Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
I myself would have an easier time accepting the science that tells us what measures we need to take to combat this problem, if you would show it to me. After you show the science that proves that there is a problem, of course.Deniers here have also constantly IGNORED the possibility that the fossil fuel industry, seeing global warming mitigation measures as an existential threat, might make efforts to slow the acceptance of the science and the measures required to combat this problem. Unfortunately for them, there is a wealth of evidence to prove that this is precisely what they have done and that all deniers have served admirably as the industry's "useful idiots".
You have refused to show me, in spite of several requests on another thread. I'll give you an easy way out:
At first you don't even have to show the science. Just tell me what specifically should be done to combat this problem. Not something vague like "reduce emissions," but concrete steps that will combat this problem.* Tell us whether the steps will be voluntary.
Once you do that, I'll ask about the science.
*For example, if you asked me what steps I favored to alleviate the border crises, I would not say "slow down the flow!" I would say "build more barriers, use border patrol to keep people out instead of processing them in, punish employers harshly for hiring illegals, reinstate remain in Mexico . . . " and I could go for several paragraphs.
Last edited: