workings. But, seeing how many people participated in the Party's primary, and the common view that Marcon is an arriviste (never elected and always part of an apparatchik élite), things could turn against him. That would put Hamon in a solid position to face the FN. His greatest weakness is lack of experience on the grand scale.

Hamon doesn't stand a chance. A socialist, who advocates legalizing marijuana, opening France to more immigration and providing everybody a minimum salary of 600 Euros (going later to 750 Euros) to everyone when a person turns 18. He provides no estimations as to what effect his many proposals will have on the French economy and this alone could be his undoing. He will probably do well with younger voters but it's very unlikely that he faces Le Pen in the second round.

Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

.

Universal income, its emblematic measure
This is the main idea of Benoît Hamon put in place a universal basic income . The candidate has definitely managed to make one of the main topics of debate in the primary, forcing his opponents to position on the issue. And critics of the latter, on the form and substance, are clearly not enough to discredit the candidate, even if he has repeatedly changed the terms of its proposal in the final days before the vote.

En savoir plus sur Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

May I remind that the experiment has been tried...and it was a failure.

1. The government conducted a study, 1971-1978 known as the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment, or SIME-DIME, in which low income families were give a guaranteed income, a welfare package with everything liberal policy makers could hope for. Result: for every dollar of extra welfare given, low income recipients reduced their labor by 80 cents. http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/12794.pdf

2. [The results for husbands show that the combination of negative income tax plans tested in SIME/DIME — which, as already mentioned, represents on average a relatively generous cash transfer program with a guarantee of 115% of the poverty line and a tax rate of 50% — has a significant negative effect on hours worked per year. Overview of the Final Report of the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment]

a. Further results: dissolution of families: “This conclusion was unambiguously unfavorable to advocates of a negative income tax that would cover married couples, for two important reasons. First, increased
marital breakups among the poor would increase the numbers on
welfare and the amount of transfer payments, principally because the
separated wife and children would receive higher transfer payments.
Second, marital dissolutions and the usual accompanying absence of
fathers from households with children are generally considered unfavorable outcomes regardless of whether or not the welfare rolls increase.” http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf30/conf30c.pdf

b. “When families received guaranteed income at 90% of the poverty level, there was a 43% increase in black family dissolution and a 63% increase in white family dissolution. At 125% of the poverty levels, dissolutions were 75% and 40%.”
Robert B. Carleson, “Government Is The Problem,” p. 57.

But in the 21st century this is a good result, because we want people to reduce their working hours, not increase them. And as for families, they are history anyways, national statistics puts an average 2 years on marriage durations.

"And as for families, they are history anyways,.."


1. That will apply if Marxism continues to prevail.
There seems to be a global push-back against....


2. The destruction of bourgeois values and traditional attitudes has been the hallmark of Bolshevism, Communism, Marxism...and it's American spin-off, Modern Liberalism.....the Far Left.
....with this election, it appears that real Americans have had just about enough of the destruction of western civilization.




3. When the Left is strong enough to do so....they are up-front and direct about the policy:

a. "Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie."
Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2... Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)


b. "After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family."
See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.

 

[anotherlife]

True, Hamon is different from the others. He is offering new, interesting ideas and approaches. The safe bet is the "same ol' same ol'".

Would you care to project the impact of Hamon's proposals on the French economy? Sadly Hamon can't.

.

Let me try.

France will have to do like the old USA and squeeze the money from import and export taxes. This will further improve French productivity and automation.

Of course, French businesses may also run away and reopen in Polynesia. Not a problem, France will then squeeze the other members of the European Union like the new east European members or the usual targets such as Greece, Spain, and Portugal.

 

[esthermoon]

A form of world wide feeling of unity among the people themselves, directly, country to country and culture to culture would be good. Glottalization merely for the (further) advantage of 'legal persons'; i.e., corporations, doesn't seem to be in our interests. The nation-state had probably served its purpose in human history and it is time to graduate.

Probably a "good globalization" based on peace and people rights would be a good thing. Unfortunately real globalization seems to be all banks, corporations and global finance
Regarding the nation-state many people in the world want to feel part of something bigger, their people and their nation!

How about part of the human race; there's only one, and there's nothing more important?

Some people feel like being part of the human race is not "enough" for them
They want to be part of Nation because the think their nationality and ethnicity is something different from all the others

Unfortunately, in history that road has led to disharmony, intolerance and conflict.

It's true. But there's something you can't elide from human nature. Maybe it's part of our DNA...who knows

 

[esthermoon]

I'm thinking the same of you Bleipriester!
I think many Europeans want a new Nationalism and hate globalism.

This is interesting. Must say though that nationalism itself is a result of globalization and is controlled by globalists. Europeans, as usual, chase their own tails. They love hating globalism, hehe.

