LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,224
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #621
yep i have seen it before,nothing new.Like I just got done saying,dont believe everything you hear.from here on out up till february 15th you will see all kinds of disinformation articles appearing on the net. thats dated from yesterday but they are posing nothing new that they havent already talked about from months back though except for a couple things.I know you probably have already read this article:
NFL Los Angeles Team In 2015 Stadium Deal Team Owners Are Relocation Hurdles
but they're still talking about it. Some SoCal professor thinks time is running out for next season but we'll see.
[
For instance,thats a lie what they said there about there being no clear path for a new stadium.the city of LA has been working on this for the last 5 years or so to make sure they get an NFL team.they already have a stadium plan ready to go and ready to start construction on it but they cant start construction on it until there is a team that announces their intent to move to LA.its the rules.till a team announces their intent to move to LA,they cant start building it.makes sense.
cant believe what some professor says either.does that professor of that college serve on the city council of LA? does he owrk in the rams organization? does he work for the NFL? didnt think so.

thats comedy gold that they use old leverage thing again.saying that if a team moves to LA,nfl owners wont be able to use the city of LA as a leverage barganing chip anymore?
I've shot that argument down many times before when they brought that up in the fact that the rams coming to LA doesnt affect teams still being able to use LA as leverage to get new stadium deals in the least.
The NFL will keep saying they want to have a second team in LA as well so LA wil STILL be there actually as bargaining chip for them to use for a new stadium so thats not true at all.
they are using that comment about how the rams are still taking requests for season ticket orders next year and thats because they are trying to keep a lid on it that its a done deal they are moving.they forget to mention the fact that you can easily get a refund on on season tickets.

Oh and goddel has been in on this coverup from day one when kroneke made the purchase of the land,he spread one lie after another.
He first told the media that kronke was just making the purchase of land as a business venture saying that 60 acres was not enough land for a stadium.that lie was quickly shot down when it was revealed that the 49ers new stadium, levi stadium only sits on 22 acres of land and that the largest land used for an NFL stadium,the dallas cowboys,sits on just 44 acres.

He then said that kroneke was going to use it to build a soccer team in LA. That was then laughed about around the country when it was revealed that LA already has TWO soccer teams.like LA is realy going to bring in a THIRD soccer team? yeah right.an Im the king of england.

THEN when everybody found out that one was an outright lie by goddell as well he then said the land was being purchased by him to build a walmart store there.that lie fell apart as well when it was pointed out the city of LA rejected that site just a couple months ago when a big investor said they wanted to build a walmart store there,they rejected it saying that site is going to be used for something else and wont be available for anybody to use to build anything there.

it was one coverup and one lie after another by goddell.

oh and proof that that article is full of disinformation is the fact that they say LA has two major league baseball teams claiming the angles play in LA.Thats a lie as well.LA has only one baseball team.the dodgers.the angels are los angeles in name only.they play in anahiem,a different city.so LA does not have two major league baseball teams.
so dont believe everything you hear.
i see they at least covered something that all these blowhards sportwriters never do about the raiders when mentioning them possibly coming back.I give them credit for at least making it clear that the raiders wont be back mentioning the fact that they would have a hard sell getting the owners to approve the move.the NFL has said it has to be the right team and the right fit.the raiders are for sure neither.

they also mentioned as well the fact that i covered earlier in a previous article that it has to be an owner with deep pockets.that is what kroneke IS and davis is not.Davis has very small pockets.he is very poor in fact when you compare him to the rich owners like jerry jones and kroneke of course.

Last edited: