yes you are hilarious...and all the dodging in the world will not make you right.
to have any validity as evidence for something other than fire you'd have to prove that the planes or debris had nothing to do with the fires.
your other so called called evidence of other infernos is not relevant
as there was no other contributing factors other then fire.
NIST said the main cause was fire at WTC 7. Read the report. The WTC 7 came down with many aspects of a CD. NIST was charged with proving this fire only scenario and they failed miserably. You believe NIST, and apparently sometimes don't as you go against what NIST said was the primary cause of WTC 7 demise.
You sound like a confused idiot, especially when posted pictures of other blazing infernos used to show you and others as proof that steel framed hirise buildings have, and can indeed withstand more severe fires and DO NOT COLLAPSE with any attributes of a CD.
It does not matter what starts the fire, the end results are the same... buildings on fire so much so that it became an inferno, and yet they didn't collapse. No one can be as stupid as you are displaying, you are simply being a shill and an internet message board treasonous troll, and not a very good one at that. It is you who are purposefully dodging any serious debate, while playing the role of stupid.
btw shit for brains nist factored in the damage from wtc 1 as starting the fires :What caused the fires in WTC 7?
Again the end result was sporadic fires that NIST admitted moved around the building. They did not say that the WTC 7 sustained significant enough damage from the tower to cause the collapse, it was blamed on the fire that they GUESS was started by falling debris, but it's only a guess like the rest of their fable.
Debris from the collapse of WTC 1, which was 370 feet to the south, ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces. However, only the fires on some of the lower floors-7 through 9 and 11 through 13-burned out of control. These lower-floor fires-which spread and grew because the water supply to the automatic sprinkler system for these floors had failed-were similar to building fires experienced in other tall buildings. The primary and backup water supply to the sprinkler systems for the lower floors relied on the city's water supply, whose lines were damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2. These uncontrolled lower-floor fires eventually spread to the northeast part of WTC 7, where the building's collapse began."
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
They have not to this day proven that in all likely hood this was true. They had to change their fuel loads and change the name of occupants to fit their preconceived outcome accordingly.
How much did the sprinkler system in the other hirise fires that were posted help those structures dumbass? They sustained more severe damage, from the fires and burned for many more hours without any assistance from sprinklers. You are a massive fail and don't help in any way to legitimize the NIST fire only hypothesis. Actually proof of NIST deceitful tactics also lay in the fact they wont release their computer simulation data for replication. Fires alone can not cause the total global collapse of a reinforced fireproof,
fortified hirise like the WTC 7. And could not have caused the total exploding collapse of the towers. They were 1/4 mile in height, tapered in steel thickness the lower they went.
You are a fool for not even questioning something so obviously peculiar, then staunchly defending a report that given the circumstance, you go against! Not to mention the laws of physics!
so your bullshit about fire only is just that bullshit..
you might actually learn something if you read the nist report ,not just twoofer propaganda.
So your bullshit about fire only, is just that, bullshit..
you might actually learn something if you read the NIST report ,not just LIES and propaganda.
By all means do reply this is too funny, as you are a great source of comic supply especially the way you try to turn and twist your reply's around like a lying 2 year old.
The NIST report is BS, they were caught in many instances lying and using deceitful scientific tactics, their testing didn't even back them up, so they had to come up with a BS computer simulation that does not match the viewed results, AND to top it all off
they refuse to let others in the scientific community try to replicate their results, despite this being a government entity that is funded with tax payer money, and you have the audacity and ignorance to come on a public forum and display such nonsensical ignorance.
It's too much fun.
and like clockwork,as always,when challenged to address the inconsistencys in this five minute video,him and moron in the hat wont do it.
