For 8 years the right has been called racist.

[OKTexas]

Sure race. Like I said when a black person uses n1gger he isn't being derogatory to the guys race. How could he be he has that same race? A white person can't claim the same. That's why it depends. It isn't racist but simply a different context. If you don't realise that I guess you have answered my question. You are not dishonest, simply ignorant, thanks for clearing that up.

Run along racist with your moral relativism, if a white uses the term in the exact same context they would still be called a racist. Of course if a black calls a white a cracker, they can't be racist right?

Remember when Zimmerman got slammed for answering a question about the subject's race while Martin got a pass for calling Zimmerman a cracker?

Zimmerman got a pass for killing Martin

That happens when you're defending yourself.

Zimmerman was a stalker

No he was a neighborhood watch captain in an area were there was growing crime. He had every right to keep an eye on his community, just as you and I do. Martin made it physical and got what he deserved.

 

[ogibillm]

There wasn't any racism in the Tea Party..

you aren't that dumb that you actually believe that. why would you lie?

 

[ogibillm]

Martin made it physical

2 things

1) you don't know that
2) even if he did you don't know martin didn't feel reasonably threatened

 

[gipper]

Only some Republicans are racists...the rest are just assholes

 

[OKTexas]

Martin made it physical

2 things

1) you don't know that
2) even if he did you don't know martin didn't feel reasonably threatened

Tell it to the jury that heard all the evidence. They decided Zimmerman was justified and returned a not guilty verdict.

 

[ogibillm]

Martin made it physical

2 things

1) you don't know that
2) even if he did you don't know martin didn't feel reasonably threatened

Tell it to the jury that heard all the evidence. They decided Zimmerman was justified and returned a not guilty verdict.

jesus. if you don't know what you're talking about just shut the fuck up.

 

[rightwinger]

Only some Republicans are racists...the rest are just assholes

I always enjoy when Republicans show how great their party was.......150 years ago

 

[paulitician]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

 

[ogibillm]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

 

[paulitician]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.

 

[OKTexas]

Martin made it physical

2 things

1) you don't know that
2) even if he did you don't know martin didn't feel reasonably threatened

Tell it to the jury that heard all the evidence. They decided Zimmerman was justified and returned a not guilty verdict.

jesus. if you don't know what you're talking about just shut the fuck up.

So you're saying he wasn't acquitted? REALLY!?

 

[ogibillm]

Martin made it physical

2 things

1) you don't know that
2) even if he did you don't know martin didn't feel reasonably threatened

Tell it to the jury that heard all the evidence. They decided Zimmerman was justified and returned a not guilty verdict.

jesus. if you don't know what you're talking about just shut the fuck up.

So you're saying he wasn't acquitted? REALLY!?

I'm saying it's clear you don't understand who had the burden of proof.

you clearly do not know what you are talking about, it'd be better if you remained silent in your ignorance

 

[OKTexas]

Martin made it physical

2 things

1) you don't know that
2) even if he did you don't know martin didn't feel reasonably threatened

Tell it to the jury that heard all the evidence. They decided Zimmerman was justified and returned a not guilty verdict.

jesus. if you don't know what you're talking about just shut the fuck up.

So you're saying he wasn't acquitted? REALLY!?

I'm saying it's clear you don't understand who had the burden of proof.

you clearly do not know what you are talking about, it'd be better if you remained silent in your ignorance

So why don't you give me a detailed explanation of what I don't understand.

 

[gipper]

Only some Republicans are racists...the rest are just assholes

I always enjoy when Republicans show how great their party was.......150 years ago

No. It shows how bad your party was and still is.

 

[ogibillm]

2 things

1) you don't know that
2) even if he did you don't know martin didn't feel reasonably threatened

Tell it to the jury that heard all the evidence. They decided Zimmerman was justified and returned a not guilty verdict.

jesus. if you don't know what you're talking about just shut the fuck up.

So you're saying he wasn't acquitted? REALLY!?

I'm saying it's clear you don't understand who had the burden of proof.

you clearly do not know what you are talking about, it'd be better if you remained silent in your ignorance

So why don't you give me a detailed explanation of what I don't understand.

