Zone1 Force Doctrine?

[Stryder50]

If men and women are equal, why have males been the dominant sex virtually throughout history? Here, geneticist Moir and BBC- TV writer-producer Jessel argue convincingly that the answer lies in the difference between the male and female brain. Writing with clarity and style, and documenting their data every step of the way, Moir and Jessel explain how the embryonic brain is shaped as either male or female at about six weeks, when the male fetus begins producing hormones that organize its brain's neural networks into a male pattern; in their absence, the brain will be female.

Not surprisingly, there are endless variations in degree of maleness, and mishaps can lead to a male brain in a female body and vice versa. Moir and Jessel include a brain sex test that lets the reader discover just how masculine or feminine his (or her) brain is. For the nonscientist, they translate considerable research into the structural and organizational differences between male and female brains, demonstrating how these differences make men more aggressive and competitive and better at skills that require spatial ability and mathematical reasoning, and women more sensitive to nuances of expression and gesture, more adept at judging character.

Women, it seems, are more people-oriented than men, who are more interested in things. Moir and Jessel assert that it is necessary to ``accept who we are before arguing about what we should be,'' and that denying gender differences means ignoring their value. A literate, entertaining, and, for some, surely wrath- provoking presentation of scientific data about the differences between the sexes. -- Copyright ©1991, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.


https://www.amazon.com/Brain-Sex-Difference-Between-Women/dp/0818405430?tag=usmb-20

 

[Mr. Friscus]

If men and women are equal, why have males been the dominant sex virtually throughout history? Here, geneticist Moir and BBC- TV writer-producer Jessel argue convincingly that the answer lies in the difference between the male and female brain. Writing with clarity and style, and documenting their data every step of the way, Moir and Jessel explain how the embryonic brain is shaped as either male or female at about six weeks, when the male fetus begins producing hormones that organize its brain's neural networks into a male pattern; in their absence, the brain will be female.

Not surprisingly, there are endless variations in degree of maleness, and mishaps can lead to a male brain in a female body and vice versa. Moir and Jessel include a brain sex test that lets the reader discover just how masculine or feminine his (or her) brain is. For the nonscientist, they translate considerable research into the structural and organizational differences between male and female brains, demonstrating how these differences make men more aggressive and competitive and better at skills that require spatial ability and mathematical reasoning, and women more sensitive to nuances of expression and gesture, more adept at judging character.

Women, it seems, are more people-oriented than men, who are more interested in things. Moir and Jessel assert that it is necessary to ``accept who we are before arguing about what we should be,'' and that denying gender differences means ignoring their value. A literate, entertaining, and, for some, surely wrath- provoking presentation of scientific data about the differences between the sexes. -- Copyright ©1991, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.


https://www.amazon.com/Brain-Sex-Difference-Between-Women/dp/0818405430?tag=usmb-20

It looks like an interesting read, and outlines scientific facts we already know in psychology. There's just an activist movement in psychology to suppress and ignore this verified data and studies in the name of a new religious ideology of trans/non-binary identification or that men and women are interchangeable directly, and have no internal wiring that causes their differences.

These people have turned psychology into something I don't even really consider a science anymore. It's all just ideological unproven claims.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

That much is true.

Its the classic paradox of swearing your “manly” but part of being a man isn’t always complaining about how an entire gender is somehow a problem because they don’t give you the time of day. Clearly many conservative males have issues with women. From the standpoint of women, they are probably the most dangerous types because their whole identity of strength is a facade

Nobody is claiming to be "manly"... I'd say that's some insecurity on your side.

The initial claim is that men have a monopoly on force, and the only way women can achieve rights is to appease to men to fight on their behalf. Women cannot fight their way and attain rights on their own.

It's an important distinction due to the leftist social climate that promotes women as being self-built and sh*ts on men non-stop... like a 16 year old princess who sh*ts on her parents for not getting her the convertible rather than the standard.

But again, women cannot build themselves and attain their own rights. They have to appeal to the benevolence of men. That takes some humility, something our society doesn't much teach modern women these days.

 

[candycorn]

Nobody is claiming to be "manly"... I'd say that's some insecurity on your side.

The initial claim is that men have a monopoly on force, and the only way women can achieve rights is to appease to men to fight on their behalf. Women cannot fight their way and attain rights on their own.

But again, women cannot build themselves and attain their own rights. They have to appeal to the benevolence of men. That takes some humility, something our society doesn't much teach modern women these days.

Thanks for proving my point about danger. If you don't get your way...then what? You use force...right?

It's an important distinction due to the leftist social climate that promotes women as being self-built and sh*ts on men non-stop... like a 16 year old princess who sh*ts on her parents for not getting her the convertible rather than the standard.

More "I'm a victim" nonsense. This is at the core of every post you make. Nobody is shitting on you. What your mindset does is create the entitled INCEL shooter category.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/10887679221106975

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Thanks for proving my point about danger. If you don't get your way...then what? You use force...right?

Anyone uses force to enforce anything, such as the rights and rules in government.

I never mentioned or addressed any danger, I don’t see how it’s relative to the topic.

shooter category.

You make everything personal. It’s not about me, it’s about men.. and why get so triggered and emotional that you have to lash out with mere insults? LOL. I’ll just ignore the childish stuff.

And I don’t know where “shooter” comes in. I’m talking about the enforcement of rights. Are you capable of a discussion about it? If you can’t keep yourself calm and on topic, just say so.

