For 8 years the right has been called racist.

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

No, the right will still be racist.
For the last 8 years, Tom Brady has been called a great quarterback.
Because he is a great quarterback.

Do you see how this works?

Hmmm let me see.....

I have been called:
the world's best dad
The coolest grandpa
The best remodeling contractors
The most amazing husband
The nicest person ever met
The best grandson a grandmother can have
The best brother ever

Etc...


So I guess I am all those things huh?

 

[Correll]

Give me your top example.

ONE, so that I can seriously address it.


(ps kudos for not denying the study)

...How can you address a general problem conservatives among them, as a group, have?

Let's take the basic, widespread denial that tax-cuts increase deficits and debt? It is impossible to admit for many conservatives, no matter the overwhelming evidence and expert economic consensus. I don't see liberals ever denying that spending increases debt, but tax-cut fantasies are basically par-for-the-course in conservatism.

Tax cuts have historically increased revenue. Reagan's tax cuts are a prime example.


If we could ever control spending growth, increasing tax revenue would be a relatively painless way to eventually eliminate the deficit while improving economy to the betterment of all.


The problem with that is that more and more spending is entitlements that cannot be controlled.


And many conservatives are wedded to the idea of the Free Market to the point that they cannot consider other possible avenues to growth.


This is really your top example?

What part of this do you find offensive?

 

[Correll]

If the people running the voting are as convinced as you are that Republicans are Evul Racist Nazis who need to be stopped, do you really think they would take steps to protect the rights of the "nazis"?

Nazi's? Maybe a little extreme
Do I think the motivation of Republicans is to turn away voters who are unlikely to vote for them?

Absolutely

Godwin smears against republicans are made here daily. It is thus NOT extreme of me to suggest that some lefties believe that.


The rest of your post has nothing to do with anything I said.

YOu completely failed to address, let alone challenge my point.


If the people running the voting are as convinced as you are that Republicans are Evul Racist Nazis who need to be stopped, do you really think they would take steps to protect the rights of the "nazis"?

Can I offer you a "Hitlery"???

Yes, Republicans are trying to suppress the vote under the excuse of fighting nonexistent voter fraud

"Yeah, but you too" does not challenge my point.

"I'm not a puppet....You're a puppet"

Your reply in no way undermined my point.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Why do you keep addressing your Nazi overlords?
Are you denying that we have significant racism now, and even more in the recent past, against black Americans?

It sounds like you are.

I'm pointing out that you are a mindless demagogue who slanders and libels those who are identified as enemies of your shameful party.

And yeah, that does make you a fucking scumbag..

I don't have a party, dumbass.
I am just tired of stupid white people.
It is time to wake the fuck up.

If I said I was tired of "stupid black people" you would say that was racist so how the fuck is your statement any different? Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Dumbfuck

 

[Correll]

For 8 years the right has been called racist.

For eight years many on the right have been talking about how Obama is a secret Kenyan and a Mulsim, a foreigner who illegally snuck into Presidency.

You get what you put in.

Do you think that a person's childhood environment has any influence on them?

Whooop, there you go again.

That was not an answer.

Do you think that a person's childhood environment has any influence on them?

Obama is as American as apple pie, the fact that you even want to go down this his-is-a-foreigner road tells me that when you look at that not-white-man you have a bias thought pattern.

Many americans Presidents and candidates spent a lot of time in other countries, nobody tried to go down the road of accusing them of being foreign.

Ok, so you do NOT believe that a person's child hood environment has any influence on them. Got it.


It is not racist to disagree with that. Can you see that?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

So you're just a racist pile of shit. You hate others based on skin color.

Very common among you shameful democrats.

I love myself. I am white. I am just not stupid like the morons who deny racism against blacks for the last 400 years in America.

Trump is one of those idiots. And so are most of the Trump supporters posting in this thread.

No one is denying racism exists. I see you have to move the goalposts in order for your rebuttal to appear to make sense. It doesn't & you've failed yet again

 

[2aguy]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

can you fathom that at least some of thr opposition to obama and driving force behind the 'tea party' was racism?

There wasn't any racism in the Tea Party.....a democrat operative stated they intended to attack the Tea Party and they were going to use the typical democrat playbook of calling them racists....

The actual racists..the democrats...are the party of racism....racists of all colors make up the democrat party from top to bottom...

 

[2aguy]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

can you fathom that at least some of thr opposition to obama and driving force behind the 'tea party' was racism?

Just because you always saw some racist signs or t-shirts at Tea Party or Trump rallies does not mean Republicans are racist. It simply means racists aren't made to feel uncomfortable in the Republican Party...they're "tolerant" and "big tent" that way.

