Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what? Liz Cheney has already said Trump is guilty.McCarthy proposed members who were potential witnesses and compromised
There were 212 other Republican Congress members available to serve. McCarthy forbid them to serve on the panel.
This is not a trialSo what? Liz Cheney has already said Trump is guilty.
Well you don't exactly have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out do you?Of for God's sake, the committee is headed by a woman who has already determined Trump is guilty.
I think you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that this committee is nothing but political propaganda aimed at damaging Trump or even getting him disqualified from running. Their latest liar, hearsay, witness (Hutchinson) is a good example.Well you don't exactly have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out do you?
Hint....
He has NO defense.
Really?I think you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that this committee is nothing but political propaganda aimed at damaging Trump or even getting him disqualified from running. Their latest liar, hearsay, witness (Hutchinson) is a good example.
She claimed Trump tried to hijack the limo, the SS said he didn't. She lied about that and, she said Trump knew the protestors had weapons, which they did not. See my post #368.Really?
What (specifically) are you accusing her of lying about?
Are you calling the facts of what happened that day as related in sworn testimony by witnesses political propaganda?"I think you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that this committee is nothing but political propaganda aimed at damaging Trump or even getting him disqualified from running. Their latest liar, hearsay, witness (Hutchinson) is a good example.
The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.Are you calling the facts of what happened that day as related in sworn testimony by witnesses political propaganda?"
Is this because the facts do not make Donald Trump and many Republican members of Congress look very good?
That may be the case but it doesn't make the facts "propaganda."
If the facts "damage" your cult leader maybe you ought to reexamine your cult.
Just sayin.
No shit Captain Obvious!!! It's a witch hunt.
The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.
Nope.The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.
The facts of what happened that day are that the protestors were mosty peaceful and one unarmed woman got shot to death by Capitol police. The testimony is all hearsay and there is no cross examination. Their star witness account of the limo incident was shot down by actual witnesses. Those are the facts.
I guess you didn't watch 2000 Mules.There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
You didn’t watch it eitherI guess you didn't watch 2000 Mules.