Brennan, Strzok, Page subpoenaed

[otto105]

Former CIA Director John Brennan, ex-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were among more than two dozen people subpoenaed Friday as part of a Justice Department investigation into the 2016 Trump-Russia collusion probe.

A total of 30 federal grand jury subpoenas were issued related to the investigation into the Obama-era “Russigate” probe, a source told The Post.

30 subpoenas? Don't know about the others, but the lies coming from Brennan, Strzok and Page should be quite interesting.

Ex-CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI officials Strzok, Page subpoenaed as part of Russiagate probe: sources

Hilarious

 

[scruffy]

But Dotard and hacks like Eileen have been controlling it.

That should teach you a lesson.

But it probably won't

 

[berg80]

John Brennan voted for the Communist Party in 1976. He never should have gotten close to sniffing the CIA job and should be in prison.
He's scared right now.
I'm glad he's scared.
I like him scared.

It frequently makes me wonder why you folks choose to live in a haze of disingenuous right wing media bull pucky, cluttered with half truths, when the whole truth takes so little effort to find.

Then it comes to me. Your entire belief system is built on a foundation of horseshit. Once you start removing some of the pillars the entire thing collapses under its own weight.

AI Overview

Yes, former CIA Director John Brennan did vote for the Communist Party candidate in 1976 as a protest vote against the two-party system, a fact he publicly acknowledged, but it was a singular protest vote early in his life, not indicative of ongoing support for communism, and he explained it to the CIA during his application process, according to his memoir.

 

[berg80]

Nothing has ever happened to any of them but for Nixon got targeted and removed. The Trump was targeted, charged, harassed, shot at twice etc. Kennedy? What happened there?

Underlings frequently take the fall. There were 31 criminal convictions among members of his admin while Ron was screwing up the country.

 

[berg80]

He never admitted to that. He did admit showgirls are easy lays and this has been well known since the early 1940s. Trump has no crimes to be jailed for.

The so-called rape inside the store was never agreed to as rape by the jury. She won money thanks to her being defamed was her claim.

Did you know besides E. Jean Carroll his ex-wife Ivana accused him of rape. But she was bought off.

 

[Crepitus]

TDS, you got it bad.

Nope, you do.

 

[Concerned American]

But Dotard and hacks like Eileen have been controlling it.

Post in thread 'This is what lawfare looks like.'

Dec 19, 2025

berg has 3 more years to waste his time typing.
View attachment 1193584

Why did you bother to comment?

asking for nobody in particular

• Dante

• 

Projecting again. Aren't you tired of carrying water for a bunch of anti-American, globalist pos's that will put you at the bottom rung of the communist hierarchy that they are planning? SMH

 

[Robert W]

Did you know besides E. Jean Carroll his ex-wife Ivana accused him of rape. But she was bought off.

E. Jean Carroll never proved this. I don't know if Trumps ex wife accused him. I know that Bill Clinton was accused of raping a few women. Did you know that?

 

[berg80]

Subpoenas were issued in probe of Russia ‘conspiracy,’ then DOJ clawed them back, sources say​

The Justice Department on Monday night began withdrawing several subpoenas that had been issued just days prior in a criminal probe of former CIA Director John Brennan and a purported conspiracy by the Obama administration to embarrass President Donald Trump, according to three people familiar with the matter.

The dramatic shift in plans revealed some confusion and disorder in the controversial Justice Department investigation, which career prosecutors have privately criticized as lacking evidence and being politically motivated to please Trump.

The subpoenas, which were delivered over the weekend, had sought the scheduled testimony of witnesses with knowledge of the Obama administration’s decision to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. The subpoenas were touted by Trump administration allies as a sign of progress the Justice Department was making in a top political priority for the president: to go after the architects of the Russia probe that eventually became special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Trump’s campaign and Trump himself.

Subpoenas were issued in probe of Russia ‘conspiracy,’ then DOJ clawed them back, sources say

The Justice Department sent subpoenas to witnesses, and then withdrew them, in its investigation of former CIA Director John Brennan for his role in the Russia investigation.

www.ms.now

Getting ahead of another failed prosecution of a trump enemy?

 

[Meathead]

Subpoenas were issued in probe of Russia ‘conspiracy,’ then DOJ clawed them back, sources say​

The Justice Department on Monday night began withdrawing several subpoenas that had been issued just days prior in a criminal probe of former CIA Director John Brennan and a purported conspiracy by the Obama administration to embarrass President Donald Trump, according to three people familiar with the matter.

The dramatic shift in plans revealed some confusion and disorder in the controversial Justice Department investigation, which career prosecutors have privately criticized as lacking evidence and being politically motivated to please Trump.

The subpoenas, which were delivered over the weekend, had sought the scheduled testimony of witnesses with knowledge of the Obama administration’s decision to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. The subpoenas were touted by Trump administration allies as a sign of progress the Justice Department was making in a top political priority for the president: to go after the architects of the Russia probe that eventually became special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Trump’s campaign and Trump himself.

Subpoenas were issued in probe of Russia ‘conspiracy,’ then DOJ clawed them back, sources say

The Justice Department sent subpoenas to witnesses, and then withdrew them, in its investigation of former CIA Director John Brennan for his role in the Russia investigation.

www.ms.now

Getting ahead of another failed prosecution of a trump enemy?

MSNOW?! FFS!

 

[berg80]

The predicate for withdrawing the subpoenas was.........

DOJ removes top prosecutor who questioned case against former CIA Director John Brennan​

The Justice Department has removed the lead prosecutor overseeing an investigation involving former CIA Director John Brennan, a longtime critic of President Donald Trump, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Maria Medetis Long, a veteran prosecutor for the U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of Florida, told colleagues in her office that she had recently told her superiors that there was not ample justification to bring criminal charges against Brennan, according to one person briefed on her discussions who asked to speak anonymously due to the sensitivity of internal deliberations. She also told colleagues she expected to withdraw from the case.

Medetis Long sent an email Thursday to attorneys representing clients drawn into the case saying she would no longer be working on the investigation, according to a person with knowledge of her notification.

DOJ removes top prosecutor who questioned case against former CIA Director John Brennan

Maria Medetis Long told her superiors there was not sufficient basis to charge Brennan, who played a key role in the finding that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win.

www.ms.now

Trump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins​

Trump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins

The DOJ reportedly taps former Trump attorney Joe diGenova to oversee a probe into ex-CIA Director John Brennan and Trump-Russia investigation origins.

www.foxnews.com

As you may or may not recall, diGenova is a nutbag of the first order.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Again, I guess the Statute of Limitations means nothing in the 21st Century DOJ.

 

[berg80]

Again, I guess the Statute of Limitations means nothing in the 21st Century DOJ.

trump wants revenge for the humiliation of having it proved Putin helped him get elected. So, despite people like Rubio..........as the chairman of the SIC............and John Durham.............a R who investigated for 4 years.............coming up empty for any wrongdoing on the part of the Obama admin, Don won't stop trying.