iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,921
- 1,600
i just want the truth. did they work against the system against the rules/laws in place?Explosive Lisa Page Testimony: Dossier Timeline Contradictions And DOJ Interference
Explosive Lisa Page Testimony: Dossier Timeline Contradictions And DOJ Interference - Sara A. Carter
Testimony provided to Congress from former FBI lawyer Lisa Page reveals contradictions as to when she learned about former British spy Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump dossier, sheds light on the “insurance policy” and exposes the Obama Justice Department’s decision not to charge Hillary Clinton with allegedly violating the Espionage Act.
Page’s testimony, which was delivered behind closed doors last July before a joint task force of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, reveals the internal machinations between senior bureau leadership and the DOJ. Basically, her testimony adds more depth to what happened during the critical months during the FBI’s investigation into President Trump’s election campaign and the bureau’s “Midyear Exam” investigation into Clinton.... As for the Clinton investigation, Page said the bureau “did not blow over gross negligence.” She told Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, there were ongoing discussions with former FBI Director James Comey and other senior officials about the issue. She said “on its face, it did seem like, well, maybe there’s a potential here for this to be the charge.... Page’s testimony does coincide with what former FBI General Counsel James Baker’s told the committee on “gross negligence.” In testimony he stated that he originally believed Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of highly classified information was “alarming” and “appalling,” as first reported at SaraACarter.com. He also believed her use of a private server to send the classified emails was sufficient enough to secure an indictment to possibly charge her for violations under the Espionage Act, for mishandling sensitive government documents.
~~~~~~
The repercussions of these crimes are still happening with the Mueller investigation! Typical Progressive Marxist Socialist Democrats want to ignore the crimes committed by their own party, but wants to persecute any republican like Tucker Carlson for things that were said 10 years ago, or an appointed Justice to the Supreme Court that allegedly did something 30 years ago.
This is the real collusion between the FBI Cabal of Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Loretta Lynch DOJ for an insurance policy against Trump who they thought would never win.
From Lisa Paige's testimony, "Ratcliffe asked if the decision not to charge Clinton with gross negligence was a direct order from the DOJ. When you say advice you got from the Department, you're making it sound like it was the Department that told you? You're not going to charge gross negligence because we're the prosecutors and we're telling you we're not going to, he said. Page responded: That's correct!!" WOW!
So now Progressive Marist Socialist Dems are abandoning their "Russian Collusion" conspiracy theories. What now? College admission bribery? Hoaxed racist attacks? Meanwhile in the real world, Trump is well on his way to his 2020 re-election.
I have to give Lisa a lot of credit. She has come clean with all this since it was revealed and cooperated fully with any questioning.
i don't give a shit about emotional political twists of why it's ok for one and not the other. that's the shit that dug this fucking hole and when i see people rush to condem the other side for shit they do all the time, i get "they are the fucking problem" rushing through my head.
i wish these people would attack issues with the same passion as they attack people.