I've already told you - you clearly don't understand who had the burden of proof and what the acquittal actually meant.

of you want to discuss it further start a thread, this one is about the righr wing delusion that there are no racists in their ranks

 

[OKTexas]

Tell it to the jury that heard all the evidence. They decided Zimmerman was justified and returned a not guilty verdict.

jesus. if you don't know what you're talking about just shut the fuck up.

So you're saying he wasn't acquitted? REALLY!?

I'm saying it's clear you don't understand who had the burden of proof.

you clearly do not know what you are talking about, it'd be better if you remained silent in your ignorance

So why don't you give me a detailed explanation of what I don't understand.

I've already told you - you clearly don't understand who had the burden of proof and what the acquittal actually meant.

of you want to discuss it further start a thread, this one is about the righr wing delusion that there are no racists in their ranks

I fully understand the verdict didn't go the way you wanted, so your pissed about it. You want some cheese with that whine?

 

[ogibillm]

jesus. if you don't know what you're talking about just shut the fuck up.

So you're saying he wasn't acquitted? REALLY!?

I'm saying it's clear you don't understand who had the burden of proof.

you clearly do not know what you are talking about, it'd be better if you remained silent in your ignorance

So why don't you give me a detailed explanation of what I don't understand.

I've already told you - you clearly don't understand who had the burden of proof and what the acquittal actually meant.

of you want to discuss it further start a thread, this one is about the righr wing delusion that there are no racists in their ranks

I fully understand the verdict didn't go the way you wanted, so your pissed about it. You want some cheese with that whine?

it didn't, but at least i understand what the verdict meant. now again, if you want to put your ignorance on display please start a thread. this one is about a different right-wing delusion

 

[OKTexas]

So you're saying he wasn't acquitted? REALLY!?

I'm saying it's clear you don't understand who had the burden of proof.

you clearly do not know what you are talking about, it'd be better if you remained silent in your ignorance

So why don't you give me a detailed explanation of what I don't understand.

I've already told you - you clearly don't understand who had the burden of proof and what the acquittal actually meant.

of you want to discuss it further start a thread, this one is about the righr wing delusion that there are no racists in their ranks

I fully understand the verdict didn't go the way you wanted, so your pissed about it. You want some cheese with that whine?

it didn't, but at least i understand what the verdict meant. now again, if you want to put your ignorance on display please start a thread. this one is about a different right-wing delusion

Yeah, it meant the state couldn't prove the shooting was not justified. Otherwise the jury would have convicted, they didn't. Deal with it.

 

[ogibillm]

I'm saying it's clear you don't understand who had the burden of proof.

you clearly do not know what you are talking about, it'd be better if you remained silent in your ignorance

So why don't you give me a detailed explanation of what I don't understand.

I've already told you - you clearly don't understand who had the burden of proof and what the acquittal actually meant.

of you want to discuss it further start a thread, this one is about the righr wing delusion that there are no racists in their ranks

I fully understand the verdict didn't go the way you wanted, so your pissed about it. You want some cheese with that whine?

it didn't, but at least i understand what the verdict meant. now again, if you want to put your ignorance on display please start a thread. this one is about a different right-wing delusion

Yeah, it meant the state couldn't prove the shooting was not justified. Otherwise the jury would have convicted, they didn't. Deal with it.

do you not see the difference between that post and whatnyou claimed the jury found earlier?

 

[OKTexas]

So why don't you give me a detailed explanation of what I don't understand.

I've already told you - you clearly don't understand who had the burden of proof and what the acquittal actually meant.

of you want to discuss it further start a thread, this one is about the righr wing delusion that there are no racists in their ranks

I fully understand the verdict didn't go the way you wanted, so your pissed about it. You want some cheese with that whine?

it didn't, but at least i understand what the verdict meant. now again, if you want to put your ignorance on display please start a thread. this one is about a different right-wing delusion

Yeah, it meant the state couldn't prove the shooting was not justified. Otherwise the jury would have convicted, they didn't. Deal with it.

do you not see the difference between that post and whatnyou claimed the jury found earlier?

Nope, the jury said the shooting was justified, based on the evidence, by not convicting.