For the record: He never said it and he never will.

NOPE! Nothing was destroyed.

how would meet the press know if they did or didn't destroy evidence? If it's destroyed, how would they find it?
 
BTW, the rebels in Syria have shown demofks what a true insurrection looks like.
Actually, the citizens of Brazil have shown traitorous Repubs how to treat an insurrectionist.

 
I swear, do they pay attention to ANYTHING?

Did they not know he said that, or do they not know what "retribution" means?
so where's the video? Amazing how sure you always are yet can't ever polish the receipt to show us. fking cuck loser.
 
BTW, the rebels in Syria have shown demofks what a true insurrection looks like.
Not to democrats. Democrats will blubber "yes the Syrian rebels killed people, but MAGA called me by the wrong PRONOUNS".

Syria has been taken over by terrorists. Which is just what degenerate democrats wanted all along. Watch, those fucking degenerate leftists will have plane loads of Syrians landing at every airport in the US.
 
so where's the video? Amazing how sure you always are yet can't ever polish the receipt to show us. fking cuck loser.
Um, look at post 5, Einstein.

Holy shit, you people are hopeless. You want so desperately to be considered intelligent, but you're just... hopeless.
 
Not to democrats. Democrats will blubber "yes the Syrian rebels killed people, but MAGA called me by the wrong PRONOUNS".

Syria has been taken over by terrorists. Which is just what degenerate democrats wanted all along. Watch, those fucking degenerate leftists will have plane loads of Syrians landing at every airport in the US.
true, but if jan 6 was intended for the same thing, it's what it would have actually looked like.
 
Um, look at post 5, Einstein.

Holy shit, you people are hopeless. You want so desperately to be considered intelligent, but you're just... hopeless.
why would I have necessarily read post 5 einstein? If I responded to the OP and someone then responds to me, takes my post off page 1 and others come in similar time sequence, I wouldn't have read Post 5. cuck loser. You should learn how the threads work and where a post goes after it's posted.
 
Not a peep of what the crimes allegedly are, just the non thinking, parroting what their Simon Says, says....to stay in the game, is what it looks like....?
Perjury - especially to FISA
Subornation of perjury
Obstruction
Malicious prosecution
Violation of 4th and 5th Amendment rights
Destruction of evidence
Leaking of privileged information
FARA violations
Bribery
Espionage
Criminal insubordination
Conspiracy
Sedition
Treason

Just off the top of my head...
 
Now that you've been shown that he did say it, what's next?
All I have been shown are edited clips and leftwing nutjobs claiming he is saying what those with intellectual honesty know he hasn't said and is not saying.

Do you have any clue what 'in context' means. What unedited video, audio is?

Did you even read the OP?

This was in June:

And this was on "Meet the Press" last Sunday:

". . .Trump — referring to members of the House panel who were probing his actions during the Jan. 6, 2021, rioting on Capitol Hill — told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” in the pretaped interview, “For what they did, honestly they should go to jail.”

But when asked if he’d direct his US attorney general and FBI director to go after them, he replied, “No, not at all.

“I think [the two law-enforcement agencies will] have to look at that. But I’m not going to [ask]. I’m going to focus on drill baby drill,” the prez-elect said, referring to efforts to expand US oil and gas production. . ."


]
 
Last edited:
Not yet...What crime did he commit, not liking Trump?
House Republicans released a report claiming the Jan. 6 select committee "deleted" records and hired "Hollywood producers" to promote a political narrative while investigating the circumstances surrounding supporters of former President Donald Trump breaching the Capitol in 2021.

"For nearly two years, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi's January 6th Select Committee promoted hearsay and cherry-picked information to promote its political goal – to legislatively prosecute former President Donald Trump," Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., chairman of the Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight, said in a statement accompanied by his "Initial Findings Report" on Monday.

"It was no surprise that the Select Committee’s final report focused primarily on former President Trump and his supporters, not the security failures and reforms needed to ensure the United States Capitol is safer today than in 2021."'


Loudermilk's oversight subcommittee of the House Administration Committee released an 81-page report Monday that investigated "the security failures of January 6th which House Democrats failed to investigate in the 117th Congress."
 
I disagree on that....

Presidential Candidates don't say they are running on the arrest and retribution of their political enemies.

That is all on Trump...IT is NOT acceptable or normal play.

The overwhelming majority clearly disagrees with you.
See election day.
Sucks to be you.
 
As predicted.
those who were wronged don't deserve their retribution to those who did them wrong? Wow. I didn't hear Trump say he himself was looking for retribution however, he only stated for those who were wronged I am your justice, I am your retribution. Never said he was looking for retribution. I get how semantics can make it seem like he said what you think he said, but he didn't say what the OP asked.
 
Last edited:
those who were wronged don't deserve their retribution to those who did them wrong? Wow. I didn't hear Trump say he himself was looking for retribution however, he only stated for those who were wronged I am your retribution. Never said he was looking for retribution. I get how semantics can make it seem like he said what you think he said, but he didn't say what the OP asked.

Mac knows
Mac is just a pos.
 
Back
Top Bottom