Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

[Stann]

47 "claims" that Comey lied, but offers to no real proof of those lies. As often as 47 has lied, it is amazing his cult still believes him.

It's amazing ANYONE believes him.amymore , especially now that his insanity is taking over and is very noticeable.

 

[Delldude]

deciding whether a judge is good or not based on who appointed them suborns justice.

Someone should notify MSM.

 

[Stann]

I would usually agree, but Trump and Bondi aren't going to bend over easily.

dimocrap FILTH dragged out another Hack in Black piece of shit dimocrap scum activist masquerading as a 'Judge' and tried to get DoJ to turn over privileged GJ testimony so they could track down and intimidate (or worse) the opposition.

Fortunately, a real Judge slapped the ***** down. But they won't quite trying.

dimocraps are scum. ESPECIALLY the voters

No bias and hatred here , just like trump. Stupid.

 

[rightwinger]

I don't know , was it a trump judge ? This doesn't make sense. Even Bondi is wishy washy for trump now.

Blondie knows she has no case

Just prosecuting on the demands of Trump

 

[Independent thinker]

This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."

Legal expert sees no viable case against James Comey after Trump DOJ indictment

The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey "seems to be premised on something that's not true," Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy cautions.

www.foxbusiness.com

So? They had no viable cases against Trump but prosecuted him anyway.

 

[0311]

Yup. The deep state protects their own. We all know that now. DC is, and has been for years now, a corrupt system that enriches itself at the expense of the American taxpayer.

There is no "Deep State", just MAGA MAGGOTS who are dead from the neck up stupid enough to believe his thousands of lies.

 

[0311]

Bleach Bondi's only real qualification s for A.G. are her boobs. She is only in office to do 47;s bidding.

For the crap that 47 accused Mr. Biden of "Weaponizing the DOJ", that is exactly what 47 id doing now. He iis using the DOJ as his personal law firm. The cases former Director Comey and A.G.. James are nothing more than vindictive prosecutions.

 

[Delldude]

Blondie knows she has no case

Just prosecuting on the demands of Trump

Debatable. I foresaw a Subway acquittal.

 

[Stann]

Blondie knows she has no case

Just prosecuting on the demands of Trump

But if course , another zombie following the whims of the madman charge.

 

[rightwinger]

Bleach Bondi's only real qualification s for A.G. are her boobs. She is only in office to do 47;s bidding.

For the crap that 47 accused Mr. Biden of "Weaponizing the DOJ", that is exactly what 47 id doing now. He iis using the DOJ as his personal law firm. The cases former Director Comey and A.G.. James are nothing more than vindictive prosecutions.

Biden knew enough to stay out of it and let special prosecutors do their job.

Trump learned from his first term to only appoint an AG that will do his personal business and meet his demands.

 

[Delldude]

Biden knew enough to stay out of it and let special prosecutors do their job.

Trump learned from his first term to only appoint an AG that will do his personal business and meet his demands.

They all do.

Plausible deniability.

 

[rightwinger]

They all do.

Plausible deniability.

Not Trump

He never learned to keep his mouth shut and doesn’t realize that Presidential interference can invalidate a prosecution

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So? They had no viable cases against Trump but prosecuted him anyway.

Lie.

 

[Stann]

Not Trump

He never learned to keep his mouth shut and doesn’t realize that Presidential interference can invalidate a prosecution

Most people see right through trump . He actually must believe he can get away with the things he falsely accuses others of doing. This is unbridled stupidly.

 

[Stann]

Not Trump

He never learned to keep his mouth shut and doesn’t realize that Presidential interference can invalidate a prosecution

Andin the end his mouth will be his final undoing ( well underway ).

 

[rightwinger]

Most people see right through trump . He actually must believe he can get away with the things he falsely accuses others of doing. This is unbridled stupidly.

He believes that because he always does get away with it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He believes that because he always does get away with it.

And always has.

Fraud is his business model.

 

[Stann]

He believes that because he always does get away with it.

I believe that would be better put this way , ........" He believes that because he always GOT away with it in the past. " Even republicans say this a bad move on his part. The gig is up !

 

[0311]

Senate May Pass Epstein Bill Today.​

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/11/18/congress/senate-pass-epstein-thune-00657429

For the latest, read Senate approves Epstein files bill, sending it to Trump’s desk.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he expects the Senate will pass the bill to release DOJ files on the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as soon as Tuesday, a move that would send it to President Donald Trump for his signature.

This bill will likely pass with 60 Vote-Majority, meaning Trump may to veto this bill, but fail. Enough Republicans are fed up with his antics and his lies.

 

[Lesh]

The worm seems to be turning