Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed

[Lockback]

Lol yea don't trust my lying eyes. By the way since we are on the subject of lying.

Multiple Michigan members of Congress may have been on Minnesota assassins’ hit list • Michigan Advance All Democrats on the list

The Minnesota assassin was apparently upset that his victims/hit list targets weren't leftist enough.

 

[forkup]

The Minnesota assassin was apparently upset that his victims/hit list targets weren't leftist enough.

Sure sparky.

 

[Lockback]

Sure sparky.

I know you won't look into it.
Too scared to. The truth is anathema to leftists.

 

[Marener]

I know you won't look into it.
Too scared to. The truth is anathema to leftists.

It would be nice if boomers didn’t think “I read it on Facebook” constitutes research.

 

[forkup]

[

I know you won't look into it.
Too scared to. The truth is anathema to leftists.

You're making a claim. Feel free to back it up. That's how it typically works. The person who says something backs it up. Otherwise it's nothing more than an assertion. So surprise me and back up what you say.

I'll help by rebuking another claim you gave that I knew was BS. You said left v right violence was 30 to 1. Funny that. Not according to this
Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States | Published in Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society or this What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism

So tell me Sparky. What do you have to support your claims? Any of them

 

[forkup]

It would be nice if boomers didn’t think “I read it on Facebook” constitutes research.

Will never happen. Funny thing is that he believes that as long he simply makes a claim his position is proven.

 

[Lockback]

It would be nice if boomers didn’t think “I read it on Facebook” constitutes research.

I didn't "read it on Facebook".

[
You're making a claim. Feel free to back it up. That's how it typically works. The person who says something backs it up. Otherwise it's nothing more than an assertion. So surprise me and back up what you say.

I'll help by rebuking another claim you gave that I knew was BS. You said left v right violence was 30 to 1. Funny that. Not according to this
Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States | Published in Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society or this What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism

So tell me Sparky. What do you have to support your claims? Any of them

Hilariously screwed up "studies". Included in many of them are neo-Nazi prison gang attacks on the Right while ignoring, say, trans attacks on school children on the Left.
I let my eyes and ears give me information and the ratio isn't even close. The Left owns it and has for years. They love violence. They adore it. But the worst part is that the Democrats literally never criticize it and just look the other way as it starts to rage more and more out of control. They'd better clean up their act or come next summer we're going to have fire and riots on a scale we've never seen. You can't whip up people calling the sitting President a "Nazi" or "fascist" and not expect to get some loose cannons out there thinking they're doing the right thing by knocking off law enforcement or regular citizens for being "Nazis". We've seen dozens of examples already.
The 30:1 ratio wasn't a hard fact, just a good guess on my part.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not a case of personal vendetta rather holding one accountable for obstruction of Justice, least not the trust of the American People they swore to represent and protect.

Clearly it was a personal vendetta, as the fat rapist had to illegally appoint a corrupt, unqualified bag of shit to bring the case.

 

[Marener]

I didn't "read it on Facebook".

Oh sorry. Saw it on TikTok.

 

[Lockback]

Clearly it was a personal vendetta, as the fat rapist had to illegally appoint a corrupt, unqualified bag of shit to bring the case.

Speaking of unqualified bags of shit ...

 

[forkup]

I didn't "read it on Facebook".

Hilariously screwed up "studies". Included in many of them are neo-Nazi prison gang attacks on the Right while ignoring, say, trans attacks on school children on the Left.
I let my eyes and ears give me information and the ratio isn't even close. The Left owns it and has for years. They love violence. They adore it. But the worst part is that the Democrats literally never criticize it and just look the other way as it starts to rage more and more out of control. They'd better clean up their act or come next summer we're going to have fire and riots on a scale we've never seen. You can't whip up people calling the sitting President a "Nazi" or "fascist" and not expect to get some loose cannons out there thinking they're doing the right thing by knocking off law enforcement or regular citizens for being "Nazis". We've seen dozens of examples already.
The 30:1 ratio wasn't a hard fact, just a good guess on my part.

So as I've said all along. You say something, get asked to back it up, simply go and rant some more.

