Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About The 911 Conspiracy Theory In Under 5 Minutes

More proof that Dawgshit can not, will not rebuttal any scientific FACTS that are counter to the OCT fantasy. Saying that someone has a tenuous grip on reality for believing and subscribing to acknowledged, bonafide, documented, proven scientific FACTS such as the melting point of steel, or the laws of physics, that academics will agree with, goes to show you really has the tenuous grip on reality. In fact YOU are the one who lives in the twilight zone of severe denial, and total disregard of the mentioned scientific FACTS, and who displays a laughingly pathetic cowardliness to engage in any meaningful discussion about it.
Instead you just do what you always do, and what you were sent here to do, mainly to redirect serious discussion with bullshit tactics or statements that have absolutely NO substance based on reality.

The 9-11 attacks on our nation and the subsequent "explanations" of it as told by your government have been shown to be false on many aspects, and therefore unprovable, to all but a few morons like you who don't even agree that "jet fuel" does NOT burn hot enough to melt massive steel structures. You're a fucking clown.
when you're done masturbating ....

How about you just explain how the WTC steel melted with jet fuel instead of fantasizing about me sexually you fucking faggot.
two more things sister jones jones fails to comprehend...1. no steel melted at any of the wtc sites.
2. calling your post masturbation is not a sexual fantasy, it is however a spot on description of the nonfactual and non provable nature of your claims.
 
when you're done masturbating ....

How about you just explain how the WTC steel melted with jet fuel instead of fantasizing about me sexually you fucking faggot.
two more things sister jones jones fails to comprehend...1. no steel melted at any of the wtc sites.
2. calling your post masturbation is not a sexual fantasy, it is however a spot on description of the nonfactual and non provable nature of your claims.

Daws get a life and a real job you parasite

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v36bkCB8sTY]9/11 Truth: NIST engineer denies molten steel at Ground Zero - YouTube[/ame]
 
How about you just explain how the WTC steel melted with jet fuel instead of fantasizing about me sexually you fucking faggot.
two more things sister jones jones fails to comprehend...1. no steel melted at any of the wtc sites.
2. calling your post masturbation is not a sexual fantasy, it is however a spot on description of the nonfactual and non provable nature of your claims.

Daws get a life and a real job you parasite

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v36bkCB8sTY]9/11 Truth: NIST engineer denies molten steel at Ground Zero - YouTube[/ame]
a 911 toof clip is not evidence of melted steel....

Daws get a life and a real job you parasite.... eots

eot's jealousy rears it's misshapen head..:eusa_boohoo:
 
when you're done masturbating ....

How about you just explain how the WTC steel melted with jet fuel instead of fantasizing about me sexually you fucking faggot.
two more things sister jones jones fails to comprehend...1. no steel melted at any of the wtc sites.
2. calling your post masturbation is not a sexual fantasy, it is however a spot on description of the nonfactual and non provable nature of your claims.

You would think that after 11 years, one of the twoofers would have a picture of the "rivers" of molten steel in either molten or cooled form. But maybe they're keeping it in a safe place until the new investigation.

But you watch. One of our illustrious last 4 twoofers here will post a picture or YouTubey of the "meteorite". But they will conveniently ignore the bits of paper and softer metals sticking out of it.
 
so all these first responders are..twoofers ??...thats your argument...lol...what a loser

Which first responder has proof of "rivers" of molten STEEL? Not molten metals like lead, aluminum, copper or brass, but specifically STEEL?
 
How about you just explain how the WTC steel melted with jet fuel instead of fantasizing about me sexually you fucking faggot.
two more things sister jones jones fails to comprehend...1. no steel melted at any of the wtc sites.
2. calling your post masturbation is not a sexual fantasy, it is however a spot on description of the nonfactual and non provable nature of your claims.

You would think that after 11 years, one of the twoofers would have a picture of the "rivers" of molten steel in either molten or cooled form. But maybe they're keeping it in a safe place until the new investigation.

But you watch. One of our illustrious last 4 twoofers here will post a picture or YouTubey of the "meteorite". But they will conveniently ignore the bits of paper and softer metals sticking out of it.

as a welder I have seen that very thing.it sticks to the surface as it cools
it would be very simple to determine if the bulk of this object was in fact steel or not...no ?
 
so all these first responders are..twoofers ??...thats your argument...lol...what a loser

Which first responder has proof of "rivers" of molten STEEL? Not molten metals like lead, aluminum, copper or brass, but specifically STEEL?

he specifically says molten steel running down the channel rails ..they talk of steel columns melted
 
two more things sister jones jones fails to comprehend...1. no steel melted at any of the wtc sites.
2. calling your post masturbation is not a sexual fantasy, it is however a spot on description of the nonfactual and non provable nature of your claims.

