FBI opens investigation into Letitia James

The only thing she has exposure on is the primary residence issue. Everything else is decades old and well beyond the statute of limitations.

But that one thing looks pretty bad. Probably fraud.

I think Trump should have been criminally charged.

If the FBI finds she faked the POAs to commit tax fraud in both Virginia and New York (which looks likely), she's going away for a long time.

1746734384276.webp
 
If the FBI finds she faked the POAs to commit tax fraud in both Virginia and New York (which looks likely), she's going away for a long time.

View attachment 1108943
If she gets off, then that means activist judiciary are protecting their own and actually showing US that some people are above the law.

Get ready for “Racism” and “Gender” cards to be played as well. We’ve all seen this movie before.
 
His financial condition was a factor in the loan and the size of his residence was a part of that financial condition.

They said they would not give him a loan without the statement of financial condition which was rife with fraud.
Im going to need a link for this ^ claim. I watched the hearing with his bank. They said no such thing. They said the opposite of your dumb ******* claim. :cuckoo:
 
Didn’t you guys say that what Trump did was perfectly legal?
No. What was said, rightly, was that the charges brought against him were illegal and that they had to make stuff up to even get past the statue to limitations.
 
No. What was said, rightly, was that the charges brought against him were illegal and that they had to make stuff up to even get past the statue to limitations.
You're confused. There's so many illegal things Trump did, it's understandable. Hard to keep the various corruption issues separate.

There was nothing made up and no issue with the statute of limitations.
 
Im going to need a link for this ^ claim. I watched the hearing with his bank. They said no such thing. They said the opposite of your dumb ******* claim. :cuckoo:
Donald Trump was aware that receiving loans from the Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management Division required him: to provide a personal guarantee; to maintain a minimum net worth of $2.5 billion; to maintain unencumbered liquidity of $50 million at all times; and to submit annual SFCs to Deutsche Bank, so that Deutsche Bank could test his compliance with the loan covenants.


The financial statements are required.
 
Donald Trump was aware that receiving loans from the Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management Division required him: to provide a personal guarantee; to maintain a minimum net worth of $2.5 billion; to maintain unencumbered liquidity of $50 million at all times; and to submit annual SFCs to Deutsche Bank, so that Deutsche Bank could test his compliance with the loan covenants.


The financial statements are required.
Not one thing in this post says, Trump get a better loan rate because he inflated his home size". :cuckoo:
 
Not one thing in this post says, Trump get a better loan rate because he inflated his home size". :cuckoo:
The expert witness McCarthy testified that his interest rate was lower due to his inflated statement of financial condition.

Page 46.
 
The expert witness McCarthy testified that his interest rate was lower due to his inflated statement of financial condition.

Page 46.

James is really in trouble with the fake Powers of Attorney she filed in VA and NY. That's tax fraud in both states, and interstate crime which makes it the province of the feds.
 
The expert witness McCarthy testified that his interest rate was lower due to his inflated statement of financial condition.

Page 46.
An "expert witness" hired by democrats at $950 per hour is hardly proof of anything. He is going to push any narrative that the dems tell him to, and they certainly woudnt hire him, let alone have him testify in Congress, if he wasnt going to say that.

The bank that gave Trump the loan NEVER said any of that horseshit. :cuckoo:
 
An "expert witness" hired by democrats at $950 per hour is hardly proof of anything. He is going to push any narrative that the dems tell him to, and they certainly woudnt hire him, let alone put him on the stand, if he wasnt going to say that.

The bank that gave Trump the loan NEVER said any of that horseshit. :cuckoo:
You don’t seem to know much about what the bank said.
 
Then how about you post it? Ive been asking for awhile, but you continue to stall.
What have you posted?

Nothing.

Read the decision. It’s very enlightening.
 
What have you posted?

Nothing.

Read the decision. It’s very enlightening.
YOU said the banks would have given him a different rate, but you continue to NOT provide a shred of proof. I watched that hearing and the bank said no such thing. They said that they gave him the loan "because he is a whale in the industry" and that was all that mattered to them, and they were VERY happy with the end result of the loan. They also said they would like to do more loans with him in the future.
 
YOU said the banks would have given him a different rate, but you continue to NOT provide a shred of proof. I watched that hearing and the bank said no such thing. They said that they gave him the loan "because he is a whale in the industry" and that was all that mattered to them, and they were VERY happy with the end result of the loan. They also said they would like to do more loans with him in the future.
Took me a few minutes to get the exact page:
1746747373959.webp


See the second to last paragraph. They wouldn’t have done business without the guarantee and that resulted in favorable pricing.

Where’s your source?
 
The only thing she has exposure on is the primary residence issue. Everything else is decades old and well beyond the statute of limitations.
I'm sure the Feds can get as creative on the SOL as Bragg did.
But that one thing looks pretty bad. Probably fraud.

I think Trump should have been criminally charged.
You doubt James wouldn't have charged Trump criminally is she actually had a case? LOL
 
15th post
Im going to need a link for this ^ claim. I watched the hearing with his bank. They said no such thing. They said the opposite of your dumb ******* claim. :cuckoo:

How could you have watched the hearing with his bank, when the Hearing wasn't televised??? I'd really really like to know the answer to that one.
 
Donald Trump was aware that receiving loans from the Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management Division required him: to provide a personal guarantee; to maintain a minimum net worth of $2.5 billion; to maintain unencumbered liquidity of $50 million at all times; and to submit annual SFCs to Deutsche Bank, so that Deutsche Bank could test his compliance with the loan covenants.


The financial statements are required.
The bank testified

They loved him
 
Kash Patel's FBI has opened a formal investigation into James mortgage issues. Based on a referral, it now has morphed into an active investigation. She listed her father as her husband on documents now under question.

The investigation, first reported by the Albany Times Union, follows a request that the Justice Department investigate James, sent by Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte to the Justice Department last month.

New York’s Northern District, where Pulte’s referral was steered, is led by US Attorney John Sarcone III, an ally of President Trump.

Pulte’s letter alleged James “falsified records” to obtain favorable loans on a home she purchased in 2023 in Virginia and a Brooklyn brownstone she’s owned since 2001.
_________________
“Ms. James, for both properties listed above, appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms,” Pulte told Attorney General Pam Bondi.

That could amount to criminal charges, including wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution, among others, Pulte added.

The FBI and US Attorney’s Office in Albany didn’t immediately return requests for comment Thursday.

James’ office declined to comment.

View attachment 1108842


It would be delicious to see Leticia James receive her come-up-pance for her dishonest and corrupt bogus prosecution of President Trump, but we all know that the media will portray it as lawfare and revenge and will make her look as pure as the driven snow.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom