No it is not relevant if the do not find any obvious signs of rape. It's only relevant if the doctor finds injuries.It's not relevant to the case.Probably wasn't raped. Probably?
It doesn't matter if the doctor said "probably". How is a doctor's conclusion withheld from a trial?
A doctor's examination isn't relevant to a rape case? I guess the alleged victim says she's raped, and the doctor says, "Sounds legit." That's medical jargon, by the way.
It's relevant either way, to corroborate or dispute the allegation.
This is Captain Obvious stuff right here.