YOU are incorrect. first you do not know me.
She participated and helped lead the most dishonest, corrupt, malicious congressional effort in history specifically intended to take out a political opponent who was libeled, slandered, and denied due process. That should not go unpunished.
Show the video or audio in FULL CONTEXT or you're lying.
That's because it is not menacing. Retribution is not revenge in the context Trump has used it. It is showing the world how bad the Biden Administration has been, how evil and corrupt those who have weaponized government against him are, through showing the American people and the world how it is supposed to be done, getting actual good results, succeeding, winning.He did say this, but it doesn't really sound menacing.
Trump talks Day One pardon for J6ers, says of Biden payback: ‘Retribution will be through success’
Trump talks Day One pardon for J6ers, says of Biden payback: ‘Retribution will be through success’
President-elect Donald Trump said in an interview with NBC News’ Kristen Welker that one of the first things he does on Day One as the nation’s 47th […]www.bizpacreview.com
.
I hear they will be investigated. But where is any mention of revenge or intention to take revenge? That they will go to jail. That they will receive retribution? Certainly deep state operative who have misused their power/authority and participated in illegal and malicious warfare should have that looked at. Don't you agree?
She said very plainly that the "bad prosecutors" will be prosecuted. Pending the investigations, and the pardons I suppose.
Do you think bad prosecutors should not be investigated?
That depends on if they really are bad, or just being lied about.
"Well revenge does take time. I will say that, and sometimes revenge can be justified," Trump said in the interview that aired Thursday night.
I don't disagree with anything he said. What is it you took from that? He mereley spoke a truth. Isn't it true what he said?
Trump talked about getting even
Well, if they're being lied about they should welcome an honest investigation to clear their names. Again, Pam Bondi's record is squeaky clean when it comes to professional conduct. She will not do malicious prosecution as Garland has done.
Again that is an expressed opinion and not a statement of intention or policy. Context is everything and those who are intellectually honest know the difference between an expressed opinion and a statement of intention or policy.
Except you claimed Trump never said it
Merrick will get a presidential pardon for his malicious prosecutions. What then?
I suggest you read the OP again. And if you still don't understand what I said he never said, I suggest you join many others in a good remedial reading comprehension course.
Then I hope the reforms planned by Trump and his team will make it far more difficult for a corrupt official like Garland to do the intense damage that he has done.
