For the record: He never said it and he never will.

[otto105]

You will have a hard time proving that too. But the OP isn't about that.

Ask rudy.

 

[Mac1958]

Kinda blew this thread up

This is all about rage and revenge. For him, and for them.

He fears and attacks people they've chosen to hate, they validate each other, and that's all that matters.

The rage hasn't faded with time. It seems like it just keeps growing.

 

[Mac1958]

You believe what you want.

An interesting component of this is the way they're so eager to deny the obvious. I'm just not understanding why that is.

They've spent the last four years trying to downplay the Insurrection. They've been denying that they want a strongman type in the drivers seat. Now they're trying to deny that much of this moment is about revenge. I don't get the point. Why do they keep doing this? Are they just conditioned to deny everything out of hand?



Maybe they'll be more forthcoming after he's sworn in. Just say it, and we can go from there. There's no practical reason to deny stuff like this.

If you look through this thread, many of them are perfectly comfortable admitting the revenge angle, yet some aren't and just keep attacking. Fascinating to watch, for sure.

 

[SeaMajor7]

An interesting component of this is the way they're so eager to deny the obvious. I'm just not understanding why that is.

They've spent the last four years trying to downplay the Insurrection. They've been denying that they want a strongman type in the drivers seat. Now they're trying to deny that much of this moment is about revenge. I don't get the point. Why do they keep doing this? Are they just conditioned to deny everything out of hand?



Maybe they'll be more forthcoming after he's sworn in. Just say it, and we can go from there. There's no practical reason to deny stuff like this.

If you look through this thread, many of them are perfectly comfortable admitting the revenge angle, yet some aren't and just keep attacking. Fascinating to watch, for sure.

There was no Insurrection.
Oh wait, that's right! The STOLEN ELECTION of 2020 was The Insurrection.

 

[Oddball]

You can never go by anything they say, YET he is saying some interesting positive things.
That IS WHY a little lets wait and see, Could be better than rolling out the hate.

I'm going by the pattern of history.

BTW, a jihadist has been installed as the head of the Syria, fool.

 

[eagle1462010]

Denial is hilarious fuckup

Its a place in Egypt

 

[Nostra]

An interesting component of this is the way they're so eager to deny the obvious. I'm just not understanding why that is.

They've spent the last four years trying to downplay the Insurrection. They've been denying that they want a strongman type in the drivers seat. Now they're trying to deny that much of this moment is about revenge. I don't get the point. Why do they keep doing this? Are they just conditioned to deny everything out of hand?



Maybe they'll be more forthcoming after he's sworn in. Just say it, and we can go from there. There's no practical reason to deny stuff like this.

If you look through this thread, many of them are perfectly comfortable admitting the revenge angle, yet some aren't and just keep attacking. Fascinating to watch, for sure.

Funny shit coming from a clown whose Vegetable Messiah weaponized his DOJ to try to lock up his political rival.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So far not a single person accusing him and who has posted other people accusing him as 'evidence' which is laughable, after all of Trump's comments, social media posts, interviews, speeches, etc. etc. etc. can produce a single video or audio in context. that says he has ever said he intended to take revenge on anybody.

This not not about Trump's DOJ. It is about Trump.

I would have hoped there would have been at least one honest and honorable person on the left at USMB who at least would acknowledge that. Guess not.

Good night.

Yes, credible evidence has been posted. You want to change the rule of credible evidence. No.

 

[Nostra]

Yes, credible evidence has been posted. You want to change the rule of credible evidence. No.

Nope.

 

[jc456]

Bullshit....you just deny all claims.

they don't match criteria. We don't adjust to make you happy, we expect receipts that match the challenge. Post one, one where Trump says he personally is seeking retribution. none exist, you know it, you post this because you know you ain't got any. drop mic.

 

[jc456]

Yes, credible evidence has been posted. You want to change the rule of credible evidence. No.

which post? Mac's wasn't and I explained now in two posts. so give me another post that shows trump saying he is seeking retribution for himself.

 

[jc456]

He's a fiscal conservative. Where on earth do you people get that anyone who doesn't like Trump must be a leftist? I mean, that is simply illogical.

well..........................................because it's true?

 

[Theowl32]

Several have said as much. Trump, however, has not.

Still, i hope there is a reckoning. I'd be disappointed if there isn't.

 

[jc456]

Still, i hope there is a reckoning. I'd be disappointed if there isn't.

if anyone broke laws, I expect indictments. It's that simple. Why should americans be concerned these people are above the law? Demofks have been screaming that message since 2016. Now they don't like it? so demofk.

 

[Lesh]

So far not a single person accusing him and who has posted other people accusing him as 'evidence' which is laughable, after all of Trump's comments, social media posts, interviews, speeches, etc. etc. etc. can produce a single video or audio in context. that says he has ever said he intended to take revenge on anybody.

This not not about Trump's DOJ. It is about Trump.

I would have hoped there would have been at least one honest and honorable person on the left at USMB who at least would acknowledge that. Guess not.

Good night.

Retribution.. jackass

 

[jc456]

Retribution.. jackass

yep, he has uttered that word, but not for what demofks say he did. It's simply hilarious that your mixed up nerves keep interfering with your ability to use your brain. Why don't you idiots educate yourself on what sentences mean? Please, it would make the experience a bit better for you in here.

 

[Lesh]

yep, he has uttered that word, but not for what demofks say he did. It's simply hilarious that your mixed up nerves keep interfering with your ability to use your brain. Why don't you idiots educate yourself on what sentences mean? Please, it would make the experience a bit better for you in here.

Right

It’s not what Trump says

It’s what his minions claim he means

 

[TimFitz]

Show me the unedited audio or video in context. Out of the hundreds of hours of public commentary, if he said it, it's out there. If you cannot do that admit you just want to believe something that is not true and in fact are lying about it.

Another Trumpster trying to ignore facts by playing the ‘out of context” dodge.

Dishonest, pathetic, and lazy.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Oddball]

Another Trumpster trying to ignore facts by playing the ‘out of context” dodge.

Dishonest, pathetic, and lazy.

Then give us the proper context....Lay out all them there "facts".

C'mon, Corky, dazzle us.