g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 140,664
- 101,041
- 3,605
Once again your propagandists are keeping you in the dark!I did not expect that but from a man (you) who knows that room very well, did you see him there?
Sad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once again your propagandists are keeping you in the dark!I did not expect that but from a man (you) who knows that room very well, did you see him there?
I am dedicated to stopping you from doing that.Once again your propagandists are keeping you in the dark!
Sad.
I don't have much good to say about any random low information, low quality YouTubers who claim to be "independent journalists".If she did this about Trump, you would love her.
I have reviewed a lot of your posts and find you are not objective.I don't have much good to say about any random low information, low quality YouTubers who claim to be "independent journalists".
I'm sure there's some of them on the left, but I haven't really heard of any. There sure seem to be a lot of them on the right, and they're pretty lame.
Calling her a journalist would be far too kind, anyway. She's hardly objective.
Well, I never claimed to be.I have reviewed a lot of your posts and find you are not objective.
I congratulate you for watching all of the video. I can easily deal with argumentative posters, and you are one of those. I did not post the video to be drilled down into, if you wanted more information, see YouTube and ask her yourself. But you drilled me.Well, I never claimed to be.
The video you posted is really lame. She talks to basically no one, finds out basically nothing, and bizarrely focuses on this restaurant for the majority of the video.
At the end of the video, she goes to the main site of Project Hope and is told people are operating there Monday through Friday and has to admit she has no idea if they're a legitimate nonprofit or not.
What a waste of time.
If you aren’t prepared to discuss the topic, I don’t think it was wise to start a thread on it.I congratulate you for watching all of the video. I can easily deal with argumentative posters, and you are one of those. I did not post the video to be drilled down into, if you wanted more information, see YouTube and ask her yourself. But you drilled me.
Now you are acting like you did as I asked from the top, you watched the video. I congratulated you for watching it. I however did discuss the video, and you know for a fact I did. I know the stairs you mention. Did that seem a location for an addict office to you?If you aren’t prepared to discuss the topic, I don’t think it was wise to start a thread on it.
This video was a waste of time and this woman is not very smart.
She even noted the stairwell for half a second. Did she not think that there’s offices on the second floor?
The stairwell! Of course not. There’s obviously a second floor that has room for offices. She didn’t go up there and never even considered the possibility that such a space would exist above the restaurant.Now you are acting like you did as I asked from the top, you watched the video. I congratulated you for watching it. I however did discuss the video, and you know for a fact I did. I know the stairs you mention. Did that seem a location for an addict office to you?
I believe upstairs was included in the restaurant lease. Where she (Omar) claimed she had the addict office.The stairwell! Of course not. There’s obviously a second floor that has room for offices. She didn’t go up there and never even considered the possibility that such a space would exist above the restaurant.
That doesn’t seem very intelligent. Does it?
Why would you believe that about the lease? Obviously you never saw it and know nothing of it.I believe upstairs was included in the restaurant lease. Where she (Omar) claimed she had the addict office.
Because I have leased commercial property, from garages, to offices to restaurants.Why would you believe that about the lease? Obviously you never saw it and know nothing of it.
Omar doesn’t have an addict office.
Bullshitting would imply she knows it’s false. I think she most likely believes this stuff.Because I have leased commercial property, from garages, to offices to restaurants.
Would you want to operate a restaurant and have drug addicts walk through the customer area? Right, you got it, she has no addict office. She lied.
That girl did not show up just to make a video; she went there due to claims made by Omar.
Angela lives in Colorado and do you truly believe she flew to Minnesota to engage in bullshitting?
What is the basis of the allegations of her being involved with "the fraud" in Minnesota?
Is it a red flag? It’s a business valuation that has nothing to do with Minnesota.The sudden increase of wealth is a red flag, especially with all of the fraud that has been uncovered in her district.
Ever the defender you appear to be. I kinda knew when I asked the question, you wouldn’t ever be in favor of an investigation into her, you’d deflect and defend her, but you don’t give any republican that benefit of the doubt.
Is it a red flag? It’s a business valuation that has nothing to do with Minnesota.
It wasn’t anything liquid or any wealth that was actually realized. It wasn’t even intentional.
Trump was caught falsifying his disclosure forms. Kushner famously had to revise his security clearance forms. Clarence Thomas “forgot” to disclose lot of income from his wife through advocacy groups.That’s Omar covering her tracks, as she had amended her financial disclosure forms…yet another red flag that needs to be investigated.
Seriously, if any republican had done these exact things, would you be defending them?
He supposedly ran a winery that was supposedly worth millions but nobody seems to be able to find where this alleged winery is located nor buy any wine from said winery.Valuations for some businesses is pretty straight forward when they’re simple things.
For other businesses, it’s total guesswork.
If I had to guess, her husbands business is the latter and value didn’t exist anywhere but on paper.
It’s meaningless.
The winery was some years ago and doesn't seem to have been terribly successful. He lists a few thousand in income from the business in the last year. They did produce some wine. You can see some reviews of them.He supposedly ran a winery that was supposedly worth millions but nobody seems to be able to find where this alleged winery is located nor buy any wine from said winery.
He also supposedly ran an investment firm but that doesn't appear to have offices even though it claims to have gone from zero to 60 billion in assets under management.
Care to explain why it's so hard to put "valuations" on businesses that are obvious scams, Marener?
www.beverlycrandon.com