Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

I.E., the correct judge for the case.

Looks like everyone but Trump and his corrupt toadies followed the rules.

Again.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Monday dismissed the criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, concluding that the prosecutor who brought the charges at President Donald Trump’s urging was illegally appointed by the Justice Department.

The rulings from U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie
halt at least for now a pair of prosecutions that had hastened concerns that the Justice Department was being weaponized to pursue the president’s political adversaries and amount to a stunning rebuke of the Trump administration’s legal maneuvering to install a loyal, and inexperienced, prosecutor willing to file the cases.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Monday dismissed the criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, concluding that the prosecutor who brought the charges at President Donald Trump’s urging was illegally appointed by the Justice Department.

The rulings from U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie
halt at least for now a pair of prosecutions that had hastened concerns that the Justice Department was being weaponized to pursue the president’s political adversaries and amount to a stunning rebuke of the Trump administration’s legal maneuvering to install a loyal, and inexperienced, prosecutor willing to file the cases.
So now journalists dictate your thoughts. Interesting.

In reality, the cases are done. For the reasons stated to you, that you are ignoring in favor of your fantasies.
 
I.E., the correct judge for the case.

Looks like everyone but Trump and his corrupt toadies followed the rules.

Again.
Well a grand jury still thinks otherwise, hopefully the people will be able to get their case against these folks heard, once the technically is fixed
 
Lindsey Halligan needs to be prosecuted for her illegal actions.
And trump appointed her , it's a vicious circle. Can't get to the root of the whole problem. trump needs to go !
 
Haha the case wasn’t dismissed on the facts in the indictment

It was dismissed on a technically based on how the Acting US Attorney was appointed. Which will likely be appealed because it’s not as obvious as the illegal appointment of special counse Jack smith

Either way the defendants will be reindicted as the facts the grand jury heard don’t change

Trump follows up on nothing. Its over, on to the next. Lol
 
Illegally prosecuting Comey. Illegally going before a grand jury. Impersonating law enforcement.
What crime did she break?

Did she know that a district court would rule this way? Or was she acting under legal cover of law? Moreover should we see what a circuit court rules?

It’s not like it’s over like the Jack smith case, where he admitted he was illegally appointed
 
Hahaha

Maybe you're not aware, but Trump had to illegally appoint an attorney with zero experience, because no experienced attorney with a shred of ethics would bring the case.

and the statute of limitations expired, on Comey.
He can only attract the desperate attorney dregs now.
 
What crime did she break?
I don’t know. You said Jack Smith broke the law because he was illegally appointed so I assumed you wanted to apply that logic equally.

But of course, you’re a hack so….
 
He can only attract the desperate attorney dregs now.
And he can't get those through the confirmation process.

It's so simple. No experienced, ethical attorney would bring the case. So Trump had to illegally appoint an unethical , incompetent, unqualified person even to secure the indictment.

The courts said no.
 
I don’t know. You said Jack Smith broke the law because he was illegally appointed so I assumed you wanted to apply that logic equally.

But of course, you’re a hack so….
Totally different fact patten

Jack Smith was illegally appointed as a “special prospector” to go after his bosses political rival

An acting US attorney got indictments in this case against people that are high profile Dems for actual crimes, and there is a technical issue on the acting appointment statute. The indictments will be back and with that said the ruling actually appealed becsuse there is a legit issue with the appointments of acting US attorneys unlike the Jack Smith case
 
15th post
Lol, sheesh, who could have seen this coming? Lol

Typical Trump......all sorts of accusations but when it comes to prove them in court he comes empty handed.
I knew trump was going to use " his " DOJ for these " witch hunts ". He brazenly claimed others were doing. That was the first clue , then all these appointments. He was weaponizing it right off the bat. Only hurt himself as usual.
 
Totally different fact patten

Jack Smith was illegally appointed as a “special prospector” to go after his bosses political rival

An acting US attorney got indictments in this case against people that are high profile Dems for actual crimes, and there is a technical issue on the acting appointment statute. The indictments will be back and with that said the ruling actually appealed becsuse there is a legit issue with the appointments of acting US attorneys unlike the Jack Smith case
What kinda dressing to want on that word salad?
 
So now journalists dictate your thoughts. Interesting.

In reality, the cases are done. For the reasons stated to you, that you are ignoring in favor of your fantasies.
If they are done, as you say, why are Comeys lawyers going to argue SOL has run out?
Should be nothing to argue about if you're correct, but they're going to argue.......in reality..... :biggrin:
 
Back
Top Bottom