- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,635
- 5,561
- 198
You have to be really stupid measuring intellect by IQ. No one uses IQ as a general intellect measure for employment, ANYWHERE. Name one.He has a very low IQ.
What is the proper way to troll him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You have to be really stupid measuring intellect by IQ. No one uses IQ as a general intellect measure for employment, ANYWHERE. Name one.He has a very low IQ.
What is the proper way to troll him?
And you don’t ? Hilarious.
The difference is your authority is composed of few nut jobs, while ours is what ? Every university in the world. You like depending upon the stupid few in favor of the educated many.
That’s hilarious. You really don’t know what your asking. That’s the rating under ideal conditions. its just a temporary operational measure. No plant operates under ideal conditions. Long term kWh is the only valid way to compare. Solar energy is cheaper then fossil fuels, nuclear energy etc.
Your inability to know anything about the topic is hilarious.
You have to be really stupid measuring intellect by IQ. No one uses IQ as a general intellect measure for employment, ANYWHERE. Name one.
You are obviously science illiterate. ’ renewable energy’ is not waiting for a million years dufus. Look it up if you’re confused.Everything on this planet is renewable. It might take a million or so years, but everything will renew. Moron..
We were talking about the cost per KWH.That’s hilarious. You really don’t know what your asking.
That’s hilarious. You won't answer.
That’s the rating under ideal conditions.
Of course it is.
No plant operates under ideal conditions.
I know. That's why actual is less than nameplate.
So how do they compare? Solar nameplate versus actual? Nat gas nameplate versus actual?
When you get tired of running away.......
Show how burning wood as processed fuel from a managed tree source would release less CO2 than leaving it on the ground .
Only (stupid) people with diminished intellect still use“IQ”.Sounds like something someone with a very low IQ would say.
Yup.Did their "approval" support your math? Post it.
We were talking about the cost per KWH.
A solar farm is one million per kWh.
Care to guess what a nuclear energy plant is per kWh ?
You said burning wood, I said burning processed wood from managed tree growth.
The epa certified it as carbon neutral. You want specifics….
Is biomass Carbon Neutral? YES and NO
Biomass is one of many renewable energy sources and like the others, it is an alternative to fossil fuels. Biomass is also considered as a "carbon neutral" resource, to explain its advantage over fossil fuel.www.linkedin.com
Yup.
Attacking the persons and not what science they present.
Come on Crick, put on your big boy underwear and lose the panties... Time to grow up.
I’ll do better…..Prove it.
+x-x =0Prove it.
I’ll do better…..
+x-x =0
called carbon neutrality.
No. You can’t even post what I was responding to. Do that and you’ll seem like the retard you are.you've given up on your claim that leaving the wood on the ground releases more CO2 than burning it? LOL!
Why is that ? You claiming Europe and the US are not on the same planet dumbo ?Processing and shipping wood pellets across the Atlantic to burn in Europe is not carbon neutral.
Why is that ? You claiming Europe and the US are not on the same planet dumbo ?
No. You can’t even post what I was responding to. Do that and you’ll seem like the retard you are.
And the wood pellets that are from trees and vegetation that have spent years of recent history converting CO2 to 02…and replaced by vegetation which will continue to do so.It takes carbon based fuel to process the wood.
It takes carbon based fuel to ship the wood across the ocean.
It takes carbon based fuel to move the wood to the powerplant.
Durr.
And do you have the post I was responding too ? Guess not.if you burn wood byproducts that if left on the ground would release more co2 then burning it.
Low IQ liberal. But I repeat myself.