Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

[Stann]

This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."

Legal expert sees no viable case against James Comey after Trump DOJ indictment

The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey "seems to be premised on something that's not true," Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy cautions.

www.foxbusiness.com

Breaking news now ( 11-24-25 ) both cases dismissed ,the one against Coney and Letita James. The cases were determined baseless. trump may be charged with political tampering of the law. trump was too brazen in his actions.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So they go to another atty.

'without prejudice'

Hahaha

Maybe you're not aware, but Trump had to illegally appoint an attorney with zero experience, because no experienced attorney with a shred of ethics would bring the case.

and the statute of limitations expired, on Comey.

 

[Stann]

Hahaha

Maybe you're not aware, but Trump had to illegally appoint an attorney with zero experience, because no experienced attorney with a shred of ethics would bring the case.

and the statute of limitations expired, on Comey.

The key word is " illegally ". Now will trump be charged for abusing the law ? Just another crime in his list.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The key word is " illegally ". Now will trump be charged for abusing the law ? Just another crime in his list.

Nope, the corrupt SCOTUS gave him immunity.

 

[Delldude]

Hahaha

Maybe you're not aware, but Trump had to illegally appoint an attorney with zero experience, because no experienced attorney with a shred of ethics would bring the case.

and the statute of limitations expired, on Comey.

However, Currie dismissed the cases “without prejudice.” That could allow them to be re-filed, but Comey’s attorneys have already indicated that they will argue that he cannot be re-indicted because the statute of limitations in his case expired in September.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

However, Currie dismissed the cases “without prejudice.” That could allow them to be re-filed, but Comey’s attorneys have already indicated that they will argue that he cannot be re-indicted because the statute of limitations in his case expired in September.

It sure did.

And no self respecting attorney will bring the cases. And Trump could not get an appointment like the embarrassing Halligan past the confirmation process.

I guess the Republicans are having a hard time finding ham sandwiches again!

 

[struth]

Breaking news now ( 11-24-25 ) both cases dismissed ,the one against Coney and Letita James. The cases were determined baseless. trump may be charged with political tampering of the law. trump was too brazen in his actions.

The judge didn’t dismiss them on the facts, there was a technical issue with how the US attorney was appointed

Easy fix and another indictment

 

[struth]

It sure did.

And no self respecting attorney will bring the cases. And Trump could not get an appointment like the embarrassing Halligan past the confirmation process.

I guess the Republicans are having a hard time finding ham sandwiches again!

No they were indicted by a grand jury, and will be again

The judge found a small technical issue with how the US Attorny assumed office, easy fix,

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No they were indicted by a grand jury, and will be again

False. I'm embarrassed for you that you can't grasp what has happened, here.

 

[Stann]

Nope, the corrupt SCOTUS gave him immunity.

Then SCOTUS needs to be prosecuted.

 

[struth]

False. I'm embarrassed for you that you can't grasp what has happened, here.

Haha what do you “think” I can’t grasp?

 

[Delldude]

It sure did.

And no self respecting attorney will bring the cases. And Trump could not get an appointment like the embarrassing Halligan past the confirmation process.

I guess the Republicans are having a hard time finding ham sandwiches again!

Subway's are now the bomb.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then SCOTUS needs to be prosecuted.

Can't, sorry.

You see the stakes. You see what happens, when we elect a career criminal.

 

[pknopp]

Breaking news now ( 11-24-25 ) both cases dismissed ,the one against Coney and Letita James. The cases were determined baseless. trump may be charged with political tampering of the law. trump was too brazen in his actions.

Lol, sheesh, who could have seen this coming? Lol

Typical Trump......all sorts of accusations but when it comes to prove them in court he comes empty handed.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Subway's are now the bomb.

Pirro truly could not indict a ham sandwich.

 

[Stann]

Haha what do you “think” I can’t grasp?

Idiots like you usually miss out on a lot. Keep laughing , that's all you've got going for you.

 

[Delldude]

You know this was a fed dist judge.

 

[struth]

Lol, sheesh, who could have seen this coming? Lol

Typical Trump......all sorts of accusations but when it comes to prove them in court he comes empty handed.

Haha the case wasn’t dismissed on the facts in the indictment

It was dismissed on a technically based on how the Acting US Attorney was appointed. Which will likely be appealed because it’s not as obvious as the illegal appointment of special counse Jack smith

Either way the defendants will be reindicted as the facts the grand jury heard don’t change

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You know this was a fed dist judge.

I.E., the correct judge for the case.

Looks like everyone but Trump and his corrupt toadies followed the rules.

Again.

 

[Marener]

The judge didn’t dismiss them on the facts, there was a technical issue with how the US attorney was appointed

Lindsey Halligan needs to be prosecuted for her illegal actions.