Zone1 Force Doctrine?

[candycorn]

Modern feminism seeks to dismantle patriarchal structures, but it’s a catch 22 because women cannot dismantle them without appealing to the patriarchy, and men, for the force necessary.

Really? Quite the victim complex there considering you didn’t build them either.

Which structure are you talking about?

 

[sartre play]

Nobody as forced me to do anything since I was about 10 years old.

Men are mentioned in the OP.

Since there is no childish stuff, it shouldn't be that hard.

There is a new category of angry men called INCEL shooters. When they don't have any other way to influence an outcome, they start shooting.


Stating that rights are guarnteed by force and not law is simply wrong. The Constitution gives you enumerated rights...not force.

If you haven't read the constitution, just say so. It seems you haven't.

Funny thing, some where in the 70s the law just started saying its MAYBE not ok to beat your wife!

 

[Stryder50]

So a female cop, judge, crossing guard, can’t force someone like you to be compliant?

I think you’re wrong.

The way I've read what he's been saying is that the "female cop, judge, crossing guard,"etc. get authority to use force from males, and have males backing them up when the female isn't capable enough.

Classic example my older son mentioned to me comes from basic combat training in the U.S. Army. Since he enlisted in Reserves, in a 'Chemical Warfare ' and since such isn't considered "direct" Combat Arms (Infantry, Artillery, Armor) females were allowed to enlist in that branch, and train alongside males. There were separate barracks for female and male, but when training in the field, overnight, they are camping together as a unit and on their own not to fraternize.

One combat training drill is for each soldier, wearing full 'battle rattle', to dash out onto the middle of an open road, where they would be under enemy fire, grab a wounded comrade by his gear harness, then drag him back to cover on the friendly side of the lines.

Most of the guys in his platoon could do this drill, but none of the females could. It took two females to grab and drag the "wounded" trooper out of exposed cover, across the road to friendly side.

Down side of this, is that in real life, the soldier sent out to grab the companion could also get shoot and now you have to WIA(KIA) to retrieve. When it's two females doing this the chances are both might be shot and now you might have three troopers down.

There's a list of other (they ain't equal in ability) examples I could cite.
One common is in firefighter training and most females are not physically strong enough to carry out an adult victim on their own.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Really? Quite the victim complex there considering you didn’t build them either.

You keep making it personally about one person, me. I'm talking about men as a monolith, and their duties, abilities, and the manifestation of their physical and behavioral psychological characteristics.

I don't walk around thinking I'm some Brama Bull... I'm a normal guy, and I admire men who are better than me.

Which structure are you talking about?

It would be structure(s), as in any system where men hold the primary power and leadership roles (even if it makes complete sense that they do). This includes:

• The traditional nuclear family
• Heirarchal-based systems, such as our current government, current business/corporate structure (aka the never-ending glass ceiling claim)
• Christianity, among other religions
• Police forces and military forces
• Competitive sports

The list goes on. That's why feminism runs very close in hand with socialist/communist policies and movements. They seek to take down all the systems we have that are dominated by men.. and men dominate most systems in our society (for specific evolutionary psychological reasons, not sexism)

 

[Mr. Friscus]

So a female cop, judge, crossing guard, can’t force someone like you to be compliant?

I think you’re wrong.

Stryder50 was on to what I'm saying.

That cop, judge, or crossing guard:
1. Wouldn't be able to force the monolith of men to comply without the use of force from other men
2. An entire female police force would be completely overpowered and dominated by men who broke the law. They women wouldn't be able to enforce the laws, because men would just not only overpower them physically, but also be more aggressive in thinking, strategy, reaction time, etc. Men would coordinate to take down the all-female police force institution, and they'd succeed rather easily. All female police stations would be bombarded, taken down, and replaced with male police forces.
3. A female judge uses male force to enforce her ruling. There are occasional female police officers, but they can only exist when surrounded my males, and also many can only exist because standards have been dropped so that they can even join the force.

No matter which woman you point to as far as any authority, they can only impose that authority through the force of men. You'll never get around that fact, and that's my point all along.

Thus, you'd think there would be some appreciation of the benevolence of men in the west for not treating women like Iran does. Western Patriarchal structures are good for society. However, modern feminism seems to hate and oppose Conservative men more than Iranian muslim men (who have made sure women have NO rights). Basically, the modern American woman needs a reality check, and needs to drop the feminist posturing and realize their movement only exists because men allow it to. That's not my interjecting myself, that's the monolith of the sexes.