From the video sting on bob craemer and scott foval.....democrat operatives who have been attacking republican political rallies, you can bet that those wearing those racist T-shirts came from their outfit working for the Democrat National Committee......they are on video stating what they do to attack Republican rallies.......and they take orders directly from the Democrat National Committee director of Special Events...it is all on video...in their own words...and they both just stepped down...which means they will be on vacation till after the election..then they will get a promotion in the Democrat National Committee....

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

[

Even USMB seems to be aware of the derogatory nature of the N-word lol. Never had a program prove my point.

Yet JayZ used it IN the White House, about Obama to his face.

Yet you Brown Shirts thought that was fine, since it was a good party member who did it.

He's a rapper . Using "gga" which is different that "gger" . And he's black .

Like country music singing about "rednecks" or "white trash " .

Rednecks are rednecks just like a ****** is a ******. Only cowards are afraid to use the terms where appropriate. Hell you wont even spell it out you're such a pc coward. You're likely one of those idiots that see the term ****** or redneck as a descriptive of color. Many do. To me it defines an attitude or a celebration of a degraded culture. Color is not mutually exclusive to either.

 

[OKTexas]

Damn I'm impressed, you managed to get racist, cowards, pussies and bullies referring to Texans all in one post. LMAO Run along retard your mommy is calling.

You haven't had a free and fair election in your sorry ass state EVER!

Ya think voter ID or making sure only eligible citizens are registered will help?

Only eligible citizens are registered already, idiot.

And given there were ZERO cases of in-person voter impersonation fraud in Texas, this year will be a continuation of the 140 year old tradition of suppressing black votes through racist laws, sheer brutality, and a whole host of ways that white cowards keep power over people who are a little smarter and far more righteous than you and your ilk.

I bet all that lying really makes you really really tired. I know of two registration fraud convictions in my county last election. But let's not little things like facts get in the way of good propaganda, right? I think your mommy is getting mad because you're up past your bed time.

Your state had ZERO case of in-person voter impersonation fraud.

Ergo, the photo ID's can't stop voter fraud. Because you can't get less than zero.

So the thousands of people you disenfranchise are all crimes against your own citizens. That is pretty sick and cowardly.

You're full of shit, when you can't verify the citizenship of a person voting there are potentially millions of cases, but integrity of the vote is the last thing you regressives want. ID is only half the equation.

 

[Camp]

In person voter impersonation is easy to confirm

Someone voted in your name and you show up and are told you already voted
A person shows up and gives a name and that person had voted already

NEVER happens.

If the people running the voting are as convinced as you are that Republicans are Evul Racist Nazis who need to be stopped, do you really think they would take steps to protect the rights of the "nazis"?

Nazi's? Maybe a little extreme
Do I think the motivation of Republicans is to turn away voters who are unlikely to vote for them?

Absolutely

Godwin smears against republicans are made here daily. It is thus NOT extreme of me to suggest that some lefties believe that.


The rest of your post has nothing to do with anything I said.

YOu completely failed to address, let alone challenge my point.


If the people running the voting are as convinced as you are that Republicans are Evul Racist Nazis who need to be stopped, do you really think they would take steps to protect the rights of the "nazis"?

Can I offer you a "Hitlery"???

Yes, Republicans are trying to suppress the vote under the excuse of fighting nonexistent voter fraud

Can you provide an actual pending court case where an individual was denied, through state legislation, the opportunity to vote because no means to obtain a valid voter ID could be provided? I often find those who use voter suppression in association to voter ID, often have the most difficult time backing that up. So rather than find an actual legal case in support of that view, the left are often found changing the subject of the discussion over a failure to provide a validation to their point.

Voter ID laws are being knocked down across the country because of the poisonous details that make them more than just ID laws or are written in such ways that make them obvious voter suppression laws. In this case, a WWII Iwo Jima veterans got turned away because his veteran ID from the VA was not accepted.

veteransnewsnow.com/2016/02/27/iwo-jima-veteran-stopped-from-voting-in-wisconsin-republicans-laugh/

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

The Southern Strategy is a myth.

Nixon, the supposed father of the Southern Strategy is the one who desegregated the South's schools.

He did it as quickly and aggressively as possible so that it would be a done before the election.

That was as close as he came to pandering to the racists, to crush their resistance as far away from the election as he could.

Southern Strategy is still going strong

Note how I supported my claim with strong historical evidence.

Then note how you did NOTHING but voice your unsupported opinion and completely failed to even attempt to challenge my provided evidence or my reasoning.


I challenge you to trump the historical example I provided.

Hint: YOU CAN'T.

But you are too dishonest to admit that.

OK....come with me in my Wayback Machine

Pre 1965, Solid South, all Democrats running the south
1965 , Democrat LBJ signs Civil Rights act. South is outraged

1968, Republicans start Southern Strategy to steal those outraged voters away from the Democrats. Republicans start railing against policies like busing, affirmative action, public accommodation. All red meat to the racists

2016, South is solid Red for Republicans at all levels of government

Interesting when Senator Byrd is specifically mentioned in history as leading an 83 day filibuster against the civil raights act of 1964. I wonder if rightringer knows the "party" that he was associated with? This is why the left going with the accusation of "all republicans are racist" during that period of history fails every time. Key points of History, and those specific names involved, have a way of always revealing the truth.

Excellent point

And what direction did Byrd take on Civil Rights after 1964? He ended up being endorsed by the NAACP for his voting record

No Republican is endorsed by the NAACP

That is your southern strategy

So now "endorsement" is your best example to prove racism? So that would likewise mean the NRA never endorsing any democrat validates the democrat party's desire to do away with the second amendment. Let's try sticking to actual historical facts over an ideological endorsement shall we? At least you can ATTEMPT to bring more credibility to your argument.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

For 8 years the right has been called racist.

For eight years many on the right have been talking about how Obama is a secret Kenyan and a Mulsim, a foreigner who illegally snuck into Presidency.

You get what you put in.

Do you think that a person's childhood environment has any influence on them?

Whooop, there you go again.

That was not an answer.

Do you think that a person's childhood environment has any influence on them?

Obama is as American as apple pie, the fact that you even want to go down this his-is-a-foreigner road tells me that when you look at that not-white-man you have a bias thought pattern.

Many americans Presidents and candidates spent a lot of time in other countries, nobody tried to go down the road of accusing them of being foreign.

Except when it came to Ted Cruz and his qualification to run for president

 

[OKTexas]

Ya think voter ID or making sure only eligible citizens are registered will help?

Only eligible citizens are registered already, idiot.

And given there were ZERO cases of in-person voter impersonation fraud in Texas, this year will be a continuation of the 140 year old tradition of suppressing black votes through racist laws, sheer brutality, and a whole host of ways that white cowards keep power over people who are a little smarter and far more righteous than you and your ilk.

I bet all that lying really makes you really really tired. I know of two registration fraud convictions in my county last election. But let's not little things like facts get in the way of good propaganda, right? I think your mommy is getting mad because you're up past your bed time.

Your state had ZERO case of in-person voter impersonation fraud.

Ergo, the photo ID's can't stop voter fraud. Because you can't get less than zero.

So the thousands of people you disenfranchise are all crimes against your own citizens. That is pretty sick and cowardly.

i trust you have some viable documentation that there was ZERO cases of in-person voter impersonation fraud.

You do, right?

Right?

Dude, if someone committed in-person voter impersonation fraud, YOU HAVE THE BURDEN TO PROVE IT.

My proof is the NONEXISTENCE of the evidence of that kind of fraud in Texas.

Non existence, NOT.

Only two cases are described as "voter impersonation" on the list. Whether voter impersonation is a standing problem has been a hot button in the state’s legislative debates over proposed voter ID laws in 2005, 2007, 2009 and 2011; Austin American-Statesman news stories say legislators mostly split along party lines, with Democrats claiming impersonation is rare and Republicans claiming the problem is significant. Abbott drew criticism in 2006 for creating a special unit to target voter fraud that by mid-2008 had yielded, according to a May 19, 2008, Associated Pressnews story, only 26 prosecutions.

Looking at all 57 election fraud prosecutions from 2002 to 2012, we tallied up the resolutions (some had multiple outcomes, when charges were pursued as separate cases):

• Specified as convictions: 26
• Guilty plea resulting in conviction: 2
• Deferred adjudication: 19
• Pre-trial diversion: 10
• Acquitted: 2
• Dismissed: 4

Greg Abbott claims 50 election fraud convictions since 2002

Now oh ignorant one, tell us exactly how many aren't being caught?

 

[rightwinger]

Southern Strategy is still going strong

Note how I supported my claim with strong historical evidence.

Then note how you did NOTHING but voice your unsupported opinion and completely failed to even attempt to challenge my provided evidence or my reasoning.


I challenge you to trump the historical example I provided.

Hint: YOU CAN'T.

But you are too dishonest to admit that.

OK....come with me in my Wayback Machine

Pre 1965, Solid South, all Democrats running the south
1965 , Democrat LBJ signs Civil Rights act. South is outraged

1968, Republicans start Southern Strategy to steal those outraged voters away from the Democrats. Republicans start railing against policies like busing, affirmative action, public accommodation. All red meat to the racists

2016, South is solid Red for Republicans at all levels of government

Interesting when Senator Byrd is specifically mentioned in history as leading an 83 day filibuster against the civil raights act of 1964. I wonder if rightringer knows the "party" that he was associated with? This is why the left going with the accusation of "all republicans are racist" during that period of history fails every time. Key points of History, and those specific names involved, have a way of always revealing the truth.

Excellent point

And what direction did Byrd take on Civil Rights after 1964? He ended up being endorsed by the NAACP for his voting record

No Republican is endorsed by the NAACP

That is your southern strategy

So now "endorsement" is your best example to prove racism? So that would likewise mean the NRA never endorsing any democrat validates the democrat party's desire to do away with the second amendment. Let's try sticking to actual historical facts over an ideological endorsement shall we? At least you can ATTEMPT to bring more credibility to your argument.

Kind of went right over your head....didn't it big fella?

The point is Byrd changed. So much so that he had an admirable record on Civil Rights
Republicans also changed, from the party of Lincoln, a party that fought for civil rights....to a party that opposes rights for women, blacks, gays and minorities

 

[OKTexas]

I embrace the fact that using certain terms to someone can have different meaning according to the person using those terms, like I said you trying to deny that fact makes you dishonest, or the most ignorant person in this thread. So what is it dishonest or ignorant?

You mean according to the RACE of the person using the terms, it's you that's too ignorant see and to dishonest to admit, that position is racist.

Sure race. Like I said when a black person uses n1gger he isn't being derogatory to the guys race. How could he be he has that same race? A white person can't claim the same. That's why it depends. It isn't racist but simply a different context. If you don't realise that I guess you have answered my question. You are not dishonest, simply ignorant, thanks for clearing that up.

Run along racist with your moral relativism, if a white uses the term in the exact same context they would still be called a racist. Of course if a black calls a white a cracker, they can't be racist right?

Remember when Zimmerman got slammed for answering a question about the subject's race while Martin got a pass for calling Zimmerman a cracker?

Zimmerman got a pass for killing Martin

That happens when you're defending yourself.

 

[OKTexas]

Give me your top example.

ONE, so that I can seriously address it.


(ps kudos for not denying the study)

...How can you address a general problem conservatives among them, as a group, have?

Let's take the basic, widespread denial that tax-cuts increase deficits and debt? It is impossible to admit for many conservatives, no matter the overwhelming evidence and expert economic consensus. I don't see liberals ever denying that spending increases debt, but tax-cut fantasies are basically par-for-the-course in conservatism.

The only thing that increases deficits and debt is spending more than you take in. If revenue falls, spending has to be adjusted, politicians refuse to grasp the concept. We don't have a taxing problem, we have a spending problem.

 

[rightwinger]

You mean according to the RACE of the person using the terms, it's you that's too ignorant see and to dishonest to admit, that position is racist.

Sure race. Like I said when a black person uses n1gger he isn't being derogatory to the guys race. How could he be he has that same race? A white person can't claim the same. That's why it depends. It isn't racist but simply a different context. If you don't realise that I guess you have answered my question. You are not dishonest, simply ignorant, thanks for clearing that up.

Run along racist with your moral relativism, if a white uses the term in the exact same context they would still be called a racist. Of course if a black calls a white a cracker, they can't be racist right?

Remember when Zimmerman got slammed for answering a question about the subject's race while Martin got a pass for calling Zimmerman a cracker?

Zimmerman got a pass for killing Martin

That happens when you're defending yourself.

Zimmerman was a stalker

 

[paulitician]

It's a Fascistic approach. If you don't go along, you need to be punished. But to be fair, that Fascistic approach has been adopted by both Republican and Democrat. It's why we desperately need to follow the Constitution.

Our Founding Fathers fully understood humanity's Fascistic Mob-Rule tendency. The Constitution is an invaluable road map. Follow it, and we can't go wrong.

 

[ogibillm]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

can you fathom that at least some of thr opposition to obama and driving force behind the 'tea party' was racism?

The tea party is more of a difference in the ideological role of government. Can you comprehend the difference between clear racial statements, from those who demonstrate and protest a different political view of our government? Do you have any links to actual statements that are made from those leaders of the tea party movement, that show nothing else but a clear racial hatred statement towards the president?

you aren't really asking for this, are you?

I am questioning your ability to be able to comprehend the difference. No spin of explanation to try and create a racial atmosphere, a clear racial slur and hateful racial statement from the leaders in charge of the tea party movement. You see a democrat supporter can quite easily create a sentiment of racism by creating a sign and infiltrating in the middle a tea party movement for a photo op (and don't tell me the democrats wouldn't dream of such an attempt to justify THEIR cause). I want a clear racial statement and slur that is without question and can't be disproven

www.msnbc.com/msnbc/tea-party-fail/

O.C. Tea Partier Sends Racist Obama Email

newsone.com/756875/tea-partys-carl-paladino-who-sent-racist-emails-wins-n-y-gop-gov-nomination/

Tea Party Express spokesman resigns after racist blog post

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1600376


and theb there's all the science that shows the rank and file tea party supporter is more likely to harbor racial animus

Are Tea Partiers racists?