kyzr
Diamond Member
1. There were zero honest elections in Crimea to see which country they preferred to be part of:1. There were several votes and many polls.
Most said around 93% wanted to leave the Ukraine.
Who would not want to leave the Ukraine, an extremely violent and elitist culture?
This is common public knowledge; you should already know.
2. You linked and proved nothing.
3. The ONLY difference between these nuclear ABMs and "city killers" are size, and you totally have it wrong.
First strike weapons are NOT city killers. The point of first strike is to hit retaliatory weapons, which does NOT need city killers. City killers are the retaliatory weapons, holding population centers as hostage.

How Russia Rigged Crimean Referendum
In Sevastopol, the largest city in Crimea, turnout for Sunday's referendum reached an astonishing 123% of registered voters. Clearly, Vladimir Putin isn't even interested in a pretense of legality. His intention is to test Western resolve.

2. My credible links prove what the facts are and disprove your lies:

The Trilateral Process: The United States, Ukraine, Russia and Nuclear Weapons
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Ukraine had the world’s third largest nuclear arsenal on its territory. When Ukrainian-Russian negotiations on removing these weapons from Ukraine appeared to break down in September 1993, the U.S. government engaged in a trilateral process with Ukraine...

3. OK, my point being that a few small nuclear devices meant to knock down a few incoming ICBMs from the ME are not a threat to Russia and their 10,000 nuclear warheads. Hypersonic missiles can now be plane launched, so who needs silo based missiles?
Last edited: