Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There’s no special laws. Section 230 (which you thought was written in the 30s) protects all websites equally. Twitter and Facebook are popular on their merits.The Reich used their government power to force the industry to serve them.
Just as Republicans are doing here.
It wasn’t cooperation, it was coercion.
Not really, the Reich before yours used special laws to support concerns that were beneficial to the Reich while stuffing the boards of directors with Reich members.
Just as your Reich does now.
another cleverly worded lie,,The Reich used their government power to force the industry to serve them.Industry was an extension of the Reich, just as FascisTwat is an extension of the democrat party.
Just as Republicans are doing here.
It wasn’t cooperation, it was coercion.
youre lying again,,,There’s no special laws. Section 230 (which you thought was written in the 30s) protects all websites equally. Twitter and Facebook are popular on their merits.The Reich used their government power to force the industry to serve them.
Just as Republicans are doing here.
It wasn’t cooperation, it was coercion.
Not really, the Reich before yours used special laws to support concerns that were beneficial to the Reich while stuffing the boards of directors with Reich members.
Just as your Reich does now.
The special laws are being written by Republicans to force industry to help maintain their power. That’s fascism for you.
Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long runwanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
Except FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run
Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their websiteFree speech inwanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
the public square benefits everyone in the long runExcept FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run
dont repeal it,, just take it away from the ones abusing it,,Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their websiteFree speech inwanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
the public square benefits everyone in the long runExcept FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run
We should repeal that law
Explain how that is going to promote freedom of expression on the internet.Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their websiteFree speech inwanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
the public square benefits everyone in the long runExcept FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run
We should repeal that law
Sure. We should repeal all kinds of laws propping up business. But in this case, it wouldn't change much. Few more lawsuits maybe. But in the end the lawyers would massage the terms of service, the courts would establish precedent and things would be pretty much the same as they are now.Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their websiteFree speech inwanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
the public square benefits everyone in the long runExcept FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run
We should repeal that law
Okjust take it away from the ones abusing it,,
You are entitled to your opinionSure. We should repeal all kinds of laws propping up business. But in this case, it wouldn't change much. Few more lawsuits maybe, but in the end the lawyers would massage the terms of service, the courts would establish precedent and things would be pretty much the same.Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their websiteFree speech inwanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
the public square benefits everyone in the long runExcept FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run
We should repeal that law
It wonthow that is going to promote freedom of expression on the internet.
You are entitled to your opinionSure. We should repeal all kinds of laws propping up business. But in this case, it wouldn't change much. Few more lawsuits maybe, but in the end the lawyers would massage the terms of service, the courts would establish precedent and things would be pretty much the same.Thanks to an act of congress Facebook is immune from lawsuits based on what appears on their websiteFree speech inwanting to punish people merely for failing to benefit your political leaders is pretty fascist.
the public square benefits everyone in the long runExcept FB allows use of their private property under conditions agreed to by their users. There is no “public” there.Free speech in the public square benefits everyone in the long run
We should repeal that law
But I dont think that little rodent zuckerberg would be so indifferent about the idea
I want a level playing fieldyou just want revenge on Zuckerberg, eh?
Ah. So you don’t want to fix the problem, you’re just out for political revenge.It wonthow that is going to promote freedom of expression on the internet.
What it will do is cause big headaches for FaceBook
And they deserve it
There is no list. It’s all websites. Targeting Facebook and Twitter is a violation of so many constitutional values.Remove FaceBook and Twitter from the exempt list
My change will put a muzzle on them too
they are acting as a publisherOkjust take it away from the ones abusing it,,
Remove FaceBook and Twitter from the exempt list
You can spin it however you likeSo you don’t want to fix the problem, you’re just out for political revenge.
Only if the unelected demigods on the SC say soTargeting Facebook and Twitter is a violation of so many constitutional values.
I don’t have a solution, but at least I don’t want government to punish private companies for failing to help Republicans.You can spin it however you likeSo you don’t want to fix the problem, you’re just out for political revenge.
The standard lib excuse is that they are a private company and can do as they please
If you’d care to improve on that response somehow and offer a solution lets hear it
