It is you that could be verifiably deemed deluded, because I have no problem with that.
Of course the perpetrators would want you to change the subject, so I understand. I assure you, there were Muslim hijackers involved.
My issue is that FEMA misrepresented the core structure of the towers which makes analysis of collapse technically impossible for the agency that confirmed what was suspected. That result is invalid because they conducted calculations for a structure that did not exist.
This is what they thought it looked like.
It is you that could be verifiably deemed deluded, because I have no problem with that.
Of course the perpetrators would want you to change the subject, so I understand. I assure you, there were Muslim hijackers involved.
My issue is that FEMA misrepresented the core structure of the towers which makes analysis of collapse technically impossible for the agency that confirmed what was suspected. That result is invalid because they conducted calculations for a structure that did not exist.
This is what they thought it looked like.
fema didnt deceive anyone. they say it was a steel core. the architects say it was a steel core.
It is you that could be verifiably deemed deluded, because I have no problem with that.
Of course the perpetrators would want you to change the subject, so I understand. I assure you, there were Muslim hijackers involved.
My issue is that FEMA misrepresented the core structure of the towers which makes analysis of collapse technically impossible for the agency that confirmed what was suspected. That result is invalid because they conducted calculations for a structure that did not exist.
This is what they thought it looked like.
fema didnt deceive anyone. they say it was a steel core. the architects say it was a steel core.
As a disinformationalist you remove the real evidence
and leave the lie at top in your quote.
No, the lead engineer provided information that was published by Newsweek on September 13, 2001 stating there was a concrete core.
You assertions that the reporter made an error or that the statement is wrong becuse it is not in quotes are nonsense and only show your unreasonable service to the interests of the perpetrators. Information published three days after 3,000 are killed in a building that an engineer providing statements to a globally recognized magazine is going to be the most accurate of all.
Leslie Robertsons statement is verified by the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation that was published in 1992 Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation was published in 1992.
Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6.
As a disinformationalist you remove the real evidence
and leave the lie at top in your quote.
No, the lead engineer provided information that was published by Newsweek on September 13, 2001 stating there was a concrete core.
Your assertions that the reporter made an error or that the statement is wrong becuse it is not in quotes are nonsense and only show your unreasonable service to the interests of the perpetrators. Information published three days after 3,000 are killed in a building that an engineer providing statements to a globally recognized magazine is going to be the most accurate of all.
Leslie Robertsons statement is verified by the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation that was published in 1992 Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation was published in 1992.
Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6.
this is how weak your arguments are.
As a disinformationalist you remove the real evidence
and leave the lie at top in your quote.
No, the lead engineer provided information that was published by Newsweek on September 13, 2001 stating there was a concrete core.
Your assertions that the reporter made an error or that the statement is wrong becuse it is not in quotes are nonsense and only show your unreasonable service to the interests of the perpetrators. Information published three days after 3,000 are killed in a building that an engineer providing statements to a globally recognized magazine is going to be the most accurate of all.
Leslie Robertsons statement is verified by the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation that was published in 1992 Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation was published in 1992.
Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6.
this is how weak your arguments are.
Your statement, without evidence can have no strength. So again, ....... the reverse of what you say is true. And the proof of it is quoted.
You clearly support secret methods of mass murder. There is no concern for the closure that the families of victims need. All America needs the truth for many resaons.
you are another ******* moron that thinks everyone with any logic is a government agent. there was no "secret mass murder".If you think this is gypsum, you are not logical.
So how many witnesses can you assemble that saw the muslims killing the 3,000 victims?
The NIST deprival of the plans by FEMA enabled by guiliani and the NYS courts makes it secret.
You enforce it with your refusal to recognize the violations of law and illogical insistence in naming a 400 foot tall structure gypsum fastened to steel core columns, that do not protrude in that photo and are never seen on 9-11.
and you tell people its concrete, which is an outright LIE!!!If you think this is gypsum, you are not logical.
and you tell people its concrete, which is an outright LIE!!!If you think this is gypsum, you are not logical.
its smoke. you cant see what its made out of because ITS ******* SMOKE!! i'm sure the steel core with the gypsum is on the other side of the smoke creating that shadow but you cant make it out from this picture clearly.
anyone that says they can see concrete in that photo is a ******* liar.
in new york and new jersey live as it happened? probably several hundred thousand.
if you include watching it live on TV probably over 100 million.
another one of your delusional rants that make no sense at all. remember when you were ranting for months... maybe years... that the cause of death on the death certificates was not valid? you never bothered to ******* check what the death certificates actually said. the cause of death was "murder" and it doesnt matter who did it, you ******* deadbeat moron.
now you are going on another delusional rant about FEMA, the NIST and guiliani about some stupid ******* plans or some shit.
who ******* cares? the plans flew into the buildings. they came down. lots of people died. your ******* guiliani tirade is fuckiing moronic. it doesnt change the outcome of what happened. Robertson, the structural engineer, cooperated with both FEMA and the NIST and he had the plans to the buildings. in fact, he had the only set of plans to the buildings that were not located inside the world trade center when it collapsed.
take your anti-psychotics, get a job, pay the $30,000 in child support you owe and try to stay out of jail, ok?
this is your brain
and this is your brain on drugs
Here is more on the 47 vertical core columns that somehow cut themselves and moved out of the way fast enough all the way down to not provide resistance so the top floor of each building could hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would hit the ground if dropped right beside them.
Propaganda debunkers intentionally try and mislead by focusing on the perimeter floor trusses and NOT the central core columns that should have easily stood........unless of course explosives were used to blow them completely out of the way all the way down and in doing so pulverizing everything but the steel before it even hits the ground.
YouTube- WTCCS Scenario - WTC 1 Collapse Arrest
horizontal stress from the vertical columns were transferred via the floor trusses to the outer wall. the steel inner core was designed to carry vertical loads only. the outer wall carried the horizontal loads. without the floors in place the core never would be able to stand. of course the core is going to experiance massive horizontal and vertical loads during a collapse and without the floors of the world trade center in place to transfer the horizontal loads of course it would collapse.
