Liability
Locked Account.
- Thread starter
- #161
I think the root of this is what "trying" means.
If by "trying" to silence Rush they're putting out ads against him, that's fine. They have just as much of right to speak out against Rush as he does against them.
If MediaMatters were trying to get a law passed to force Rush off the air, I'd be in the street protesting them.
They are trying to silence him.
But as long as they do it in some circumspect fashion, then it's not unseemly?
They are taking out ads to try to kill the revenue stream that permits him to be aired. Not all that different than getting a tin-horn dictator's approach to passing a law forbidding him from speaking on the air. A different method with the very same agenda.
They are not content to expose the stupidity of what he said in that Fluke story. And some of what he said was, actually, kinda dumb. No. That's not enough for them. They want him silenced.
Way to embrace free speech values. Not.
Was Rush trying to "silence" Sandra Fluke?
No.
But even if he had been trying to "silence" her, is it your contention that the answer is therefore to silence him?
Very modern American liberal of you.