FOX Begging For Mercy....

Blah, blah, yap, yap.
An ^ accurate summary of your posting history.
FOX settled for the "expected value". A near total capitulation.
As with all settlements, it involved calculations of risk vs reward. Obviously, the lawyers and Fox News management assessed the risks as being too high. So, they chose not to fight. The Parties agreement as to damages reflects a compromise by both sides.
The sum had to be disclosed, and FOX was obliged to acknowledge that their statements were false.
The sum was disclosed. And Fox News still hasn’t acknowledged that their statements were false. You seem incapable of reading with discernment or actual comprehension.
The only thing they were spared was an admission.
Just as they didn’t “acknowledge,” they didn’t “admit.”
 
Dominion got 10 times is current value in settlement with Fox. And these turd polishers are still desperately trying to spin this as a loss for Dominion.

You can't fix stupid.
And that eunuch has the phantom peas to try to bluff his way out of his abject humiliation.

He may be trained, but he's so credulous that he buys the crap FOX sells him.
 
And that eunuch has the phantom peas to try to bluff his way out of his abject humiliation.

He may be trained, but he's so credulous that he buys the crap FOX sells him.

Trained? Nah. His 'legal arguments' are trying to present his opinions as legal facts. Its generic AF. ANd as his spectacular failure in predicting the legal outcome in this case demonstrates elegantly....doesn't amount to much.

As shockingly, no one in actual court of law cares that some random guy on the internet has an opinion about something.
 
An ^ accurate summary of your posting history.

As with all settlements, it involved calculations of risk vs reward. Obviously, the lawyers and Fox News management assessed the risks as being too high. So, they chose not to fight. The Parties agreement as to damages reflects a compromise by both sides.

The sum was disclosed. And Fox News still hasn’t acknowledged that their statements were false. You seem incapable of reading with discernment or actual comprehension.

Just as they didn’t “acknowledge,” they didn’t “admit.”
As with all settlements, it involved calculations of risk vs reward

In order to perform such a calculation you must understand what's actually at risk.

You showed that you had no idea.



The sun was disclosed

Not that this will make you stop laboring typos....


And Fox News still hasn’t acknowledged that their statements were false.

"We acknowledge the Court's rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false.

Parse this for us, Shitty Undergraduate Institution
 
In order to perform such a calculation you must understand what's actually at risk.

You showed that you had no idea.
False. We all knew what was at risk, you idiot. Even a simpleton such as you could see that much.
Not that this will make you stop laboring typos....
Laboring? Did you mean “belaboring?” :itsok:
"We acknowledge the Court's rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false.

See? You truly don’t comprehend the meaning or words or sentence. Your misinterpretation is crystal clear. Being the imbecile that you are, you think acknowledging that the court made a ruling constitutes an acknowledgement that the courts ruling was “correct.”

Your obvious ignorance is on full display.
Parse this for us,
I just did, Horseshit. But, since you’re obviously retarded, you still won’t get it.
 
Prove your assertions that I am a racist, a groomer, an Anti-Semite.

Well, good poster lantern, we need start from the Go Line.
Which means ----- you gotta show any such assertions by my poor avatar.

  • An assertion you are a racist.
  • An assertion you are a groomer.
  • An assertion you are an Anti-Semite.
Show us these "assertions" you think my avatar made.
Personally, and speaking for him ........he doesn't believe he posted that which you claim.
But as always, am open to persuasion.



PS....and just for a fun little amusement for the forum and as long as you now need to 'prove' stuff, well, let see how you would imagine how you would prove you are not any of those things --- a racist, a groomer, an Anti-Semite.
Should be interesting and informative to read your explanations on why you think you are not.
No?
 
False. We all knew what was at risk, you idiot. Even a simpleton such as you could see that much.

Laboring? Did you mean “belaboring?” :itsok:


See? You truly don’t comprehend the meaning or words or sentence. Your misinterpretation is crystal clear. Being the imbecile that you are, you think acknowledging that the court made a ruling constitutes an acknowledgement that the courts ruling was “correct.”

Your obvious ignorance is on full display.

I just did, Horseshit. But, since you’re obviously retarded, you still won’t get it.
False. We all knew what was at risk,

Clearly not.

I said FOX was "begging for mercy"....you brayed something stupid at it....a few hours before FOX settled....for 787 million.

About 1.6 billion discounted at 9%, for 8 years.


you think acknowledging that the court made a ruling constitutes an acknowledgement that the courts ruling was “correct

Pretty much.
 
Well, good poster lantern, we need start from the Go Line.
Which means ----- you gotta show any such assertions by my poor avatar.

  • An assertion you are a racist.
  • An assertion you are a groomer.
  • An assertion you are an Anti-Semite.
Show us these "assertions" you think my avatar made.
Personally, and speaking for him ........he doesn't believe he posted that which you claim.
But as always, am open to persuasion.



PS....and just for a fun little amusement for the forum and as long as you now need to 'prove' stuff, well, let see how you would imagine how you would prove you are not any of those things --- a racist, a groomer, an Anti-Semite.
Should be interesting and informative to read your explanations on why you think you are not.
No?
Yawn. So you can’t prove any of your bullshit. As usual. And pathetically attempting to deflect and make me prove your assertions? Just sad. Show. Or. Go. Get to work.
 
When they wanted $1.6 billion and gave up for less than half that? Shows that they weren’t very confident. Otherwise they would have rejected that and gone to trial.
Fox did not have to pay. Why didn't Fox take it to trial? Were they not confident?
 
Fox did not have to pay. Why didn't Fox take it to trial? Were they not confident?
They didn’t take less than half of what they wanted. Dominion did. Seems THEY were not confident of victory. You can stop now. And remember Sandmann beat CNN.
 
We saw intentionally crafted "fake News" designed to undermine the Trump administration in what can only be considered to be treason but that didn't seem to bother the left. "The end justifies the means". Meanwhile Fox failed to verify a news story and was sued. The left thought (hoped) that the law suit would be the end of Fox and left wing propaganda would reign but it didn't happen. Fox settled and desperate lefties try to glean any propaganda they can scrape up. What a pitiful bunch.
 
We saw intentionally crafted "fake News" designed to undermine the Trump administration in what can only be considered to be treason but that didn't seem to bother the left. "The end justifies the means". Meanwhile Fox failed to verify a news story and was sued. The left thought (hoped) that the law suit would be the end of Fox and left wing propaganda would reign but it didn't happen. Fox settled and desperate lefties try to glean any propaganda they can scrape up. What a pitiful bunch.
To what intentionally crafted fake news do you refer that rose to the level of treason?
 
Dominion has no future income. They’ve been banned from several states for the exact allegations (that were proven and echoed by Dems not that long ago, funny how they didn’t care then) that Fox exposed. They were never going to see that much future income.

Funny how the turd now comes home to roost, especially when it is a fake toy balloon bear turd. Skylar

First the fake election that everyone knows about, and now the noose tightens on the Hunter investigation and prosecution that Biden's political operatives have been trying to suppress for years.

Oops! Plop plop, fizz, fizz.
 
What is incorrect? Dominion had to settle for less than half of what they wanted. Yet you peons claim they won something.

Laughing.....it was the largest public defamation settlement in the history of our country. A settlement worth 10 times Dominion's value as a company. With Fox having to admit they lied. And the judge finding that Fox's claims regarding Dominion were false.

And you're trying to spin this as a loss for Dominion?

You can't fix stupid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top