Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Sign Bill Banning Social Media ‘Deplatforming’

[colfax_m]

Targeting Facebook and Twitter is a violation of so many constitutional values.

Only if the unelected demigods on the SC say so

And no one knows what they will say

So equal protection under the law isn’t really a thing for you anymore?

 

[Mac-7]

What would repealing 230 achieve, in your view?

It would make FaceBook the target for every greedy ambulance chasing lawyer in lib la la land

 

[Mac-7]

So equal protection under the law isn’t really a thing for you anymore?

Again, spin it however you like

But my contention would be that those two monsters are so big that no one else compares with them

 

[Faun]

I’m well aware of what you think it means, colloquially. But this is a discussion about law, so the definition that matters is the legal one.

Social media don’t fit the legal definition of a public forum.

These terms matter.

This discussion is about the lies posted by the OP and your abject stupidity in failing to find out what the Florida proposal actually is.

You Nazis have no defense against the facts, so you lie. It's your way.

If social media doesn't fit the definition of a public forum, then it isn't protected by 230 and can be sued for the bullshit slander and libel they publish non-stop.

Social media companies are private companies. This forum is not a public forum and they can take down someone who breaks the rules. This forum would fit your definition of a public forum.

You are the one who is stupid. You are the Nazi and the liar.

According to these nuts, this forum is fascist and the moderators are Nazis.

You are an Iranian Troll and you Support the Nazi democrats.

 

[Faun]

So-called conservatives are the ones who have ripped of their disguises. You have ahown yourselves to be fascists. Private companies do not censor. Only government can. You want to take the company's property. That is fascism.

ROFL - You Nazis and your lies.

Fascists support a centrally planned and managed economy.

Republicans don't.

Nazi democrats do!

Fascists oppress freedom of speech with hate speech laws.

Republicans don't.

Nazi democrats do!

Fascists scapegoat a race as focal point for hatred, such as Der Juden, the Whites.

Republicans don't.

Nazi democrats do!

Fascists repress religion that has doctrine in opposition to their Reich.

Republicans don't.

Nazi democrats do!

Fascists support totalitarian dictatorship.

Republicans don't.

Nazi democrats do!

Fascists have group privilege and end individual rights.

Republicans don't.

Nazi democrats do!

Tell me more about these Nazi Democrats, Fruitcake....

 

[Faun]

No he should not. Refusing to service a Muslim because they are a Muslim is illegal.

But refusing service to a Christian because they are a Christian as Facebook does on a daily basis is just clean fun, right Nazi?

Not because they're Christian, ya ******* retard. You do know that Christians still have access to Facebook, don'tcha, Fruitcake?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

wanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.

Free speech in

the public square benefits everyone in the long run

Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run

Except FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.

Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their website

We should repeal that law

Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their website

We should repeal that law

On what grounds? Butthurt?

 

[dblack]

What would repealing 230 achieve, in your view?

It would make FaceBook the target for every greedy ambulance chasing lawyer in lib la la land

And how would that achieve your goal of a "level playing field"?

 

[Mac-7]

what grounds? Butthurt?

On the grounds that FaceBook is suppressing one side of the issues

 

[Faun]

just take it away from the ones abusing it,,

Ok

Remove FaceBook and Twitter from the exempt list

So this site should lose that protection for banning members who violate their terms of service so that they can be sued out of business for libelous comments by members? You realize that would be the end of all such forum on the Internet, right?

Why do you hate free speech?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

what grounds? Butthurt?

On the grounds that FaceBook is suppressing one side of the issues

On the grounds that FaceBook is suppressing one side of the issues

Ahh....so butthurt it is.

 

[Mac-7]

how would that achieve your goal of a "level playing field"?

It might not

But if not we would be no worse off than we are now with liberal censorship of conservative speech

and FaceBook would be subject to lawsuits from both sides

 

[Faun]

what grounds? Butthurt?

On the grounds that FaceBook is suppressing one side of the issues

Why should a private company be forced into promoting conspiracy nonsense that's harmful to the nation?

 

[Mac-7]

just take it away from the ones abusing it,,

Ok

Remove FaceBook and Twitter from the exempt list

So this should lose that protection for banning members who violate their terms of service so that they can be sued out of business for libelous comments by members? You realize that would be the end of all such forum on the Internet, right?

Why do you hate free speech?

We only need to remove FaceBook and Twitter from the protected list

 

[Mac-7]

Why should a private company be forced into promoting conspiracy nonsense that's harmful to the nation?

Because its only your opinion that its nonsense

And thats not enough to limit free speech of others

 

[Faun]

just take it away from the ones abusing it,,

Ok

Remove FaceBook and Twitter from the exempt list

So this should lose that protection for banning members who violate their terms of service so that they can be sued out of business for libelous comments by members? You realize that would be the end of all such forum on the Internet, right?

Why do you hate free speech?

We only need to remove FaceBook and Twitter from the protected list

It doesn't work that way. You can't cherry pick which forums are protected and which ones aren't.

Why do you hate free speech?

 

[Faun]

Why should a private company be forced into promoting conspiracy nonsense that's harmful to the nation?

Because its only your opinion that its nonsense

And thats not enough to limit free speech of others

Nope, it's not just my opinion. It's fact that Biden won the election fair and square. That fact is supported by the courts, federal government agencies, the Congress. Essentially every legal means available. So yeah, the Big Lie is nothing but conspiracy nonsense. And it's harmful to this nation. No private company should be forced into promoting it.

 

[progressive hunter]

just take it away from the ones abusing it,,

Ok

Remove FaceBook and Twitter from the exempt list

So this site should lose that protection for banning members who violate their terms of service so that they can be sued out of business for libelous comments by members? You realize that would be the end of all such forum on the Internet, right?

Why do you hate free speech?

if they do it in a selective manner like FB and twitter are doing,,

 

[progressive hunter]

 

[WEATHER53]

just take it away from the ones abusing it,,

Ok

Remove FaceBook and Twitter from the exempt list

So this site should lose that protection for banning members who violate their terms of service so that they can be sued out of business for libelous comments by members? You realize that would be the end of all such forum on the Internet, right?

Why do you hate free speech?

Problem is they don’t specific their terms of service when they sign you up. They do provide the boilerplate that other sites do but they don’t specify the actions they have been taking. You do Not pre agree when accepting their invitation to sign up that pro Trump commentary will be labeled as lies or misleading and deleted and if you continue to do so you will be banned.