I back up what I say, you ignore it, or like in this case simply say that it's not true, without ever trying to go beyond a simple assertion.

By the way, that second study was ordered by the DOJ under Trump. And when those results came back, the study was quietly removed from their website.

And your "good" guess is off by about 10000 percent.

I didn't "read it on Facebook".

Hilariously screwed up "studies". Included in many of them are neo-Nazi prison gang attacks on the Right while ignoring, say, trans attacks on school children on the Left.
I let my eyes and ears give me information and the ratio isn't even close. The Left owns it and has for years. They love violence. They adore it. But the worst part is that the Democrats literally never criticize it and just look the other way as it starts to rage more and more out of control. They'd better clean up their act or come next summer we're going to have fire and riots on a scale we've never seen. You can't whip up people calling the sitting President a "Nazi" or "fascist" and not expect to get some loose cannons out there thinking they're doing the right thing by knocking off law enforcement or regular citizens for being "Nazis". We've seen dozens of examples already.
The 30:1 ratio wasn't a hard fact, just a good guess on my part.

You didn't read it anywhere, I suspect, since no matter how many times you are asked to back up what you say, you simply... don't...not...ever. You simply rant some more about something else.

That second study by the way. Ordered by the DOJ under Trump.

So you're "good" guess...of by the difference between 30 to 1 advantage left, to 83 percent to 17 percent advantage right so about 10000 percent off. I sure hope you don't cook with those guessing skills.

As for the last rant you switched to.

In this OP alone I've said on at least 2 separate occasions probably more that I feel that the people who loot and use violence should be arrested and prosecuted. I've said many more times that I don't condone it. I've even gone as far as to call the protests themselves unwise with this virus going one. So what blind eye are you referring to or for that matter what are "people like me?" You want me to go out and find me some looters and attack them using a strongly worded protest? I have a pretty sharp pen but I don't think my ego is big enough to think I'll make an impression.

Me personally pointing out that I criticize violence by my "side" when it occurs when another person tried to claim I don't do exactly what I do. So yet again and for about time gazillion, you are emphatically wrong.

So go ahead, rant some more about something else, I'll show how wrong you are some more. I don't tire of showing that you are full of shit, I enjoy it.

 

[Lockback]

So as I've said all along. You say something, get asked to back it up, simply go and rant some more.

I back up what I say, you ignore it, or like in this case simply say that it's not true, without ever trying to go beyond a simple assertion.

By the way, that second study was ordered by the DOJ under Trump. And when those results came back, the study was quietly removed from their website.

And your "good" guess is off by about 10000 percent.
You didn't read it anywhere, I suspect, since no matter how many times you are asked to back up what you say, you simply... don't...not...ever. You simply rant some more about something else.

That second study by the way. Ordered by the DOJ under Trump.

So you're "good" guess...of by the difference between 30 to 1 advantage left, to 83 percent to 17 percent advantage right so about 10000 percent off. I sure hope you don't cook with those guessing skills.

As for the last rant you switched to.


Me personally pointing out that I criticize violence by my "side" when it occurs when another person tried to claim I don't do exactly what I do. So yet again and for about time gazillion, you are emphatically wrong.

So go ahead, rant some more about something else, I'll show how wrong you are some more. I don't tire of showing that you are full of shit, I enjoy it.

You just keep lying and lying and lying and thinking your winning.
You're not. Go smoke some weed and go to bed, asshole. You don't impress me with your stupid rants that are based on you throwing a hissy fit, not facts.

 

[forkup]

You just keep lying and lying and lying and thinking your winning.
You're not. Go smoke some weed and go to bed, asshole. You don't impress me with your stupid rants that are based on you throwing a hissy fit, not facts.

If calling me an asshole or liar proved one of your claims, I must’ve missed it.
And no, I’m not going to bed or smoke weed, I prefer whiskey, thanks. But feel free to keep projecting your bedtime habits onto me; it’s illuminating.
Meanwhile, I’m still waiting: when are you going to support any of your claims with something resembling facts?