 

[candycorn]

Anyone uses force to enforce anything, such as the rights and rules in government.
I never mentioned or addressed any danger, I don’t see how it’s relative to the topic.

Nobody as forced me to do anything since I was about 10 years old.

You make everything personal. It’s not about me, it’s about men..

Men are mentioned in the OP.

and why get so triggered and emotional that you have to lash out with mere insults? LOL. I’ll just ignore the childish stuff.

Since there is no childish stuff, it shouldn't be that hard.

And I don’t know where “shooter” comes in.

There is a new category of angry men called INCEL shooters. When they don't have any other way to influence an outcome, they start shooting.

I’m talking about the enforcement of rights. Are you capable of a discussion about it? If you can’t keep yourself calm and on topic, just say so.

Stating that rights are guarnteed by force and not law is simply wrong. The Constitution gives you enumerated rights...not force.

If you haven't read the constitution, just say so. It seems you haven't.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Nobody as forced me to do anything since I was about 10 years old.

I think you’re misunderstanding the use of the term force, which I’ll address next

Stating that rights are guarnteed by force and not law is simply wrong. The Constitution gives you enumerated rights...not force.

Yes, we have made up rights for our country.. And how are those rights enforced?

 

[Hafar1014]

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Hey now, don’t trigger the woke folk on here.. they might call you names.

 

[candycorn]

I think you’re misunderstanding the use of the term force, which I’ll address next

Yes, we have made up rights for our country.. And how are those rights enforced?

No, they’re actual rights.

Enforced By penalties and fines. Seldom is force involved.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

No, they’re actual rights.

And how are rights enforced?

Enforced By penalties and fines. Seldom is force involved.

Okay, but if the person refuses to pay fines or serve penalties, what happens?

They are punished. How? Force!

 

[Stryder50]

It looks like an interesting read, and outlines scientific facts we already know in psychology. There's just an activist movement in psychology to suppress and ignore this verified data and studies in the name of a new religious ideology of trans/non-binary identification or that men and women are interchangeable directly, and have no internal wiring that causes their differences.

These people have turned psychology into something I don't even really consider a science anymore. It's all just ideological unproven claims.

One main point which underscores this book, and something I've encountered other sources, is that fauna (and most flora), almost all carbon biological life starts with a pattern, construction blueprint, that is female.

Males tend to be an alteration of that basic(female) blueprint. Or mutant if you prefer.

The "X" chromosome is the basic DNA guidebook, and also known as the female gene. The core of the egg coming out of the ovaries.

The "Y" chromosome, often referred to as the male gene, basically presents the changes or alterations for the corresponding sections it matches with on the female "X". Most notable the instructions that change a vagina into a penis, and related 'plumbing'.
Interactions of hormones with the X or Y then alter other parts of the developing body, most notable being the brain. There are physical difference in male brains compared to female brains, which drive the differences between the sexes, especially mentally and emotionally.

Note that this applies not just to humans, but in various ways to other animals, and plants.

The book goes into the details. It's packed with information for such a small volume.

Excuse this sidestep, I'll address the main focus of your post at a later time.

 

[candycorn]

And how are rights enforced?

Okay, but if the person refuses to pay fines or serve penalties, what happens?

They are punished. How? Force!

Oh brother.

So getting back to your gender based premise...are men immune from such “force”

 

[Stryder50]

Having "lots" if kids is not needed. What is wrong with having one kid? Thats plenty.

Are you a single child ?
Or do you have siblings ?

Most single child persons I've know wish they'd had siblings to grow up with and interact with in the family unit. With two or more this is a balance of sorts and unity in mutual aid dealing with growing up.

 

[Stryder50]

Left out the killing spiders and bugs that are in the house ~ bathtub etc.
A few others as well.

 

[Stryder50]

If any of that is true, then explain why she chews on my ass every time I don't put the lid down or leave my underwear on the floor.

Because she can get away with it ?
You let her get away with it ?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

If any of that is true, then explain why she chews on my ass every time I don't put the lid down or leave my underwear on the floor.

Because you're WILLING to put up with the bitching and nagging for relative "peace"

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Left out the killing spiders and bugs that are in the house ~ bathtub etc.
A few others as well.

Or building EVERYTHING women use.
Apartments, houses don't build themselves, and women don't build them

 

[Mr. Friscus]

So getting back to your gender based premise...are men immune from such “force”

No, but effective applicable force can only be produced by men, and a patriarchal system. Men apply force on other men all the time. However, If women want to fight for things, they must appeal to men’s use of force on their behalf to get it, despite what the feminist bumper stickers, Twitter posts, and T-shirts claim.

Modern feminism seeks to dismantle patriarchal structures, but it’s a catch 22 because women cannot dismantle them without appealing to the patriarchy, and men, for the force necessary.

 

[candycorn]

No, but effective applicable force can only be produced by men, and a patriarchal system. Men apply force on other men all the time. However, If women want to fight for things, they must appeal to men’s use of force on their behalf to get it, despite what the feminist bumper stickers, Twitter posts, and T-shirts claim.

Modern feminism seeks to dismantle patriarchal structures, but it’s a catch 22 because women cannot dismantle them without appealing to the patriarchy, and men, for the force necessary.

So a female cop, judge, crossing guard, can’t force someone like you to be compliant?

I think you’re wrong.