You would think that after 11 years, one of the twoofers would have a picture of the "rivers" of molten steel in either molten or cooled form. But maybe they're keeping it in a safe place until the new investigation.

But you watch. One of our illustrious last 4 twoofers here will post a picture or YouTubey of the "meteorite". But they will conveniently ignore the bits of paper and softer metals sticking out of it.

as a welder I have seen that very thing.it sticks to the surface as it cools
it would be very simple to determine if the bulk of this object was in fact steel or not...no ?

You've seen paper stick to hot metal without scorching?

tumblr_m2e538usJw1r4gei2o6_250.gif
 
these people are in fact experts....

its orange... it clearly contains iron...why would NIST not simple test the object ??

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbMu2w7fSG8&feature=related]Molten WTC rock - YouTube[/ame]
 
these people are in fact experts....

its orange... it clearly contains iron...why would NIST not simple test the object ??

Molten WTC rock - YouTube

The concrete does not have point melting. When the temperature is high (more than 1000°C) the concrete one crumbles like the sugar. Their components have different behavior. Stone and sand melts to 2600°C, the steel melt to 2500°. The same happens to the components of the cement.
What is the melting point of concrete and or cement? - Yahoo! Answers

The steel could not have been melted, or the concrete would have crumbled.
 
these people are in fact experts....

its orange... it clearly contains iron...why would NIST not simple test the object ??

Molten WTC rock - YouTube

The concrete does not have point melting. When the temperature is high (more than 1000°C) the concrete one crumbles like the sugar. Their components have different behavior. Stone and sand melts to 2600°C, the steel melt to 2500°. The same happens to the components of the cement.
What is the melting point of concrete and or cement? - Yahoo! Answers

The steel could not have been melted, or the concrete would have crumbled.

OMG whatever are you babbling about...and regardless of what retarded point you are trying to make the fact remains it would take only a few minutes to scientifically determine if the object contained steel...why would they not do this ???
 
these people are in fact experts....

its orange... it clearly contains iron...why would NIST not simple test the object ??

Molten WTC rock - YouTube

The concrete does not have point melting. When the temperature is high (more than 1000°C) the concrete one crumbles like the sugar. Their components have different behavior. Stone and sand melts to 2600°C, the steel melt to 2500°. The same happens to the components of the cement.
What is the melting point of concrete and or cement? - Yahoo! Answers

The steel could not have been melted, or the concrete would have crumbled.

OMG whatever are you babbling about...and regardless of what retarded point you are trying to make the fact remains it would take only a few minutes to scientifically determine if the object contained steel...why would they not do this ???

Of course it contains steel. The floor pans, trusses and re-bar were all made of steel.

The point is it couldn't be molten steel, because the heat from that would have disintegrated the concrete that still remains in the "meteorite".

And the heat of the molten steel also would have burned the bits of paper, too.
 
What is the melting point of concrete and or cement? - Yahoo! Answers

The steel could not have been melted, or the concrete would have crumbled.

OMG whatever are you babbling about...and regardless of what retarded point you are trying to make the fact remains it would take only a few minutes to scientifically determine if the object contained steel...why would they not do this ???

Of course it contains steel. The floor pans, trusses and re-bar were all made of steel.

The point is it couldn't be molten steel, because the heat from that would have disintegrated the concrete that still remains in the "meteorite".

And the heat of the molten steel also would have burned the bits of paper, too.

you do not really believe your own bull do you ? the object is clearly been melted it does not have chunks of steel sticking out of it..the temperatures it was subjected to can be tested..its composition can be scientifically determined..the concrete would not of disintegrated it would crumble ,big difference..and you have not given any explanation as to why simple test would not be done on this object,,any clear thinking, rational person would understand it could be of great forensic value in determining to the conditions and cause of the collapse
 
Last edited:
OMG whatever are you babbling about...and regardless of what retarded point you are trying to make the fact remains it would take only a few minutes to scientifically determine if the object contained steel...why would they not do this ???

Of course it contains steel. The floor pans, trusses and re-bar were all made of steel.

The point is it couldn't be molten steel, because the heat from that would have disintegrated the concrete that still remains in the "meteorite".

And the heat of the molten steel also would have burned the bits of paper, too.

you do not really believe your own bull do you ? the object is clearly been melted it does not have chunks of steel sticking out of it..the temperatures it was subjected to can be tested..its composition can be scientifically determined..the concrete would not of disintegrated it would crumble ,big difference..and you have not given any explanation as to why simple test would not be done on this object,,any clear thinking, rational person would understand it could be of great forensic value in determining to the conditions and cause of the collapse

Would you like to rephrase that??

361677c8a82a90fd700aa768885e7a08.jpg
 
During this brief interlude, I would like to point out that Rimjob will be along soon to say I got my ass handed to me, and also that daws & I farted in here.

We now return you to the regular discussion already in progress.
 

Forum List

Back
Top