Exxon accurately predicted GW in the 70s but kept casting doubt for decades

[Toddsterpatriot]

And the wood pellets that are from trees and vegetation that have spent years of recent history converting CO2 to 02…and replaced by vegetation which will continue to do so.

And the same carbon based fuel would be used to send Oil, which we should not spare.

And the oil in use over there emits more pollution then wood Pellets.

Rebewables are inexhaustableb from most forms including managed tree and vegetation

Dufus, it’s global warming not country warming.

And the wood pellets that are from trees and vegetation that have spent years of recent history converting CO2 to 02…and replaced by vegetation which will continue to do so.

Yup. So now you've burned the fuel to move the wood. Not carbon neutral.

And the same carbon based fuel would be used to send Oil

Did anybody claim oil was carbon neutral? DURR.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And do you have the post I was responding too ? Guess not.

Low IQ liberal.

 

[Dagosa]

And the wood pellets that are from trees and vegetation that have spent years of recent history converting CO2 to 02…and replaced by vegetation which will continue to do so.

Yup. So now you've burned the fuel to move the wood. Not carbon neutral.

And the same carbon based fuel would be used to send Oil

Did anybody claim oil was carbon neutral? DURR.

Oil isn’t carbon neutral. Neutrality doesn’t exist between millennium.

moving the wood pellets uses the same energy source as moving the oil or coal. Plus, burning the wood pellets is not only neutral with respect to its growth, but pollutes LESS then the coal or oil it replaces.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oil isn’t carbon neutral. Neutrality doesn’t exist between millennium.

moving the wood pellets uses the same energy source as moving the oil or coal. Plus, burning the wood pellets is not only neutral with respect to its growth, but pollutes LESS then the coal or oil it replaces.

Oil isn’t carbon neutral.

Neither is shipping wood pellets across the Atlantic.

 

[Dagosa]

View attachment 747602

Low IQ liberal.

Low intellect conservative using “IQ” when it went out with whale oil.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oil isn’t carbon neutral. Neutrality doesn’t exist between millennium.

moving the wood pellets uses the same energy source as moving the oil or coal. Plus, burning the wood pellets is not only neutral with respect to its growth, but pollutes LESS then the coal or oil it replaces.

moving the wood pellets uses the same energy source as moving the oil or coal.

Is it the same amount of energy to move it?
Wood pellets are less dense. Most coal has more energy per pound than wood.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Low intellect conservative using “IQ” when it went out with whale oil.

Low IQ liberal still can't do the stoichiometry.

 

[Dagosa]

Oil isn’t carbon neutral.

Neither is shipping wood pellets across the Atlantic.

Dufus comparison. “Shipping” isn’t either. It ultimately pollutes less then shipping oil or coal. If you heat your home with wood pellets vs home heating oil, you still include shipping pollution.
But, you prefer to pollute ? Maybe you don’t think Europe is on the same planet.


You actually want to ship them more of our oil ?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dufus comparison. “Shipping” isn’t either. It ultimately pollutes less then shipping oil or coal. If you heat your home with wood pellets vs home heating oil, you still include shipping pollution.
But, you prefer to pollute ? Maybe you don’t think Europe is on the same planet.


You actually want to ship them more of our oil ?

It ultimately pollutes less then shipping oil or coal.

Prove it. Show how much pollution from shipping wood versus shipping coal.

If you heat your home with wood pellets vs home heating oil

Who heats their home with wood pellets?

Maybe you don’t think Europe is on the same planet.

Same planet, still burns fuel to ship wood pellets.

You actually want to ship them more of our oil ?

They aren't burning oil to generate electricity.

 

[Dagosa]

Prove it. Show how much pollution from shipping wood versus shipping coal.

You miss read it…..”ultimately” means including the actual use of oil and coal as well as the shipping. ULTIMATELY, you neglect and use your own bogus statement.

Who heats their home with wood pellets?

We do. As do many people in our area. Its much cheaper then oil as are heat pumps. It’s a total no brainer.
In addition, nearly 1/3 of our electricity is bio mass with hydro being 1/3 and the rest a mix including wind and solar. Our entire state is a huge bio mass user

 

[Dagosa]

They aren't burning oil to generate electricity.

Oil is still used for heating heating with nat gas. Try to stay current.

 

[Dagosa]

It ultimately pollutes less then shipping oil or coal.

Prove it. Show how much pollution from shipping wood versus shipping coal.

If you heat your home with wood pellets vs home heating oil

Who heats their home with wood pellets?

Maybe you don’t think Europe is on the same planet.

Same planet, still burns fuel to ship wood pellets.

You actually want to ship them more of our oil ?

They aren't burning oil to generate electricity.

What’s your point ? We aren't moving away from fossil fuels other then nat gas. We are all going toward renewables which are much cheaper. You think you have the answer and we should be burning oil at $5.00 a gallon. Wtf is your point ?

 

[Dagosa]

Most coal has more energy per pound than wood.

Gotta luv the black lung and soot. You‘re a soot man right ?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You miss read it…..”ultimately” means including the actual use of oil and coal as well as the shipping. ULTIMATELY, you neglect and use your own bogus statement.

We do. As do many people in our area. Its much cheaper then oil as are heat pumps. It’s a total no brainer.
In addition, nearly 1/3 of our electricity is bio mass with hydro being 1/3 and the rest a mix including wind and solar. Our entire state is a huge bio mass user

You won't show how how much pollution from shipping wood versus shipping coal.
Coward.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oil is still used for heating heating with nat gas. Try to stay current.

We're talking about electricity. Stop trying to change your losing subject.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What’s your point ? We aren't moving away from fossil fuels other then nat gas. We are all going toward renewables which are much cheaper. You think you have the answer and we should be burning oil at $5.00 a gallon. Wtf is your point ?

What’s your point ?

You keep posting errors (lies?).

We aren't moving away from fossil fuels other then nat gas.

We're moving away from natural gas?

We are all going toward renewables which are much cheaper.

But they aren't cheaper. Remember nameplate versus actual output?

You think you have the answer

The answer isn't shipping wood pellets thousands of miles.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Gotta luv the black lung and soot. You‘re a soot man right ?

You know we have masks and scrubbers now, don't you?

 

[Crick]

Evening Todd. Seems a little quieter lately, doesn't it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Evening Todd. Seems a little quieter lately, doesn't it.

I think Dagosa's brain activity dropped below that needed for life.

 

[Dagosa]

You know we have masks and scrubbers now, don't you?

Wow, masks and scrubbers. You’re hilarious. Next you’ll tell us coal is clean. Geesus, you’ve never worked with coal have you ?