progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 64,583
- 39,407
- 2,615
tax breaks arent subsidies no matter what you post,,so if we arent talking about tax breaks all thats left is payments,,but you said they are receiving payments,,did they receive tax payer funds or not???you said they were receiving payments,, is that true or not??what is it you disagree with about the question?? or is it you dont want to answer because it debunks your narrative??subsidies in the way of what?? did they receive payments from the tax payer or not??not seeing where either was receiving tax payer funds,, could you point i out for us??This is a bigger argument than this one case. What we see here is a company making grand promises to get huge socialist programs to finance them from the taxpayers. They promise the world but realities are far different.
Foxconn Finally Admits It Won't Create 13,000 Jobs in Wisconsin
This is why I fully supported AOC coming out and telling Amazon NO on their demands on taxpayers funds. There was no way their promises were ever going to come to fruition. It's odd at how those who condemn government socialism so quickly support things like this.
If you have a business, the taxpayers should never be on the hook for your costs.
But some ideas make so little economic sense that even the largest corporate subsidy ever awarded by a state government isn't enough.
Corporate subsidy by the state.
I stated what I disagree with. Corporate socialism.
simple tax breaks are not socialism,,
But some ideas make so little economic sense that even the largest corporate subsidy ever awarded by a state government isn't enough.
keeping your own money is not a subsidy,,
The article states subsidy.
dont care what the article says cause tax breaks arent subsidies,,,
I don't believe I ever used the word "payments". If tax breaks aren't subsidies then tax breaks aren't what are being discussed.
not seeing where they are receiving payments do you??
I've already provided the quotes for you.