I think Europeans are too much confused for what is happening in their countries (unemployment, immigration, increasing crime, etc...) so they're blaming globalization for all of that

 

[anotherlife]

Fillon was never too well loved, and now many are abandoning him. The great benefactor right now looks to be Macron. He is trying to commandeer the Socialist Party's ground workings. But, seeing how many people participated in the Party's primary, and the common view that Marcon is an arriviste (never elected and always part of an apparatchik élite), things could turn against him. That would put Hamon in a solid position to face the FN. His greatest weakness is lack of experience on the grand scale.

Hamon doesn't stand a chance. A socialist, who advocates legalizing marijuana, opening France to more immigration and providing everybody a minimum salary of 600 Euros (going later to 750 Euros) to everyone when a person turns 18. He provides no estimations as to what effect his many proposals will have on the French economy and this alone could be his undoing. He will probably do well with younger voters but it's very unlikely that he faces Le Pen in the second round.

Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

.

Universal income, its emblematic measure
This is the main idea of Benoît Hamon put in place a universal basic income . The candidate has definitely managed to make one of the main topics of debate in the primary, forcing his opponents to position on the issue. And critics of the latter, on the form and substance, are clearly not enough to discredit the candidate, even if he has repeatedly changed the terms of its proposal in the final days before the vote.

En savoir plus sur Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

May I remind that the experiment has been tried...and it was a failure.

1. The government conducted a study, 1971-1978 known as the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment, or SIME-DIME, in which low income families were give a guaranteed income, a welfare package with everything liberal policy makers could hope for. Result: for every dollar of extra welfare given, low income recipients reduced their labor by 80 cents. http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/12794.pdf

2. [The results for husbands show that the combination of negative income tax plans tested in SIME/DIME — which, as already mentioned, represents on average a relatively generous cash transfer program with a guarantee of 115% of the poverty line and a tax rate of 50% — has a significant negative effect on hours worked per year. Overview of the Final Report of the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment]

a. Further results: dissolution of families: “This conclusion was unambiguously unfavorable to advocates of a negative income tax that would cover married couples, for two important reasons. First, increased
marital breakups among the poor would increase the numbers on
welfare and the amount of transfer payments, principally because the
separated wife and children would receive higher transfer payments.
Second, marital dissolutions and the usual accompanying absence of
fathers from households with children are generally considered unfavorable outcomes regardless of whether or not the welfare rolls increase.” http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf30/conf30c.pdf

b. “When families received guaranteed income at 90% of the poverty level, there was a 43% increase in black family dissolution and a 63% increase in white family dissolution. At 125% of the poverty levels, dissolutions were 75% and 40%.”
Robert B. Carleson, “Government Is The Problem,” p. 57.

But in the 21st century this is a good result, because we want people to reduce their working hours, not increase them. And as for families, they are history anyways, national statistics puts an average 2 years on marriage durations.

"And as for families, they are history anyways,.."


1. That will apply if Marxism continues to prevail.
There seems to be a global push-back against....


2. The destruction of bourgeois values and traditional attitudes has been the hallmark of Bolshevism, Communism, Marxism...and it's American spin-off, Modern Liberalism.....the Far Left.
....with this election, it appears that real Americans have had just about enough of the destruction of western civilization.




3. When the Left is strong enough to do so....they are up-front and direct about the policy:

a. "Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie."
Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2... Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)


b. "After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family."
See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.

Yes. What Marxism could not accomplish, modern imperialism with its technological automation did. This is scary, but a fact, so now everyone is a bio mass instead of human. No matter how much people on the right protest with Trump. But there is an interesting phenomenon too. Even here in France, there are people like I, who refuse to participate in this perfected modern game of Marxism. Looks like Bastiat is right, but the universal income may actually end up reducing the centralized oppression and free up resources to preserve what you are. This is also new, so can be manipulated to link to a single European language of administration, say English. A way big step ahead.

 

[anotherlife]

I'm thinking the same of you Bleipriester!
I think many Europeans want a new Nationalism and hate globalism.

This is interesting. Must say though that nationalism itself is a result of globalization and is controlled by globalists. Europeans, as usual, chase their own tails. They love hating globalism, hehe.

I think Europeans are too much confused for what is happening in their countries (unemployment, immigration, increasing crime, etc...) so they're blaming globalization for all of that

Yes. Europeans are the most closely controlled people in the world. I always get surprised how imprisoned the minds of Europeans are, compared to when I speak with noneuropeans or minorities.

 

[Decus]

Fillon was never too well loved, and now many are abandoning him. The great benefactor right now looks to be Macron. He is trying to commandeer the Socialist Party's ground workings. But, seeing how many people participated in the Party's primary, and the common view that Marcon is an arriviste (never elected and always part of an apparatchik élite), things could turn against him. That would put Hamon in a solid position to face the FN. His greatest weakness is lack of experience on the grand scale.