 

[Lockback]

If calling me an asshole or liar proved one of your claims, I must’ve missed it.
And no, I’m not going to bed or smoke weed, I prefer whiskey, thanks. But feel free to keep projecting your bedtime habits onto me; it’s illuminating.
Meanwhile, I’m still waiting: when are you going to support any of your claims with something resembling facts?

I already have.
Sorry reading comprehension isn't your strong point.
I'm a whiskey guy too. I just figured you for a burned out hippie. You think like one.

 

[forkup]

I already have.
Sorry reading comprehension isn't your strong point.
I'm a whiskey guy too. I just figured you for a burned out hippie. You think like one.

Have what? The only “evidence” you’ve produced was a Dunning–Kruger meme, which is unintentionally the most accurate thing you’ve posted.
If you want your assertions to count as facts, you’ll need more than confidence.
So go ahead, take another swing.

 

[Delldude]

Threat to disbar James.

WASHINGTON — New York Attorney General Letitia James was hit with a bar complaint from a right-leaning group on Friday, days after having her federal mortgage fraud charges tossed by a judge in a temporary procedural win.

The Center to Advance Security in America submitted a request with the Manhattan and Bronx-focused Attorney Grievance Committee for the state to investigate James’ potentially “illegal and dishonest conduct” leading to the criminal charges.

“Fraud, misrepresentation, honesty and trustworthiness are all factors that the Rules of Professional Conduct expressly factor when weighing whether to discipline an attorney,” wrote Curtis Schube, the group’s director of research and policy, in the four-page complaint.

“The Committee, therefore, should immediately investigate the allegations against James and, if by ‘preponderance of the evidence’ the allegations are substantiated, she should be disciplined accordingly.”

Exclusive | NY AG Letitia James hit with bar complaint after having mortgage fraud charges thrown out

The Center to Advance Security in America asked New York’s Attorney Grievance Committee to “immediately investigate” James — and consider disciplining her.

nypost.com

 

[DonGlock26]

Stay tuned:



Starts at 2:10

 

[DonGlock26]

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/us-justice-dept-weighs-seeking-new-indictments-trump-foes-comey-james-sources-2025-12-01/

 

[DonGlock26]

"Justice Dept. Will Appeal Dismissal of Comey and James Indictments


The Trump administration had vowed to fight a judge’s decision to dismiss unrelated criminal charges against James Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Letitia James, the attorney general of New York.



The Justice Department said on Friday that it would appeal the dismissals of its criminal cases against James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Attorney General Letitia James of New York, two frequent targets of President Trump.

The move could provide the department with a path to revive charges against Mr. Comey and Ms. James after the courts threw up a number of roadblocks to the administration’s bid to bring new indictments against them. It came weeks after Attorney General Pam Bondi pledged to do so.

Any appeal would be handled by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which sits in Richmond, Va. Because the cases raise questions about the boundaries between presidential power and congressional authority, they could ultimately go to the Supreme Court."


https://archive.is/96FNM#selection-683.0-691.253

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Threat to disbar James.

WASHINGTON — New York Attorney General Letitia James was hit with a bar complaint from a right-leaning group on Friday, days after having her federal mortgage fraud charges tossed by a judge in a temporary procedural win.

The Center to Advance Security in America submitted a request with the Manhattan and Bronx-focused Attorney Grievance Committee for the state to investigate James’ potentially “illegal and dishonest conduct” leading to the criminal charges.

“Fraud, misrepresentation, honesty and trustworthiness are all factors that the Rules of Professional Conduct expressly factor when weighing whether to discipline an attorney,” wrote Curtis Schube, the group’s director of research and policy, in the four-page complaint.

“The Committee, therefore, should immediately investigate the allegations against James and, if by ‘preponderance of the evidence’ the allegations are substantiated, she should be disciplined accordingly.”

Exclusive | NY AG Letitia James hit with bar complaint after having mortgage fraud charges thrown out

The Center to Advance Security in America asked New York’s Attorney Grievance Committee to “immediately investigate” James — and consider disciplining her.

nypost.com

Theater for rubes