Hamon doesn't stand a chance. A socialist, who advocates legalizing marijuana, opening France to more immigration and providing everybody a minimum salary of 600 Euros (going later to 750 Euros) to everyone when a person turns 18. He provides no estimations as to what effect his many proposals will have on the French economy and this alone could be his undoing. He will probably do well with younger voters but it's very unlikely that he faces Le Pen in the second round.

Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

.

French productivity is the highest in the world. That means French automation is what dominates, so it is the French job market that disappears the fastest. This way, it is logical that Hamon must propose this.

Propose he may, win he won't.

.

If Le Pen ever wins, she will have to introduce it too. For the same reasons. She will just do it after deporting all the Syrians first, before the Syrians seep back after she enacts the universal income.

Le Pen and FN's economic policy is sadly one of state control. Le Pen's popularity is based solely on France's frustration with immigration. Without her stance on immigration she would have no chance at the presidency.

.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Fillon was never too well loved, and now many are abandoning him. The great benefactor right now looks to be Macron. He is trying to commandeer the Socialist Party's ground workings. But, seeing how many people participated in the Party's primary, and the common view that Marcon is an arriviste (never elected and always part of an apparatchik élite), things could turn against him. That would put Hamon in a solid position to face the FN. His greatest weakness is lack of experience on the grand scale.

Hamon doesn't stand a chance. A socialist, who advocates legalizing marijuana, opening France to more immigration and providing everybody a minimum salary of 600 Euros (going later to 750 Euros) to everyone when a person turns 18. He provides no estimations as to what effect his many proposals will have on the French economy and this alone could be his undoing. He will probably do well with younger voters but it's very unlikely that he faces Le Pen in the second round.

Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

.

Universal income, its emblematic measure
This is the main idea of Benoît Hamon put in place a universal basic income . The candidate has definitely managed to make one of the main topics of debate in the primary, forcing his opponents to position on the issue. And critics of the latter, on the form and substance, are clearly not enough to discredit the candidate, even if he has repeatedly changed the terms of its proposal in the final days before the vote.

En savoir plus sur Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

May I remind that the experiment has been tried...and it was a failure.

1. The government conducted a study, 1971-1978 known as the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment, or SIME-DIME, in which low income families were give a guaranteed income, a welfare package with everything liberal policy makers could hope for. Result: for every dollar of extra welfare given, low income recipients reduced their labor by 80 cents. http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/12794.pdf

2. [The results for husbands show that the combination of negative income tax plans tested in SIME/DIME — which, as already mentioned, represents on average a relatively generous cash transfer program with a guarantee of 115% of the poverty line and a tax rate of 50% — has a significant negative effect on hours worked per year. Overview of the Final Report of the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment]

a. Further results: dissolution of families: “This conclusion was unambiguously unfavorable to advocates of a negative income tax that would cover married couples, for two important reasons. First, increased
marital breakups among the poor would increase the numbers on
welfare and the amount of transfer payments, principally because the
separated wife and children would receive higher transfer payments.
Second, marital dissolutions and the usual accompanying absence of
fathers from households with children are generally considered unfavorable outcomes regardless of whether or not the welfare rolls increase.” http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf30/conf30c.pdf

b. “When families received guaranteed income at 90% of the poverty level, there was a 43% increase in black family dissolution and a 63% increase in white family dissolution. At 125% of the poverty levels, dissolutions were 75% and 40%.”
Robert B. Carleson, “Government Is The Problem,” p. 57.

But in the 21st century this is a good result, because we want people to reduce their working hours, not increase them. And as for families, they are history anyways, national statistics puts an average 2 years on marriage durations.

"And as for families, they are history anyways,.."


1. That will apply if Marxism continues to prevail.
There seems to be a global push-back against....


2. The destruction of bourgeois values and traditional attitudes has been the hallmark of Bolshevism, Communism, Marxism...and it's American spin-off, Modern Liberalism.....the Far Left.
....with this election, it appears that real Americans have had just about enough of the destruction of western civilization.




3. When the Left is strong enough to do so....they are up-front and direct about the policy:

a. "Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie."
Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2... Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)


b. "After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family."
See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.

Yes. What Marxism could not accomplish, modern imperialism with its technological automation did. This is scary, but a fact, so now everyone is a bio mass instead of human. No matter how much people on the right protest with Trump. But there is an interesting phenomenon too. Even here in France, there are people like I, who refuse to participate in this perfected modern game of Marxism. Looks like Bastiat is right, but the universal income may actually end up reducing the centralized oppression and free up resources to preserve what you are. This is also new, so can be manipulated to link to a single European language of administration, say English. A way big step ahead.

"What Marxism could not accomplish..."

Why would you suggest that?

America just dismissed the President who was the titular head of the LGBT Movement, and his Marxist Party is still powerful, nor has it given up its intentions.


The final cards haven't been dealt.

 

[anotherlife]

Hamon doesn't stand a chance. A socialist, who advocates legalizing marijuana, opening France to more immigration and providing everybody a minimum salary of 600 Euros (going later to 750 Euros) to everyone when a person turns 18. He provides no estimations as to what effect his many proposals will have on the French economy and this alone could be his undoing. He will probably do well with younger voters but it's very unlikely that he faces Le Pen in the second round.

Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

.

Universal income, its emblematic measure
This is the main idea of Benoît Hamon put in place a universal basic income . The candidate has definitely managed to make one of the main topics of debate in the primary, forcing his opponents to position on the issue. And critics of the latter, on the form and substance, are clearly not enough to discredit the candidate, even if he has repeatedly changed the terms of its proposal in the final days before the vote.

En savoir plus sur Que contient le programme de Benoît Hamon pour la présidentielle ?

May I remind that the experiment has been tried...and it was a failure.

1. The government conducted a study, 1971-1978 known as the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment, or SIME-DIME, in which low income families were give a guaranteed income, a welfare package with everything liberal policy makers could hope for. Result: for every dollar of extra welfare given, low income recipients reduced their labor by 80 cents. http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/12794.pdf

2. [The results for husbands show that the combination of negative income tax plans tested in SIME/DIME — which, as already mentioned, represents on average a relatively generous cash transfer program with a guarantee of 115% of the poverty line and a tax rate of 50% — has a significant negative effect on hours worked per year. Overview of the Final Report of the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment]

a. Further results: dissolution of families: “This conclusion was unambiguously unfavorable to advocates of a negative income tax that would cover married couples, for two important reasons. First, increased
marital breakups among the poor would increase the numbers on
welfare and the amount of transfer payments, principally because the
separated wife and children would receive higher transfer payments.
Second, marital dissolutions and the usual accompanying absence of
fathers from households with children are generally considered unfavorable outcomes regardless of whether or not the welfare rolls increase.” http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf30/conf30c.pdf

b. “When families received guaranteed income at 90% of the poverty level, there was a 43% increase in black family dissolution and a 63% increase in white family dissolution. At 125% of the poverty levels, dissolutions were 75% and 40%.”
Robert B. Carleson, “Government Is The Problem,” p. 57.

But in the 21st century this is a good result, because we want people to reduce their working hours, not increase them. And as for families, they are history anyways, national statistics puts an average 2 years on marriage durations.

"And as for families, they are history anyways,.."


1. That will apply if Marxism continues to prevail.
There seems to be a global push-back against....


2. The destruction of bourgeois values and traditional attitudes has been the hallmark of Bolshevism, Communism, Marxism...and it's American spin-off, Modern Liberalism.....the Far Left.
....with this election, it appears that real Americans have had just about enough of the destruction of western civilization.




3. When the Left is strong enough to do so....they are up-front and direct about the policy:

a. "Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie."
Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2... Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)


b. "After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family."
See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.

Yes. What Marxism could not accomplish, modern imperialism with its technological automation did. This is scary, but a fact, so now everyone is a bio mass instead of human. No matter how much people on the right protest with Trump. But there is an interesting phenomenon too. Even here in France, there are people like I, who refuse to participate in this perfected modern game of Marxism. Looks like Bastiat is right, but the universal income may actually end up reducing the centralized oppression and free up resources to preserve what you are. This is also new, so can be manipulated to link to a single European language of administration, say English. A way big step ahead.

"What Marxism could not accomplish..."

Why would you suggest that?

America just dismissed the President who was the titular head of the LGBT Movement, and his Marxist Party is still powerful, nor has it given up its intentions.


The final cards haven't been dealt.

As Decus says above about France, no matter which party you end up with, you are drifted towards unlimited centralized state control. Statism. The most important Trump policies are the planned deregulations, which are now going on with the formal target of removing 70 % of regulations of all industries. For example, your credit card debt will run on an arbitrary and randomized interest rate changing monthly, or your drinking water supply will not be monitored for sewage pollutants seeping back into it. Mussolini was right, when he said that from the 20th century on, your God will be the state, starting with national socialism and national anything. The cartels that benefit from Trump's deregulations are those that control the American state. Same as Marxist totalitarianism.

 

[there4eyeM]

In the unregulated age of the industrial revolution, companies effectively owned workers, down to their homes and the stores they had to buy their goods. Without monitoring things together, we get monitored by the powerful.

 

[anotherlife]

In the unregulated age of the industrial revolution, companies effectively owned workers, down to their homes and the stores they had to buy their goods. Without monitoring things together, we get monitored by the powerful.

Yes. Try to tell this to the immigration programmed Trump bitches. Next time it will be enough to tell them that green witches are coming with brooms from the sky, and then they will happily enslave themselves to a corporation that promises chicken wire around every cloud.